|
Tags
by Jason Carroll. 01/15/25 02:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
112 registered members (trailertrash, 1hunter, 270wsm, Skillet, PanolaProductions, having fun now, mule34, BamaGuitarDude, Kang, BCLC, BC, centralala, Driveby, fourfive45, WhoMe, bamapanic, cullbuck, Turkey, slim68, longshot, Bamarich2, 7PTSPREAD, Gobble4me757, Claims Rep., jhardy, aucountry, AWT6, slippinlipjr, Pwyse, Brian_C, Bruno, Shaneomac2, BPI, Turkeyneck78, beano1, dwoliver, Ron A., Overland, CCC, clayk, doghouse, roll_tide_hunts, Dixiepatriot, wk2hnt, !shiloh!, Holcomb, gatorbait154, BC_Reb, AUjerbear, Buck2020, gwstang, mccarrc, Chaser357, toothdoc, AU67Skeeter, outdoorguy88, NotsoBright, BCnLA, hawndog, J_Martin, HHSyelper, woodduck, chuck216, Solothurn, RocN151, jchurch, straycat, trlrdrdave, TurkeyJoe, Ar-Humter, square, Luxfisher, cch, AL18, Jason Carroll, Grokamole, mcninja, Bows4evr, 700ltr308, Country, Austin1, Doeslayer44, k bush, HSV. HUNTER, Heath, daylate, canichols424, Daveleeal, geeb1, WPZJR, jwalker77, HOYT 09, BigA47, Beadlescomb, PourIron12, WEMOhunter, JCL, rickyh_2, MarkCollin, Remington270, PaytonWP, Birdman83, JSOG47, 9 invisible),
2,535
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#1621364
01/22/16 04:41 AM
01/22/16 04:41 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,911 huntin the big lease
Turkeymaster
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,911
huntin the big lease
|
All I'm saying is for me to have more than enough turkeys where I hunt, why should I have to suffer because N AL doesn't have a huntable population? Sounds like its more of a problem there, then it is in S AL. 3 turkey breast are not enough and a shorter season is complete BS. I wait all year for this, I carry calls in my pockets so I can practice when I have free time, I even start getting in shape after deer season to prepare for my turkey season. not only will a shorter season take money out of my families pocket, it will take money out of our states pocket and local economies where hunting lodges are. you won't stop people from killing over the limit and you might " save" a few turkeys each season but that's just going to increase the probability of them dying of natural causes. How many of you from N AL that are wanting a change made, manage the predators on your place? have you made any habitat improvements? have you ever seen two gobblers on your place and thought to yourself, I may find a couple of other places to kill a bird or two this year and leave these to breed all season? I'm guessing very little management of the predators and I'm guessing you've never considered leaving birds alone for seed. I for one am always conscious of how many birds I take off of a piece of property and try and divide my limit and everyone else's limits I help with up amongst different counties and properties and I have had nothing but success in practicing this. If the turkey numbers are as bad in N AL as said, then something needs to be done but I disagree with the whole state changing.
"All is fair in love, War and Turkey Hunting"
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: BamaGuitarDude]
#1621403
01/22/16 05:00 AM
01/22/16 05:00 AM
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,678 Alabama
Honolua
I'm Honey Lou Lou and I voted for Obama... Twice!!!
|
I'm Honey Lou Lou and I voted for Obama... Twice!!!
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,678
Alabama
|
From our surveys and WMA harvest data not enough jakes are killed to make a difference. I've personally yet to see a rule or regulation stop a "killer" from killing what they want & the amount of what they want. IMO, there are hunters & killers. Hunters "get" that killing a bunch of jakes is stupid. you never will there was never any law ever written that prevented a poacher from poaching.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: BamaGuitarDude]
#1621410
01/22/16 05:05 AM
01/22/16 05:05 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340 Jackson County
BrentM
Mr. Turkey
|
Mr. Turkey
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340
Jackson County
|
From our surveys and WMA harvest data not enough jakes are killed to make a difference. I've personally yet to see a rule or regulation stop a "killer" from killing what they want & the amount of what they want. IMO, there are hunters & killers. Hunters "get" that killing a bunch of jakes is stupid. I don't think I've ever seen a "killer" that was a jake shooter. I guess maybe there are some folks that greedy but I don't think I've ever known one.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: BrentM]
#1621423
01/22/16 05:11 AM
01/22/16 05:11 AM
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,678 Alabama
Honolua
I'm Honey Lou Lou and I voted for Obama... Twice!!!
|
I'm Honey Lou Lou and I voted for Obama... Twice!!!
