|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
120 registered members (Hornhntr, Gulfcoast, auman, blade, AccurateNumber9, 7PTSPREAD, Spotchaser8, akbejeepin, Cousneddy, Lonster, Wahoo, JCL, XVIII, SharpSpur, Huntn2feed5, ttsam, TurkeyJoe, ALPatriot15, cartervj, Okatuppa, outdoorguy88, jacannon, jtillery, BPI, jdhunter2011, CCC, Mdees, hallb, RAmerica, HHSyelper, Jerstwrt, Ray_Coon, Frogeye, Bmyers142, GrandSlam, Kang, G/H, Remington270, sj22, jhardy, Squatting Bear, BCLC, Ruger7mag, mdavis, JKlep, Buck slayer 15, CatfishJunkie, Turkeyneck78, gastoka, sanderson, Canterberry, Mbrock, Longtine, Mike32, Gut Pile 32, M48scout, trlrdrdave, foldemup, Woodslife, BamaFan64, dustymac, TexasHuntress, KnightRyder, cullbuck, MTeague, CNC, crenshawco, hawndog, BuckChaser, BACK40, DuckDown11, sawdust, T Bone, Turkey_neck, Khitzeman, PanolaProductions, pickenstj, howl, Jmfire722, cdaddy14, Daveleeal, Alb, BamaBoHunter, mccarrc, IVEY, janiemae, m2ruger, Ryano, Big Buck Video, oakachoy, bamamed1, Marengo hunter, desertdog, donia, odocoileus, kaintuck, BearBranch, Thread Killer, CeeHawk37, Bass1971, Bandit635, MarkCollin, dsmc, CouchNapper, beeline08, canichols424, OutdoorBug, Turkey, 12 invisible),
2,392
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: ridgestalker]
#2172592
07/21/17 12:26 PM
07/21/17 12:26 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708 Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
Southwood7
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,708
Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
|
Consider the story of Naaman. This man has leprosy and ask what must he do to be healed. He is told to dip in the Jordan River 7 times to be healed.Do you think the Jordan River had some healing qualities all of a sudden that would cure leprosy? I'm sure to him it sounded silly that getting in the river would cure his un curable disease,however he did it thru faith in God and he was healed. The water had nothing to do with but the faith that it would did. Baptism is no different.If you believe that Bible Water Baptism is for the remission of sins. There isn't one example of a person praying and receiving salvation in the NT. I grew up in the Baptist church I completly understand where your coming from,but when I got older and began to study my Bible I saw many things were missing and other things had been added. I hope everybody goes to heaven and I'm no better than anyone. But why take a chance on doing things not in the Bible? We are told that on judgement many believers that had done many good thing in the name of religion are going to be lost? That scares me when thinking about eternity. Simple direct question. Do you and/or church of Christ hold the belief that if I am not baptized while believing that act of baptism saves me, then I am going to hell? Romans 10:9-10 9 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.
The Spirit of God has made me; the breath of the Almighty gives me life. Job 33:4
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: bill]
#2172618
07/21/17 12:49 PM
07/21/17 12:49 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,685 West Florida
westflgator
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,685
West Florida
|
I don't go to be entertained. ^^^ This The songs are supposed to be praise and worship based with the focus on God, not us. If your focus is on worshipping him you should be able to do that in either style. Too many churches are tripping over things that don't matter like the color of the carpet or the song set list instead of putting the focus where it is supposed to be. Sometimes , the preaching that follows the singing is just as geared toward pleasing the congregation as the song choices. Well said
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: R_H_Clark]
#2172623
07/21/17 12:55 PM
07/21/17 12:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,165 North Jackson
ridgestalker
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,165
North Jackson
|
I have a question for the church of Christ folks..
Why is it so important to you to defend the belief that baptism is a necessary step in salvation? I don't know of a Protestant Christian denomination that doesn't baptize believers so by default we are saved even if we believe we were saved before we were baptized.
Is Church of Christ the only denomination You might as well give up. They will never go against their church doctrine and tradition.To do so they would have to give up their part in salvation. R H Clarke may I ask what denomination you belong to? By the way the body of Christ isn't a denomination.
"The Heavens declare the glory of God;and the firmament sheweth his handiwork" Pslam 19:1
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: 300gr]
#2172629
07/21/17 01:03 PM
07/21/17 01:03 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,685 West Florida
westflgator
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,685
West Florida
|
I like a little of both. Serious question for the COC members here, do you listen to the radio in your truck? Do you listen to Christian music anywhere other than church? If so, is it acapella? theres a difference between worship which is for God and whats for entertainment while driving. ? Of course people listen to the radio and multiple types of music. Why can't you worship God in your car while traveling to work, why is that classified as entertainment? Is it only worship if there is no music? I believe I can worship God anywhere just the same as I can pray anywhere. That doesn't negate the need for joining with the Body of Christ for congregational worship.
