|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 registered members (Bushmaster, BrandonClark, courseup, Fattyfireplug, ParrotHead89, Slider, chris18, Ben2, DoubleShoalsJR, fur_n_feathers, Tall Dog, dave260rem!, OutdoorsAL, Hunting-231, Flyliner, Gobble4me757, JHL, crenshawco, Brent, Fatalis, Big AL 76, Bustinbeards, Backwards cowboy, gman, mcninja, M48scout, LostinTX, bhammedic84, hootn, kpswihart, G1Eagle, RCHRR, Ray_Coon, jsubrett6, sj22, BigA47, Solothurn, Bruno, Bronco 74, Wapiti55, Chaser357, outdoorguy88, CatfishJunkie, Bread, rickyh_2, Fullthrottle, apolloslade, Tree Dweller, Browning7Mag, StateLine, 5 invisible),
515
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Game Check Scenario
[Re: Shocktop]
#1766557
06/21/16 09:41 AM
06/21/16 09:41 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
Gulfcrest
bigt
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
Gulfcrest
|
How is it that for over 60 years the Alabama deer population has survived and even thrived without Game Check? It has not been thriving for a long time in my area..... Then you obviously need to stop hunting that area. You didn't need gamecheck to tell you that. Waiting on the state to "fix" that area for them. Well the State is the one that screwed it up to begin with with liberal doe seasons and pushing the thought that you can't kill too many does and all the while still allowing the buck a day limit go for way too long with the wholesale slaughter of the buck makers. We would have never needed buck limits if they would have started with a more conservative approach to the doe season. The problem they created can not be fixed by education only it will take some sort of adjustment to the doe season in areas hurting and if more data is needed for the biologist to convince the CAB then I am in support of it.
|
|
|
|
