|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
23 registered members (Auburn_03, limabean, Pwyse, Ron A., Bushmaster, Tree Dweller, Johnal3, sj22, lckrn, knock him down, dustymac, BamaGuitarDude, mopar, Geeb, buzzard, Ray_Coon, lthrstkg1, Gary Harris, Ben2, russellb, Jotjackson, Jweeks, 1 invisible),
359
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: riflenut]
#1538131
11/27/15 04:44 AM
11/27/15 04:44 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100 USA
Remington270
OP
Freak of Nature
|
OP
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100
USA
|
Call it what you want. Evolutionists would say the gazelle got so fast because of the cheetah, right? Well what happened to those slow gazelles? They got eaten! The slow genes didn't get carried on. Well with the cull buck theory, where do all the small antler genes go? They die off at the end of a gun, no different than a cheetah, in the end. Dead is dead. Please tell me if you think I'm wrong, and how. I think it is very interesting (regardless of whether I actually believe it)
Through natural selection, the strong, fast, smart naturally dominate a particular species. The weak, slow, dumb die sooner thus don't live as long to pass on the genes. Relating of cull bucks to evolution doesn't apply. Evolution means the animals are naturally evolving to it's environment. When we select a "cull" deer, that in no way promotes the species to evolve. Again, taking a cull deer is artificial selection or selective breeding which does not lead to an evolution of the species. Yes, but the reason actually shoot a buck with ugly antlers, is just that (regardless of whether it's actually true, this is why they do it)
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: BhamFred]
#1538140
11/27/15 04:49 AM
11/27/15 04:49 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100 USA
Remington270
OP
Freak of Nature
|
OP
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100
USA
|
natural selection selects for traits that improve an animals ability to survive. Has nothing to do with man shooting bucks that don't meet some artificial criteria that has nothing to do with survival.
you cannot change the genetic makeup of a HERD by culling antler traits you don't like, those traits are already spread throughout the herd. You can kill ALL the three year old eights, leaving tens to breed and twenty years down the road you will still be shooting those pesky eights.
artificial culling and evolution have nothing to do with each other.... You're disputing the very idea of changing the herd, so my original post doesn't really apply to you, only people who reject evolution, but shoot culls to "clean up the herd", And the idea that all evolutionary traits improve survival is also incorrect (in some cases), and the traits can be just as arbitrary. The fact that turkeys have evolved to strut and have big fanned tails never really helped their survival, but it was attractive to the hens, and got passed on. A gobbler doesn't need that tail to survive, only to get the right to pass on his genes to a hen that was impressed by that tail. There are many other examples like this (but is getting off into a tangent)
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: Ben2]
#1538149
11/27/15 04:59 AM
11/27/15 04:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,074 Glendale, FL
WhiteCityHunter
6 point
|
6 point
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,074
Glendale, FL
|
My understanding of evolution is an ape becoming a man. Me shooting a 3 point at 5 yrs old won't make another deer become an elk.
Maybe I don't understand the question. Evolution is the process by which organisns change or evolve due to a number of factors, which produces new species. It's not a theory anymore either. It's as true as the sun in the sky and us indisputable unless you purposely ignore the scientific evidence like some do. Evolution occurs in geologic (ten of thousands to millions of years)time, not a couple years. Culling ain't going to 'cause' evolution.
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: WhiteCityHunter]
#1538163
11/27/15 05:13 AM
11/27/15 05:13 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100 USA
Remington270
OP
Freak of Nature
|
OP
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100
USA
|
My understanding of evolution is an ape becoming a man. Me shooting a 3 point at 5 yrs old won't make another deer become an elk.
Maybe I don't understand the question. Evolution is the process by which organisns change or evolve due to a number of factors, which produces new species. It's not a theory anymore either. It's as true as the sun in the sky and us indisputable unless you purposely ignore the scientific evidence like some do. Evolution occurs in geologic (ten of thousands to millions of years)time, not a couple years. Culling ain't going to 'cause' evolution. Well, there's a significant portion of folks on here that disagree with you on both counts. Not me, but many. That's the point of the original post. Many folks reject evolution theory (creationism has to be taught in Alabama by law, I believe) but they practice a cull buck management that confirms what they say they are rejecting. Again, I'm not arguing the merits of either side, I'm just pointing out the inconsistency, nothing more.
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: Remington270]
#1538166
11/27/15 05:16 AM
11/27/15 05:16 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,254 North Jackson
ridgestalker
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,254
North Jackson
|
My question is, how can you reject the theory of evolution, and yet still practice it? Evolution gets something from nothing and to me your theory of comparison makes no sense to me. 