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,678
Alabama
|
I think another thing that people aren't factoring in is that the past 3 springs (at least in north Alabama) have been very odd ones. 2013 and 2015 were damp, cool and overcast all the way into May. In 2014 temperatures hit 90 a couple times in March and then mid April it started raining every day. '13 and '15 were both real weird years for gobbling but it wasn't because there weren't plenty of turkeys here. The places I hunt went thru a real bad lull from around 2003-2007 and then the numbers started to rebound. In the 1999-2000 seasons there were mornings where I heard 20+ turkeys gobbling in Jackson county. In 2003-2004 lots of times I didn't hear any. Nobody killed them off they just had bad hatches. They're birds. They are gonna go thru some pretty wild population swings. Only thing we can do as a state to help them is make sure we don't let them die off from some kind of exotic disease, give them some good habitat and keep predators in check. Quiet Turkeys is directly related to predator pressure simple as that. This brings me back to predator control. WAY too much focus on people killing them and no viable predator habitat solutions.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: BrentM]
#1621437
01/22/16 05:21 AM
01/22/16 05:21 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,991 Tuscaloosa Co.
N2TRKYS
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,991
Tuscaloosa Co.
|
I think another thing that people aren't factoring in is that the past 3 springs (at least in north Alabama) have been very odd ones. 2013 and 2015 were damp, cool and overcast all the way into May. In 2014 temperatures hit 90 a couple times in March and then mid April it started raining every day. '13 and '15 were both real weird years for gobbling but it wasn't because there weren't plenty of turkeys here. The places I hunt went thru a real bad lull from around 2003-2007 and then the numbers started to rebound. In the 1999-2000 seasons there were mornings where I heard 20+ turkeys gobbling in Jackson county. In 2003-2004 lots of times I didn't hear any. Nobody killed them off they just had bad hatches. They're birds. They are gonna go thru some pretty wild population swings. Only thing we can do as a state to help them is make sure we don't let them die off from some kind of exotic disease, give them some good habitat and keep predators in check. I haven't forgotten about weather patterns, predation, or habitat. The theory I've had and have seen proven true includes all of those factors.
83% of all statistics are made up.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: Honolua]
#1621444
01/22/16 05:25 AM
01/22/16 05:25 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340 Jackson County
BrentM
Mr. Turkey
|
Mr. Turkey
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340
Jackson County
|
Quiet Turkeys is directly related to predator pressure simple as that. This brings me back to predator control. WAY too much focus on people killing them and no viable predator habitat solutions.[/quote] It has a lot to do with predators and habitat. That's why turkeys that live in thick places where timber has been cut and have to walk skidder roads generally don't gobble very well. Weather has a big effect on gobbling too
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: N2TRKYS]
#1621455
01/22/16 05:34 AM
01/22/16 05:34 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340 Jackson County
BrentM
Mr. Turkey
|
Mr. Turkey
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340
Jackson County
|
I haven't forgotten about weather patterns, predation, or habitat. The theory I've had and have seen proven true includes all of those factors.
What theory is that ?
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: BrentM]
#1621552
01/22/16 07:11 AM
01/22/16 07:11 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,246 Lamar Co, AL
BamaGuitarDude
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,246
Lamar Co, AL
|
I don't think I've ever seen a "killer" that was a jake shooter. I guess maybe there are some folks that greedy but I don't think I've ever known one. Be glad.
ALDeer physics: for every opinion, there's an equal & opposite opinion
A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#1621689
01/22/16 09:11 AM
01/22/16 09:11 AM
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
Ok..Ill put in my 2 cents worth. I think a lot of hens start getting bred before the season starts...and then ALL through the season. Heres a pic of 2 gobblers with hens beginning of March. Hes with her because hes breeding her... Remember this picture..Im going to show you more from the same spot. It is a road into a food plot. I kill gobbler after gobbler here every year...Most dont gobble except MAYBE on the limb once or twice. The reason? THEYVE GOT GIRLS..they dont need to attract more and call in other gobblers to steal their chicks! Also Ive seen gobblers breed multiple hens in one morning many times. Heck...Ive even seen strutting jakes tend more then one hen in a field in one am. I dont feel the problem is lack of breeding in the turkey woods thats for sure. And while some areas of Alabama (like where I live) have little to no turkeys..I can drive 30- 45 minutes and be where there are higher huntable populations. I dont think the problem where I live is from hunting. No one CAN hunt them here legally at ALL. They just had a die off. They were here for a few years...looking like a huntable amount...then GONE the next. I like the limit at 5 to be honest. A LOT! In 13 years here in Alabama I have been fortunate enough to tag out every year but one. That year I shot 3 in Bama...but killed 9 more in other states. I love turkey hunting and I love eating turkey. The last 2 years I was done by April 5th Or