Aren't some if not most of the WMAs still privately held land that is leased to the state? It would be a shame if some of these leases aren't renewed due to destruction of property. I'd vote yes.
Why do you need a fee to prevent destruction? Just close it to rec vehicles.
It doesn't need to be closed to rec vehicles. I enjoy riding and camping on the WMA. It's public land. It should be open to legal outdoor activities. Whoever, if someone is going to use it, purchase a permit like everyone else.
It's not a TAX! It's a permit to use the land.
