Tags
by jwalker77. 01/15/25 11:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
152 registered members (M48scout, Ridge Life, Chiller, AL18, globe, Coosa1, tmhrmh1, Marengo hunter, BigA47, Fishminer91, aubigmac, Bread, Luxfisher, 7PTSPREAD, hawndog, Avengedsevenfold, Evan smith, canichols424, ShaftOne, DGAMBLER, Austin1, beano1, Bandit635, jameyr, Holcomb, Beer Belly, Narrow Gap, Driveby, DixieRidge, abolt300, gman, AustinC, brianr, Fattyfireplug, AJones, BradB, General, jdhunter2011, MC21, cullbuck, AU coonhunter, toyota05, metalmuncher, RidgeRanger, Downwind, bobbyc, trailertrash, Spotchaser8, TwentySeven, OutdoorBug, JLMiller, jwalker77, EdE King, huntndad, Backwards cowboy, thayerp81, PanolaProductions, Overland, Sus scrofa Reduction Specialist, WC82, BCLC, Turkeyneck78, twaldrop4, JA, Bows4evr, JRigs10, Fishduck, IMISSALDEER, Okatuppa, Fullthrottle, BentBarrel, cdaddy14, akbejeepin, dwoliver, burbank, lefthorn, Turkey, Tracker, Bulls eye, BibbCo, Emile, geeb1, HHSyelper, 1hunter, Darrylcom, KnightRyder, Geeb, IDOT, Dano, chuck216, 7mmMag, mule34, Dean, outdoorguy88, Gobble4me757, canine933, 3006bullet, russellb, Powers, Standbanger, SC53, coldtrail, JAS, 1bamashooter, BamaBoHunter, quickshot, dtmwtp, longshot, Jweeks, mjs14, TSB, Scout308, foldemup, beeline08, Fleahopmayor, BurningBright, dave260rem!, blade, GomerPyle, Crawfish, hallb, slim68, 000buck, Floorman1, Frankie, ParrotHead89, Bronco 74, jchurch, capehorn24, ronfromramer, TexasHuntress, RAmerica, Bigem1958, USeeMSpurs, Turberville, hue, Ryano, daylate, Bamarich2, jaredhunts, turfarmer, SouthBamaSlayer, Shotts2000, 9 invisible),
2,399
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662431
02/23/16 03:45 PM
02/23/16 03:45 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121 Right behind you
Mbrock
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121
Right behind you
|
AU and the turkey committee have been collaborating for a couple of years now on this problem. AU is simply providing the information from the population models we ran given different season structures and bag limits. The entire committee, from our staff to AU is completely unbiased. No one is pushing an agenda. Chuck was sharing this information, so I guess he was the spokesperson for the findings. We hope to fine tune the model with real mortality and survival numbers collected from AL turkeys in current research, not research conducted 23 years ago from MS, LA, or SC. The committee is making a dang honest and informed effort at being proactive, instead of reactive. No knee jerk reactions are being proposed. It should be understood that we ALL understand the driving factors for turkey populations. Trust me. It's all about nest success. Plain and simple. For some reason, or combination of reasons, nest success has declined over the entire southeast USA. Could it be predators? They can absolutely be a key player. Could it be habitat changes? It could absolutely be a key player. Could it be weather? It could absolutely be a key a player. Could it be disease? It absolutely could. It could be a combination of all of the above. Unfortunately the state has much less control over those variables than we do season structure and bag limits. Given the information currently available season structure changes alone, or in combination with lowered bag limits, could potentially slow the decline. Potentially. To think we haven't looked into this from all angles is not giving us enough credit. All Chuck did was present this at the CAB meeting. A proposal was not made. No one said we were going to do anything. It was simply stated that AU and the turkey committee are weighing options that could benefit the resource and meet the desires of hunters. And quite honestly, we aren't hearing ANY complaining except from the people who think they have to kill 5 birds every year. To heck with the resource or your science. By gosh I'm killing my 5, and don't care what anyone else does. In the stakeholder meetings we had with avid turkey hunters, we received their feedback on satisfaction regarding various aspects of turkey hunting. Hearing birds gobble ranked as high, and even higher on some surveys, than actually killing a turkey. People want to hear turkeys. They want to know there are turkeys out there to hunt, whether they kill them or not. Most were in agreement that they would rather change the season and/or bag if it meant more turkeys, even if that meant killing fewer birds. We have received a lot of complaints over the last few years about turkey numbers, and people are demanding something be done. I wish we had a total log of all phone calls regarding turkey declines. It is real. It's being taken seriously. We've been looking at this going on nearly two years now from the beginning discussions. We meet several times a year. We have spent weeks pouring over research, papers, surveys, and data to propose a solid, defendable plan. I am assuming there will be a plan submitted soon.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662438
02/23/16 03:49 PM
02/23/16 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,231 Central Alabama
Yelp softly
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,231
Central Alabama
|
I don't find it odd that populations have decreased in some areas. Populations fluctuate. That is natural and to be expected.