so. Tagged out and people around where I hunt thinking there were hardly any birds...you could hardly even get a bird to gobble is what they said to me,...No more birds! Id just shake my head and tag out with birds that just werent GOBBLING hardly at all. They were just walking around with groups of hens strutting and breeding them. They had gotten all worked up about a SOUND a male turkey makes. They didnt hear it...must not be any birds left! I guess in their minds..no gobble SOUND..no gobblers. SMDH! I cant eat a sound..I kill turkeys..not the noise they make. They would walk all over..calling everywhere...buggering non gobblin birds. Id try to tell them.."THEY JUST ARENT GOBBLING MUCH!" Set up where you usually kill them and call them in. Nope..they just kept walking all over owl hooting..crow calling..coyote calling. Theyd come back beat..Id be done by 8 am with another non gobblin bird. Id set up where I always kill birds and call them in. Usually by calling in the hen. And heck..many times shed be making a racket cutting back to me..me cutting at her..and the gobbler STILL wouldnt gobble. Theyd tell me they would rather not kill one then hunt like that. Id say youd rather run around trying to get a turkey who IS NOT going to gobble..to gobble? Good luck with that! Id stake out some blind material in front of me..throw out a couple decoys and call a bit. Soon..Id see a hen enter the field...then a few more..then see a big old gobbler strutting in behind em and whack em. Or Id get close to where they usually roost and call as it got light...and here them flydown..then spitting..then when I saw them...BOOM! Theyd show up 3 hours later worn out...and never hear or see a bird. I feel that gobblers just dont gobble much early season. As it warms up...and hens nest...they gobble MORE and are easier to hear and then get on. I feel a big thing may be the turkeys reaction to predators. Lots of coyotes and bobcats....I think theyve learned to be quieter. After I tagged out by April 5th...I still left my cameras out . All where roads or gas lines enter food plots...natural travel corridors. Now heres pictures FROM the same spot AFTER I was tagged out. Mind you that I killed two birds from that very spot, and even up until I did I didnt hear but a handful of gobbles all season. My friends thought I must of killed all the birds. LOL. and these pics are from Another camera i ran on a different plot where I shot 2 gobblers as well off of. The gobblers werent all dead like they thought. Or NO gobblers like they thought. There were a bunch of dang birds left. Just henned up and keeping quiet. So just because you DONT hear gobblers..doesnt mean there ARENT gobblers is what Im trying to say!
Last edited by outdoorobsession; 01/22/16 09:49 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#1621704
01/22/16 09:23 AM
01/22/16 09:23 AM
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
and on a side note..I always try to be ethical and law abiding...but after harvesting my 5...I finish!
I dont go shoot more then my limit...though I easily could have killed a couple of these dang birds.
Got to follow the law...even though as a die hard turkey hunter it tears me up to be home during the season and not huntin.
Doesnt say i wasnt tempted though..lol. Last year I just took another guy from here that hunted my club and he killed 2 more.
I hate game hogs who will shoot over the limit. Thats lame to me. Leave some for other folks.
Anyways..thats my opinion. Keep the seasons and limit the same.
but if you do shoot your 5 get the heck out of the woods...or if you are in them be with another hunter and call him i his bird and leave your shotgun at home.
Last edited by outdoorobsession; 01/22/16 09:27 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1621712
01/22/16 09:37 AM
01/22/16 09:37 AM
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
I still stand by that a 3 bird limit with an an accurate way to document and tag harvest is the way to help the overall population.
Getting back to the subject of this thread, explain how saving 2,000 gobblers out of the harvest each year would "help the overall population". Understanding that the population would be 2,000 more out of a population of 400,000. What difference would 2,000 make out of 400,000 (one HALF of one percent more!!!) Would these extra gobblers "help the population" increase somehow? The premise the State is presenting is that we are having a decline in numbers (as are ALL turkey States) caused by lowered reproduction and poult recruitment. Factors responsible for this are speculatied (correctly in my opinion) to be weather, predators and habitat changes. So PCP posed the question as to HOW lowering the harvest of adult gobblers will change this reproduction problem? I heard one of the CAB members discuss this same issue: We are having a decline, It is caused by lowered reproduction factors and the reasons for lowered reproduction are weather, predators and habitat, therefore we want to limit harvest of adult gobblers!! Makes NO sense to me! This is what I see as the problem. You want to help turkeys..kill those dang predators whenever you can. Im pretty sure most hens are getting bred somehow...so restricting the harvest of male birds would have very negligible results IMO.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: ]
#1621725
01/22/16 09:46 AM
01/22/16 09:46 AM
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
I've got to go to a meeting that will last well into the evening. I'll be back tomorrow. Is that what you and the wife call it Matt? a "meeting"??? Just kidding buddy. Good to see your opinion...but you dang fish and game govt dudes are just trying to make it so I cant even eat. 3 dang birds??? That SUCKS! ...just saying! What the heck can I do after the first 2 weeks of the season then???