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: snakebit]
#2172650
07/21/17 01:29 PM
07/21/17 01:29 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,126 KY
AUstan23
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,126
KY
|
Bout to enter a popcorn-induced coma
It is easier to fool a man than to convince him he has been fooled.
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: ridgestalker]
#2172832
07/21/17 03:28 PM
07/21/17 03:28 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
I have a question for the church of Christ folks..
Why is it so important to you to defend the belief that baptism is a necessary step in salvation? I don't know of a Protestant Christian denomination that doesn't baptize believers so by default we are saved even if we believe we were saved before we were baptized.
Is Church of Christ the only denomination You might as well give up. They will never go against their church doctrine and tradition.To do so they would have to give up their part in salvation. R H Clarke may I ask what denomination you belong to? By the way the body of Christ isn't a denomination. Sure, I never went anywhere more than a handful of times growing up. Mostly Freewill Baptist,but I've been to Catholic and Church of God. I got saved in my back pasture after a night of partying when I was 29. The first thing I know God told me was to read the Bible. I read a lot of the OT and had read most of the NT when I decided I should be baptized(ironic isn't it,and I think everyone saved should be water baptized). I started calling churches and no one would say that they would baptize me if I came to church. I finally just went to the Freewill Baptist I had been to more than any other growing up. I asked to be baptized that first day. It took them about 3 weeks. I attended every service but I didn't like what I was hearing every service because it was different from what I was reading in my Bible. I got baptized and then asked about the baptism of the Holy Spirit which I was reading about. They gave me their handbook and I read it and never went back. Not long after, I went to a Non Denominational church and those are what I have attended every since. If you are COC I suppose I sounded harsh. I only do so however because of some of the hurtful things I've seen from that group. As a whole however the members have been like most other Christians ,Just good people trying to follow after God to the best of their ability. It's not the people I'm against. It's some of the doctrine. In one instance that baptism doctrine caused a man I was ministering to in prison, to try to commit suicide because a COC preacher told him that it didn't matter what he did he was going to Hell because he couldn't get baptized in Prison. Maybe he could have been baptized but that's not the point,because he felt betrayed anyway.He felt none of his repentance or crying out for God to save him meant a thing according to that COC preacher,so he said to he11 with it and took a bunch of pills he bought from other inmates. Sorry for the long answer .I just felt like it needed to be said.
Last edited by R_H_Clark; 07/21/17 03:30 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: Southwood7]
#2173222
07/22/17 08:39 AM
07/22/17 08:39 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111 The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
300gr
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111
The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
|
Simple direct question.
Do you and/or church of Christ hold the belief that if I am not baptized while believing that act of baptism saves me, then I am going to hell?
Romans 10:9-10
9 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved. I took a break from this discussion. I wasn't ignoring anyone. Let me say this. When I was baptized the first time I only did it because my brother wanted to be so in my mind I said why not. Fast forward years later God put it heavy on my heart that I had done it for the wrong reason so I was baptized a second time. Immediately the doubt left when I came up out of the water. If you doubt your baptism wasn't done in the right frame of mind then get dunked and remove all doubt.
Last edited by 300gr; 07/22/17 08:41 AM.
Two roads diverged in the woods and I took the one with deep ruts,hills and mud.It may be bumpy but WHAT A RIDE!
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: R_H_Clark]
#2173228
07/22/17 08:45 AM
07/22/17 08:45 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111 The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
300gr
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111
The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
|
I have a question for the church of Christ folks..
Why is it so important to you to defend the belief that baptism is a necessary step in salvation? I don't know of a Protestant Christian denomination that doesn't baptize believers so by default we are saved even if we believe we were saved before we were baptized.
Is Church of Christ the only denomination You might as well give up. They will never go against their church doctrine and tradition.To do so they would have to give up their part in salvation. No church doctrine. We just take the Bible as written. We will not go against the Bible and follow man's interjections. It doesn't mean we don't love our fellow man Or respect them. Some people are only following what they have been taught. What mom,dad,grandparents etc. The Bible wasn't written in a way that you have to be a holder of a PhD. It's plainly written for those who attempt to understand it.
Last edited by 300gr; 07/22/17 08:47 AM.
Two roads diverged in the woods and I took the one with deep ruts,hills and mud.It may be bumpy but WHAT A RIDE!
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: Southwood7]
#2173234
07/22/17 08:49 AM
07/22/17 08:49 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111 The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
300gr
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111
The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
|
I have a question for the church of Christ folks..
Why is it so important to you to defend the belief that baptism is a necessary step in salvation? I don't know of a Protestant Christian denomination that doesn't baptize believers so by default we are saved even if we believe we were saved before we were baptized.