Second, what do you think gobblers are doing to benefit populations other than breeding hens? Alternating nesting time to give the hen a break? Fighting off coons, coyotes, and other predators? Eating privet bushes to improve habitat? I just don't see any logic there You don't get it. I'm suggesting that maybe we don't know everything there is to know about turkeys. Maybe there's some stuff we don't understand. If we understood it all, the population decline wouldn't be inexplicable would it? The burden of proof is not on me, my friend. There's a problem that is widely recognized, yet no one knows why. Yet, many would contend status quo should b sufficient. Please. If we know so much about turkeys, kindly explain the sharp decline. Don't give me the cyclical population garb. All biologists understand population cycles. That has nothing to do with the NWTF recognizing a sharp decline across the Southeast US. I would love to talk to someone from AU to verify that but have had no luck getting someone to talk to. Yet We will agree on this. As AU alumni, it's my opinion that they should stick to research and stay up he hell out of policy making. If you have data, present it. If not, don't try to influence policy. If you hear anything in regards to this subject, let me know.
"When there was no fowl, we ate crawdad, when there was no crawdad, we ate sand."
"YOU ATE SAND!" - Raising Arizona
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: Southwood7]
#1662440
02/23/16 03:49 PM
02/23/16 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121 Right behind you
Mbrock
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121
Right behind you
|
I read an AON article tonight, it may have been written by Mike Bolton that the tweaks to turkey season actually came from Auburn Dept of Wildlife and Forestry. Are you sure your information is right, or is Mr. Bolton wrong? The presentation at the CAB was made by the director and referenced that Auburn recommends reducing the limit and shortening the season. I would love to talk to someone from AU to verify that but have had no luck getting someone to talk to. Yet Please share the info with us when you find out! No need to wait on gobblers response. I answered it above.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: Mbrock]
#1662454
02/23/16 03:57 PM
02/23/16 03:57 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708 Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
Southwood7
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708
Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
|
I read an AON article tonight, it may have been written by Mike Bolton that the tweaks to turkey season actually came from Auburn Dept of Wildlife and Forestry. Are you sure your information is right, or is Mr. Bolton wrong? The presentation at the CAB was made by the director and referenced that Auburn recommends reducing the limit and shortening the season. I would love to talk to someone from AU to verify that but have had no luck getting someone to talk to. Yet Please share the info with us when you find out! No need to wait on gobblers response. I answered it above. Thank you
Last edited by Southwood7; 02/23/16 03:57 PM.
The Spirit of God has made me; the breath of the Almighty gives me life. Job 33:4
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662459
02/23/16 04:01 PM
02/23/16 04:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,142 North Jackson
ridgestalker
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,142
North Jackson
|
Clear cutting without fire later is a big problem.
"The Heavens declare the glory of God;and the firmament sheweth his handiwork" Pslam 19:1
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: Mbrock]
#1662475
02/23/16 04:08 PM
02/23/16 04:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340 Jackson County
BrentM
Mr. Turkey
|
Mr. Turkey
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340
Jackson County
|
And quite honestly, we aren't hearing ANY complaining except from the people who think they have to kill 5 birds every year. To heck with the resource or your science. By gosh I'm killing my 5, and don't care what anyone else does. Nobody here believes that for a second and its childish as hell to even say it. You must realize that you are lumping well over half of the aldeer turkey hunters into that category with that comment. I was afraid that the state was gonna try to make the folks that wanna preserve Alabama's turkey hunting tradition out to be bloodthirsty bad guys. Looks like that's exactly what their agenda is and what their talking points are gonna be.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662478
02/23/16 04:10 PM
02/23/16 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708 Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
Southwood7
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708
Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
|
Matt, if the recommendation comes down to move back the season start date back, would we gain days on the back end or simply have a shorter season.
