|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
74 registered members (jmj120, johnv, turfarmer, CarbonClimber1, WhoMe, imadeerhntr, JohnG, UA Hunter, woodduck, jprice, AU338MAG, BobK, Bigwhitey, BearBranch, Hornhntr, Remington270, rd8549, Chancetribe, Brownitsdown, trlrdrdave, RedneckNinji, Bamajoz, jarcher38, canichols424, Paddlejon, weatherby, bambam32, BrentsFX4, GomerPyle, Ruger7mag, Bronco 74, Overland, Richard Cranium, akbejeepin, THALL, rickyh_2, longshot, bamaeyedoc, skoor, Bowfish, Young20, cchoque93, dustymac, ridgestalker, Bustinbeards, sawdust, coldtrail, Huntn2feed5, Bruno, Shotts2000, CeeHawk37, Darrylcom, janiemae, Irishguy, Jdkprp70, Squeaky, billrv, Tall Dog, laylandad, MikeP, Marengo hunter, Maggie123, Joe4majors, lckrn, 3Gs, Ten37, 8 invisible),
647
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Oklahoma
#3433372
06/29/21 05:41 PM
06/29/21 05:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,460 IN
ParrotHead89
OP
10 point
|
OP
10 point
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,460
IN
|
|
|
|
Re: Oklahoma
[Re: ParrotHead89]
#3433624
06/30/21 06:03 AM
06/30/21 06:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 372 NE Mississippi
deerhunt1988
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 372
NE Mississippi
|
Traveling hunters' options just shrank again. Looks like KS and NE will be getting even more pressure, and possibly southeast states too. Which in turn could result in more reduction of public land opportunities to combat the crowds. Just a chain reaction.
Last edited by deerhunt1988; 06/30/21 06:05 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Oklahoma
[Re: ParrotHead89]
#3433812
06/30/21 11:58 AM
06/30/21 11:58 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 52,130 Round ‘bout there
Clem
Mildly Quirky
|
Mildly Quirky
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 52,130
Round ‘bout there
|
I wonder if the 1-bird limit is a salve of sorts to keep from hearing the outcry if they shut it down.
Complete shutdown -- massive revolt, contacting of legislators, online yelling and petitions and such
1-bird limit, other restrictions -- some hunters still will bitch but go hunting and a lot of them will say "Phuck that, it's not worth the effort or cost" and not hunt
The second provides the opportunity but if enough throw up their hands -- like many duck hunters did with the 1-bird limit back in the day - the DNR achieves their goal of reducing hunters and pressure without using the shutdown.
Sort of a reverse psychology deal.
The problem or issue, though, is how many turkey hunters -- let's say, 35 years old or older and have grown up with 4- and 5-bird limits (or 3, in some states) and long seasons -- will continue to hunt if there is a 1-bird limit and other restrictions for several years? Or will they stop hunting?
You maybe can't keep the high limits and seasons. But if you lower it too much and put on the restrictions, will they quit completely? If so, will they return? That's quite a balancing act.
However, in the end, the benefit of the resource is supposed to outweigh the wants of the people. That's a perfect world: first, help the resource and don't be greedy bastards just taking and not conserving.
But after seeing other decisions made based solely on money -- turkey decoys, special hunts with insane application fees, the baiting license -- it's hard to get on board the "Let's all be good little biological helpers!" train.
"Hunting Politics are stupid!" - Farm Hunter
"Bible says you shouldn't put sugar in your cornbread." Dustin, 2013
"Best I can figure 97.365% of the general public is a paint chip eating, mouth breathing, certified dumbass." BCLC, 2020
|
|
|
|