Is Church of Christ the only denomination Because the Bible says so and that's the only rule book for the church and sinner. Easy to understand,easy to read if one will put forth the effort. I would suggest not reading commentaries which are man's opinions. I would also suggest not taking everything spoken by a preacher to be fact unless you fact check what's said in scripture. Look what happened to the chosen people(Israelites) they followed tradition and priests and were blind in doing so. We're their hearts on God? We're they correct? No, but the followers kept on with tradition for a large part . That's why Paul preached to the gentiles. Any argument that cannot be backed up by scripture is man's opinion.
Last edited by 300gr; 07/22/17 08:57 AM.
Two roads diverged in the woods and I took the one with deep ruts,hills and mud.It may be bumpy but WHAT A RIDE!
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: 300gr]
#2173248
07/22/17 09:05 AM
07/22/17 09:05 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
I have a question for the church of Christ folks..
Why is it so important to you to defend the belief that baptism is a necessary step in salvation? I don't know of a Protestant Christian denomination that doesn't baptize believers so by default we are saved even if we believe we were saved before we were baptized.
Is Church of Christ the only denomination You might as well give up. They will never go against their church doctrine and tradition.To do so they would have to give up their part in salvation. No church doctrine. We just take the Bible as written. We will not go against the Bible and follow man's interjections. It doesn't mean we don't love our fellow man Or respect them. Some people are only following what they have been taught. What mom,dad,grandparents etc. The Bible wasn't written in a way that you have to be a holder of a PhD. It's plainly written for those who attempt to understand it. If you take the KJV and look at it in a simplistic fashion ,then yes,you can make a good argument that it says baptism is necessary. If however you actually understand salvation,grace,and faith from a biblical view,and you understand that the KJV is only a translation flawed at many times,you can understand that when the scriptures say baptism they aren't always talking about what you think baptism is. Baptism doesn't always mean water baptism,most of the time it does not. If you also spend decades studying original languages,you will have a better understanding and come to the conclusion that water baptism is only a symbol of the true baptism into the body of Christ. If however your denomination holds to the simplistic view,and will not look at any other,you will never dig deep enough to learn anything else because you would be going against your denomination. When all is said and done it is my opinion that for many such as these their denomination is more important than the truth,and has become the only truth they will see.
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: Irishguy]
#2173252
07/22/17 09:14 AM
07/22/17 09:14 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,753 Moody, AL
willdo22
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,753
Moody, AL
|
We go to Church of the Highlands. That probably indicates where I stand on the subject. Regardless of the music, our church is the most spiritual, loving, welcoming, giving and God centered that I have ever been associated with. I have never known a Church that does more for God than this church does. Psalms 96:1 Says... "O sing unto the LORD a new song: sing unto the LORD, all the earth." He doesn't say keep singing the old ones forever... I go to the same church now after spending the first 26 years of my life in the same one. I like the vast majority of songs that are sung/played there, but the ones I'm on the fence about have more to do with flow/wording that the instruments. I think that people have different tastes, and that is A-OK, but churches need to modernize without getting outside the Bible.
A mans got to know his limitations.
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: R_H_Clark]
#2173255
07/22/17 09:18 AM
07/22/17 09:18 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111 The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
300gr
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111
The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
|
I have a question for the church of Christ folks..
Why is it so important to you to defend the belief that baptism is a necessary step in salvation? I don't know of a Protestant Christian denomination that doesn't baptize believers so by default we are saved even if we believe we were saved before we were baptized.
Is Church of Christ the only denomination You might as well give up. They will never go against their church doctrine and tradition.To do so they would have to give up their part in salvation. No church doctrine. We just take the Bible as written. We will not go against the Bible and follow man's interjections. It doesn't mean we don't love our fellow man Or respect them. Some people are only following what they have been taught. What mom,dad,grandparents etc. The Bible wasn't written in a way that you have to be a holder of a PhD. It's plainly written for those who attempt to understand it. If you take the KJV and look at it in a simplistic fashion ,then yes,you can make a good argument that it says baptism is necessary. If however you actually understand salvation,grace,and faith from a biblical view,and you understand that the KJV is only a translation flawed at many times,you can understand that when the scriptures say baptism they aren't always talking about what you think baptism is. Baptism doesn't always mean water baptism,most of the time it does not. If you also spend decades studying original languages,you will have a better understanding and come to the conclusion that water baptism is only a symbol of the true baptism into the body of Christ. If however your denomination holds to the simplistic view,and will not look at any other,you will never dig deep enough to learn anything else because you would be going against your denomination. When all is said and done it is my opinion that for many such as these their denomination is more important than the truth,and has become the only truth they will see. The same could be said of your view as well. Can't believe the Bible as written? It was translated by people into English that were far above any of today's language pros.its obvious you won't change and neither will I. It's not "denomination" following as you suggest but Bible following. I grew up Baptist and know all what's taught. Some is biblical,some is not. Nobody's perfect! But on the issue of what's required to be saved the Bible is the only authority. To me the other bickering is not important if in one is saved the scriptural way.Gods way! I follow no man made Creed's,doctrines etc. I follow God's word. I have to live with my decisions just like every one else does. I'm not trying to push my beliefs on anyone but explain why I believe what's written. If I'm correct in the scriptural instructions for being Saved( which I'm confident baptism is the final step to contact the saving blood) then my bases are all covered. To all the others ideas of being Saved without baptism if on judgement day it's revealed you were wrong then it's too late.