The Spirit of God has made me; the breath of the Almighty gives me life. Job 33:4
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662485
02/23/16 04:12 PM
02/23/16 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,921 Huntsville
buckbrush
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,921
Huntsville
|
Gobbler I can answer all of your questions as to why this is being done. It's called job security. Big gov always has to change things up alittle bit as to show there is a reason for their existence. That is why not one person has answered your question as to why none of the other states have seen population increases from lowering the limit Georgia is a prime example.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: BrentM]
#1662488
02/23/16 04:14 PM
02/23/16 04:14 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121 Right behind you
Mbrock
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121
Right behind you
|
And quite honestly, we aren't hearing ANY complaining except from the people who think they have to kill 5 birds every year. To heck with the resource or your science. By gosh I'm killing my 5, and don't care what anyone else does. Nobody here believes that for a second and its childish as hell to even say it. You must realize that you are lumping well over half of the aldeer turkey hunters into that category with that comment. I was afraid that the state was gonna try to make the folks that wanna preserve Alabama's turkey hunting tradition out to be bloodthirsty bad guys. Looks like that's exactly what their agenda is and what their talking points are gonna be. Wrong. And for the record, I am not wanting to reduce the bag. If that's what they decide to do I will support it, but it's not my desire. I like killing 5 too if I can. Lump me in with the bloodthirsty bad guys.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: Mbrock]
#1662502
02/23/16 04:20 PM
02/23/16 04:20 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252 South Alabama
gobbler
OP
12 point
|
OP
12 point
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252
South Alabama
|
AU and the turkey committee have been collaborating for a couple of years now on this problem. AU is simply providing the information from the population models we ran given different season structures and bag limits. The entire committee, from our staff to AU is completely unbiased. No one is pushing an agenda. Chuck was sharing this information, so I guess he was the spokesperson for the findings. We hope to fine tune the model with real mortality and survival numbers collected from AL turkeys in current research, not research conducted 23 years ago from MS, LA, or SC. The committee is making a dang honest and informed effort at being proactive, instead of reactive. No knee jerk reactions are being proposed. It should be understood that we ALL understand the driving factors for turkey populations. Trust me. It's all about nest success. Plain and simple. For some reason, or combination of reasons, nest success has declined over the entire southeast USA. Could it be predators? They can absolutely be a key player. Could it be habitat changes? It could absolutely be a key player. Could it be weather? It could absolutely be a key a player. Could it be disease? It absolutely could. It could be a combination of all of the above. Unfortunately the state has much less control over those variables than we do season structure and bag limits. Given the information currently available season structure changes alone, or in combination with lowered bag limits, could potentially slow the decline. Potentially. To think we haven't looked into this from all angles is not giving us enough credit. All Chuck did was present this at the CAB meeting. A proposal was not made. No one said we were going to do anything. It was simply stated that AU and the turkey committee are weighing options that could benefit the resource and meet the desires of hunters. And quite honestly, we aren't hearing ANY complaining except from the people who think they have to kill 5 birds every year. To heck with the resource or your science. By gosh I'm killing my 5, and don't care what anyone else does. In the stakeholder meetings we had with avid turkey hunters, we received their feedback on satisfaction regarding various aspects of turkey hunting. Hearing birds gobble ranked as high, and even higher on some surveys, than actually killing a turkey. People want to hear turkeys. They want to know there are turkeys out there to hunt, whether they kill them or not. Most were in agreement that they would rather change the season and/or bag if it meant more turkeys, even if that meant killing fewer birds. We have received a lot of complaints over the last few years about turkey numbers, and people are demanding something be done. I wish we had a total log of all phone calls regarding turkey declines. It is real. It's being taken seriously. We've been looking at this going on nearly two years now from the beginning discussions. We meet several times a year. We have spent weeks pouring over research, papers, surveys, and data to propose a solid, defendable plan. I am assuming there will be a plan submitted soon. So why isn't GA a MUCH better turkey State than Alabama in regards to turkeys? It already has the recommended limits and season? And quite honestly, we aren't hearing ANY complaining except from the people who think they have to kill 5 birds every year. To heck with the resource or your science. By gosh I'm killing my 5, and don't care what anyone else does. Don't mischaracterize the blowback or arguments against lowering the limit! If you think we make comments to try to twist your words, don't twist ours! It is NOT about me or anyone else killing 5. I suspect you may be hearing plenty of complaints now! Matter of fact you are hearing them here! Listen. When we did the 3 buck limit, we had AU surveys looking at what was killed and public perception. However it was WEIGHED among a committee of State, Fed, Non-profit and private biologists, land managers and research scientists. We weighed all the opinions among the stakeholder representative groups. This data presented to the CAB is simply AU researchers punching weak, theoretical data into a computer simulation and spitting out recommendations. I would be surprised if any of the AU researchers doing the modelling even turkey hunt - VERY surprised! Your turkey committee wasn't even involved, just AU. How broad is the stakeholder representation on your committee? Matt, if we are going to simply let computer models set our seasons and limits, then why do we need to pay the State to have Biologists? And I really want to know why GA sucks if they already have the limits and seasons we seem to be gong to? Got a computer model to explain that?
