One of the more controversial provisions of the Patriot Act was to broaden the “sneak-and-peek” power for federal law enforcement officials. The provision allows investigators to conduct searches without informing the target of the search. We were assured at the time that this was an essential law enforcement tool that would be used only to protect the country from terrorism. Supporters argued that it was critical that investigators be allowed to look into the lives and finances of suspected terrorists without tipping off those terrorists to the fact that they were under investigation.
Civil libertarian critics warned that the federal government already had this power for national security investigations. The Patriot Act provision was far too broad and would almost certainly become a common tactic in cases that have nothing to do with national security.
Most of these things are done under the guise of good intentions. Those that are ultra sympathetic to law enforcement or fearful that nothing but law enforcement can protect them are perfectly willing to give up a little unconstitutional intrusion if they perceive it makes society safer. Law enforcement doesn't see anything wrong with it because they are good guys and they only want to get the bad guys. This has all happened before but many people dismiss history because we are like the frog in boiling pot.
"Political debate: when charlatans come together to discuss their principles" - Bauvard
