I would too. I am just saying that they can write tickets for too many grey areas.
In a earlier post. Troy said that he caught one of the biggest poachers in Tuscaloosa sitting in a shooting house the day after deer season was over. He said he approached him and the guy said he was coyote hunting. Troy said have a nice day.
So I guess what I am saying is, Troy used some judgement in that situation. But looking at what other GW's have done lately, He could have written him up for deer hunting. It remains to be seen if it would have held up in court.
Look I have no problem if I get a ticket I deserve. I paid a speeding ticket last fall. I will be glad to pay more if I get caught speeding.
But I don't think that LEO should have the ability to cite you for something that they think you are doing. Just because they think you are doing something does not mean that you are doing it.
My example above. If I see a deer on the side of the road, I usually slow down and look. Sometimes I stop. Sometimes I don't. I saw a really big buck lask week on the side of the interstate north of Huntsville. I turned around at the next exit and went back. Got my field glasses and looked him over real good. I had a loaded gun in my truck. But I was not hunting from the road.
My opinion of this case is. Bucky fights this in front of jury then how can you determine beyond doubt that he was hunting.
However it will still cost him even if he gets found not guilty, and I think that the LEO should have to pay for his cost.