Last edited by gobbler; 02/23/16 04:27 PM.
I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662506
02/23/16 04:24 PM
02/23/16 04:24 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,999 Holly Pond, AL
NightHunter
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,999
Holly Pond, AL
|
Don't take this personal Brent but I don't think anyone has room to be calling us childish in this or any recent thread. Sometimes the truth hurts and anecdotally anyway, our evidence is that most folks complaining are the ones that kill or reasonably expect to kill a limit every year or two. This holds true to the folks I know that don't like it.
This process can be done correctly and benefit ALL turkey hunters and more importantly the turkeys. That is what I hope happens. I guess we will all see.
Last edited by NightHunter; 02/23/16 04:26 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: NightHunter]
#1662515
02/23/16 04:30 PM
02/23/16 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,149 Hoover
burbank
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,149
Hoover
|
No need to sugar coat it. That is the truth. We heard the same thing with the three buck limits. Don't take this personal Brent but I don't think anyone has room to be calling us childish in this or any recent thread. Sometimes the truth hurts and anecdotally anyway, our evidence is that most folks complaining are the ones that kill or reasonably expect to kill a limit every year or two. This holds true to the folks I know that don't like it.
This process can be done correctly and benefit ALL turkey hunters. That is what I hope happens. I guess we will all see.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662516
02/23/16 04:30 PM
02/23/16 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121 Right behind you
Mbrock
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,121
Right behind you
|
This is exactly why I left the forum a few weeks ago. It's not that I can't take the heat, am sensitive as I've been called, or don't enjoy debating. I have freaking better things to do with my time than sit on an internet forum for HOURS after I get off work, and have the responsibility of taking care of my very own family, including three small kids. I comment, then that comment requires three more follow up comments, then the next thing you know I've neglected the people in my life that really matter, to piss away time arguing with a bunch of folks that have differing opinions. I'm out. Maybe for good this time. You need to know anything about the turkey committee, AU research, or 1 bird quail limits you can call Chuck, or the District Office when I'm at work.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662528
02/23/16 04:36 PM
02/23/16 04:36 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252 South Alabama
gobbler
OP
12 point
|
OP
12 point
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252
South Alabama
|
Well.... bummer,,,. Nighthunter, can you take a shot at this one So why isn't GA a MUCH better turkey State than Alabama in regards to turkeys? It already has the recommended limits and season?
I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662529
02/23/16 04:36 PM
02/23/16 04:36 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,169 Tuscaloosa, Ralph,Fosters
Turkeyboy
6 point
|
6 point
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,169
Tuscaloosa, Ralph,Fosters
|
Interesting that DCNRs annual survey does not have a category for "Habitat Loss" in item number 8 that asks what we think is most detrimental to reduced turkey numbers. Also a bit strange the percentages don't add up to 100 percent. In the areas I hunt I would say habitat loss is the number one detriments factor, with predators second .
The Earth is Gods footstool
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: BrentM]
#1662536
02/23/16 04:39 PM
02/23/16 04:39 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,487
Atoler
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,487
|
[quote=Mbrock] And quite honestly, we aren't hearing ANY complaining except from the people who think they have to kill 5 birds every year. To heck with the resource or your science. By gosh I'm killing my 5, and don't care what anyone else does. Matt, I'm sure that people who have the ability to kill more than 3 are the squeakiest wheel. Why is that a surprise. . We are the very small segment of turkey hunters being affected by this potential change. Hopefully some real diagnosis of the problem comes out of yalls research, instead of punting and saving a few thousand gobblers a year statewide.
|
|
|
Re: Somebody make a biological case for a later season or lower limit?
[Re: gobbler]
#1662538
02/23/16 04:41 PM
02/23/16 04:41 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708 Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
Southwood7
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708
Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
|
Matt's retired atoler.... Or is he???
Last edited by Southwood7; 02/23/16 04:52 PM.
The Spirit of God has made me; the breath of the Almighty gives me life. Job 33:4
|
|
|
|