"The Heavens declare the glory of God;and the firmament sheweth his handiwork" Pslam 19:1
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: Remington270]
#1538171
11/27/15 05:22 AM
11/27/15 05:22 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,513 Mississippi
riflenut
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,513
Mississippi
|
Yes, but the reason actually shoot a buck with ugly antlers, is just that (regardless of whether it's actually true, this is why they do it)
Humans have been practicing selective breeding (artificial selection) for centuries. The reason we have cow's that are better for milk and other's that are better for eating is selective breeding. We have tomato plants that produce bigger and juicier tomatoes because of the same. We have dogs that are better at tracking because of guess why? Because generations of them have been bred to produce the desired traits. Throughout history, people have tried to do the same with humans. Slave holders bred their big man and big woman to produce bigger stronger slaves. The Nazis tried to produce a superior race through the extermination of undesirables. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, believed in Eugenics and developed an organization to sterilize and abort undesirables (ever noticed that you don't find Planned Parenthood clinics in well to do neighborhoods) through selective breeding. Selective breeding promotes desirable traits but in no way is related to evolution which is a gradual adaptation of a living organism to it's environment.
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson
"I ask, who are the militia? They consist of now of the whole people, except a few public officers." George Mason
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: lefthorn]
#1538189
11/27/15 05:47 AM
11/27/15 05:47 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100 USA
Remington270
OP
Freak of Nature
|
OP
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100
USA
|
If evolution exists, and man came from monkeys, why do monkeys still exist?
God is the creator. Period Evolutionists would say that it's the same as the reason why Catholics still exist even though we have Protestants now, just a branch off a tree. And yes, God is the creator, period.
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: lefthorn]
#1538205
11/27/15 06:05 AM
11/27/15 06:05 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100 USA
Remington270
OP
Freak of Nature
|
OP
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100
USA
|
So, you believe God is the creator and you believe in evolution? How does this work? Did God not create all things and have Adam name them in Genesis? We have new species now that God didn't create?
Just trying to understand. And as far as what God created in Genesis, I don't know if he created all different types of dogs or just dog and different genes are expressed in different dog breeds.
because we know there were only two people created, and out of those two people came all the different races but they are people I think those are all good questions. I know really good Christians that believe for and against evolution.
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: lefthorn]
#1538206
11/27/15 06:06 AM
11/27/15 06:06 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100 USA
Remington270
OP
Freak of Nature
|
OP
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,100
USA
|
And how did we get so deep in the Serious Deer Hunting forum anyway?? Apparently I got into some good stuff last night  But not really....
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: Remington270]
#1538227
11/27/15 06:35 AM
11/27/15 06:35 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 921 'Possum Trot
59Hunter
6 point
|
6 point
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 921
'Possum Trot
|
I think part of the disagreement is definitional - evolution to me is not a theory of the creation of something new, but selection by elimination.
I think the spectrum of genetic traits have existed since Genesis, but in different environments, within any given species, certain characteristics are more desirable to survival/proliferation. Over long periods of time, the members of the species with those traits survive and breed, increasing the % of the population with those traits (Google Punnett Square). The members of the species with less desirable traits don't survive, and therefore don't breed. As this continues for 1000s of years, the genetic make up of the "herd" shifts to the traits most advantageous to the survival of that species, in that environment, and become dominant.
Deer with larger bodies/ more insulation survived better in Saskatchewan than they did in South Texas, but they are still both deer. I think humans with certain traits likewise evolved differently in different environments. However, in my mind, the evolution of a species does not equate to man coming from apes.
|
|
|
Re: Evolution and the idea of Cull Bucks
[Re: Remington270]
#1538366
11/27/15 09:52 AM
11/27/15 09:52 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,569 Sumter County
sumpter_al
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,569
Sumter County
|
I believe in God. I do not believe we evolved from apes.
However I believe in some evolution as well. It can be seen by looking at what men and women 500 years ago were built like. They were much shorter and smaller. I dont know if evolution can occur in that short period of time. I do not know if that is evolution or if it is the access to better food and medicine...
I shoot "weird" bucks to remove them from the gene pool. It would be like not allowing a person with a known genetic affliction from reproducing.
I also dont shoot does after the rut starts. I dont know if they have been bred yet. I usually can kill the number of does I want before the rut starts so it really isnt an issue for me.
I love my country, but don't trust my government.
|
|
|
|