I agree with most of what's been said.

Obviously most of us aren't going to spring the $$$ for a Reconex ... But ... is there anyone out there who's bought one or more who feels they can almost make an economic case for it? In other words it cost approx 3x-4x the price of conventional, but perhaps it lasts that multiple longer (?). Or the savings in gas money going to check a dead camera are avoided.

Of course the flip side is covering more lease area with the same money spent on a conventional camera. Just wondering what actual user perception is from "normal" hunters and not those buying cameras as luxury items .