|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 registered members (metalmuncher, Johnal3, catdoctor, bhammedic84, Frankie, Coosa1, Joe4majors, CNC, Turkeyneck78, Claims Rep., doublefistful, Dubie, BearBranch, Skinner, 3Gs, CarbonClimber1, AlabamaPhi, Gobble4me757, bamaeyedoc, Ryano, farmerjay, auman, rwh1, Longtine, Standbanger, desertdog, specialk, jawbone, DoubleCreek, SuperSpike, Ben2, AU338MAG, cullbuck, 2 invisible),
641
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
GIS question
#1646024
02/09/16 03:21 PM
02/09/16 03:21 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,319
Orange Beach, Al
Rickybobby
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,319
Orange Beach, Al
|
Didn't find this out until midway through the season but I looked at the GIS for the property I leased this season and it says the parcels are 139 and 85 when it was represented to me as 200 and 139.
Is the GIS that accurate or does it just ballpark it by measuring the flat surface area and not taking into account the terrain
At times my ambition far exceeds my talent.
|
|
|
|
