It called money talks and BS walks.

It's probably more like WTH does a pumpkin have to do with a deer.....

Having a laptop helps with that. I can stay online and not miss what's going on in the house all at the same time. Would you believe that I'm really a shy, introverted guy? I didn't think so. LOL War Eagle to you too bud!

LOL! If you read the bet again you see that loser covers the broadhead cost too. I would only be out the cost of the broadheads for a short time.


People will say that anything mechanical can fail. And while technically true they never consider the probability of such an event. There are many things that while possible are at the same time so unlikely as to push right to the brink of impossible. These type broadheads open via a simple hinge mechanism. Push on the front of the blade and they swing open. About as simple and foolproof as it gets. The original poster claims that none of the 3 blades on the reaper opened. The 3 blades on a Reaper work completely independently of one another. So what is actually being alleged here (whether it's realized or not) is that not one, not two but three simple hinges on all three blades failed simultaneously. The odds of one failing are very long. The odds of two failing are in the Florida lottery range. The odds of all three failing (outside of deliberate sabotage) are so astronomical they would be into the billions to one.

If you have 30 deer you can produce on demand for the test then that's fine with me.

What the hell does a pumpkin have to do with deer X10.....

are pumpkins the new "test medium" for broadhead testing or is that just a Pine Hill thang?????

why don't you(Todd) just quit beating around the bush and call the man a liar or idiot..you pick which.....

dangitman......the broadhead just might have failed to open and you've slammed his arse for several pages over nothing......

Don't like my posts Fred then don't read them. So simple even you can manage it.

yer too easy Todd......

Only when my wife gets me drunk.

Hell Fred, it's impossible for something mechanical to fail. Haven't you been reading the posts? He must be a big, big man. I sure as hell hope he is. He can call me what he wants behind his computers safety blanket, but if he does it in person, then I've got a side bet you guys can get in on.

Is that a threat? LOL! You reaaaallly don't want to go there.

Sounds like some pee-pees are getting stepped on....

Back to the fixed blade must hit where the field point does to be tuned theory....I disagree. The faster a setup is, the more fidgety it "CAN" become. I've tried to tune some setups to be the same and couldn't get it with the existing bow, arrow, BH combination. Usually the BH hit about 3" off to the left (RH) and no rest adjustment, poundage adjustment would make a difference. But when you cut vanes at 40 yards and the arrows hit vertically on a plumb line, the set up is tuned. Maybe buying a stiffer spine arrow would make the difference. But it's not needed when arrow flight is good and groups are tight.

I wasn't there .So the Grim Reaper may have Failed.But I have to ask why you would shoot a deer 5 yards less that it was?You said you ranged it for 35 and shoot it for 30.That would make you thinks shot placement may have been a little off.

I offered them a fair bet. But they just want to take jabs and ponder about me getting my ass whipped. Tells me all I need to know about the strength of their convictions on the matter.

Sorry you didn't find it today Fur.

Believe it or not me too. Hate that he lost a deer.

No, it's not a threat. It's a promise. I've sat here and read you post six ways to Sunday about how I have no idea what I'm talking about. How this, that and the other had to happen. Throwing your FACTS around. I'm tired of it. So either STFU, or we can meet wherever you wish and settle this one way, or the other.

I don't like to shoot "between" pins, and any deer here is going to jump the string.

fair bet??? what the hell are you smoking???? Pumpkin??????