Last edited by outdoorobsession; 01/22/16 09:47 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: ]
#1621887
01/22/16 12:03 PM
01/22/16 12:03 PM
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,678 Alabama
Honolua
I'm Honey Lou Lou and I voted for Obama... Twice!!!
|
I'm Honey Lou Lou and I voted for Obama... Twice!!!
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,678
Alabama
|
I still stand by that a 3 bird limit with an an accurate way to document and tag harvest is the way to help the overall population.
Getting back to the subject of this thread, explain how saving 2,000 gobblers out of the harvest each year would "help the overall population". Understanding that the population would be 2,000 more out of a population of 400,000. What difference would 2,000 make out of 400,000 (one HALF of one percent more!!!) Would these extra gobblers "help the population" increase somehow? The premise the State is presenting is that we are having a decline in numbers (as are ALL turkey States) caused by lowered reproduction and poult recruitment. Factors responsible for this are speculatied (correctly in my opinion) to be weather, predators and habitat changes. So PCP posed the question as to HOW lowering the harvest of adult gobblers will change this reproduction problem? I heard one of the CAB members discuss this same issue: We are having a decline, It is caused by lowered reproduction factors and the reasons for lowered reproduction are weather, predators and habitat, therefore we want to limit harvest of adult gobblers!! Makes NO sense to me! This is what I see as the problem. You want to help turkeys..kill those dang predators whenever you can. Im pretty sure most hens are getting bred somehow...so restricting the harvest of male birds would have very negligible results IMO. Can I come hunt that plot?
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#1622067
01/22/16 02:18 PM
01/22/16 02:18 PM
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
heck..I bet you could come AFTER I tag out and stand a good chance between those two plots.
I hate to say though,,thats a coal mine now. Broke my heart. Both those plots are!!
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#1622080
01/22/16 02:25 PM
01/22/16 02:25 PM
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
outdoorobsession
Unregistered
|
I ended hunting there after that being where I started when I first joined. Killed a 150 inch buck there my first year too.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: Anonymous]
#1622357
01/22/16 04:55 PM
01/22/16 04:55 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252 South Alabama
gobbler
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252
South Alabama
|
However, I think in the near future you'll see us getting out in front of issues just like this and trying to educate the public on how to help themselves. Educate I just want to ask this, Why do y'all keep coming up with the state changing the limit or the season? It seems to me that y'all are subject to having information I don't. Y'all are saying these things as if they're going to happen. Where do you base these opinions from? Probably because you said that if the state reduced the limit from 5 to 3 it would save 12% of the turkey population each year. Among the other things that PCP said, how about listening to a radio interview last weekend with one of the CAB members who said unequivocally that 1) we are having a decline, 2) we need to go to 3 bird limit and 3) he noted the turkey committee giving these suggestions, and 4) he said we are not raising enough poults and the main reason for the decline were weather, habitat and predators. I didn't have time to call since I was working but I wanted to ask him what the gobbler limit had to do with weather, habitat and predators or poult recruitment. Based on my usual answers to this inquiry I just figured I would be considered a argumentative azzhole.
Last edited by gobbler; 01/22/16 04:57 PM.
I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1622376
01/22/16 05:06 PM
01/22/16 05:06 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,958 LASW
turkey247
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,958
LASW
|
However, I think in the near future you'll see us getting out in front of issues just like this and trying to educate the public on how to help themselves. Educate I just want to ask this, Why do y'all keep coming up with the state changing the limit or the season? It seems to me that y'all are subject to having information I don't. Y'all are saying these things as if they're going to happen. Where do you base these opinions from? Probably because you said that if the state reduced the limit from 5 to 3 it would save 12% of the turkey population each year. Among the other things that PCP said, how about listening to a radio interview last weekend with one of the CAB members who said unequivocally that 1) we are having a decline, 2) we need to go to 3 bird limit and 3) he noted the turkey committee giving these suggestions, and 4) he said we are not raising enough poults and the main reason for the decline were weather, habitat and predators. I didn't have time to call since I was working but I wanted to ask him what the gobbler limit had to do with weather, habitat and predators or poult recruitment. Based on my usual answers to this inquiry I just figured I would be considered a argumentative azzhole. I didn't hear that interview. But it makes me sick to my stomach that there's a CAB member that either - believes what he's saying, or succumbing to political pressure. And I am referencing the NEED for the state (assuming entire state) to drop straight from 5 to 3.
Last edited by turkey247; 01/22/16 05:13 PM.
|
|
|
|