Last edited by 300gr; 07/22/17 09:50 AM.
Two roads diverged in the woods and I took the one with deep ruts,hills and mud.It may be bumpy but WHAT A RIDE!
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: snakebit]
#2173258
07/22/17 09:23 AM
07/22/17 09:23 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111 The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
300gr
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111
The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
|
Back to the original posters question I like the older songs and newer ones. I doubt any of the songs sung today are anything like the ones in the apostles time as far as content and delivery
Two roads diverged in the woods and I took the one with deep ruts,hills and mud.It may be bumpy but WHAT A RIDE!
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: 300gr]
#2173260
07/22/17 09:26 AM
07/22/17 09:26 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
I have a question for the church of Christ folks..
Why is it so important to you to defend the belief that baptism is a necessary step in salvation? I don't know of a Protestant Christian denomination that doesn't baptize believers so by default we are saved even if we believe we were saved before we were baptized.
Is Church of Christ the only denomination You might as well give up. They will never go against their church doctrine and tradition.To do so they would have to give up their part in salvation. No church doctrine. We just take the Bible as written. We will not go against the Bible and follow man's interjections. It doesn't mean we don't love our fellow man Or respect them. Some people are only following what they have been taught. What mom,dad,grandparents etc. The Bible wasn't written in a way that you have to be a holder of a PhD. It's plainly written for those who attempt to understand it. If you take the KJV and look at it in a simplistic fashion ,then yes,you can make a good argument that it says baptism is necessary. If however you actually understand salvation,grace,and faith from a biblical view,and you understand that the KJV is only a translation flawed at many times,you can understand that when the scriptures say baptism they aren't always talking about what you think baptism is. Baptism doesn't always mean water baptism,most of the time it does not. If you also spend decades studying original languages,you will have a better understanding and come to the conclusion that water baptism is only a symbol of the true baptism into the body of Christ. If however your denomination holds to the simplistic view,and will not look at any other,you will never dig deep enough to learn anything else because you would be going against your denomination. When all is said and done it is my opinion that for many such as these their denomination is more important than the truth,and has become the only truth they will see. The same could be said of your view as well. Can't believe the Bible as written? It was translated by people into English that were far above any of today's language pros.its obvious you won't change and neither will I. It's not "denomination" following as you suggest but Bible following. I grew up Baptist and know all what's taught. Some is biblical,some is not. Nobody's perfect! But on the issue of what's required to be saved the Bible is the only authority. To me the other bickering is not important if in one is saved the scriptural way.Gods way! I follow no man made Creed's,doctrines etc. I follow God's word. I have to live with my decisions just like every one else does. I'm not trying to push my beliefs on anyone but explain why I believe what's written Then there's no reason to say anything else about it is there? If you wanted to change your mind there's enough information available that will correctly explain the scriptures for you to do so. I've looked into it for years and concluded differently than you. If you have looked for yourself and concluded differently than me,that's fine,but I would at least want anyone to do that,rather than just following church doctrine.
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: snakebit]
#2173268
07/22/17 09:35 AM
07/22/17 09:35 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111 The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
300gr
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111
The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
|
Yep no reason for either of to say anything else. I have self control do you? You always seem to want the last word in any biblical discussion. I've studied the scripture as well. I'm 51 years old and have studied for a long long time. As stated I follow no denominational rules just the Bible. I do agree that all people should not get stuck on blindly following any "church" if it's not tested and proven by scripture.Ok I'm through with this discussion if you are. Let's get back to deer!
Last edited by 300gr; 07/22/17 09:38 AM.
Two roads diverged in the woods and I took the one with deep ruts,hills and mud.It may be bumpy but WHAT A RIDE!
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: 300gr]
#2173278
07/22/17 09:51 AM
07/22/17 09:51 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
Yep no reason for either of to say anything else. I have self control do you? You always seem to want the last word in any biblical discussion. I've studied the scripture as well. I'm 51 years old and have studied for a long long time. As stated I follow no denominational rules just the Bible. I do agree that all people should not get stuck on blindly following any "church" if it's not tested and proven by scripture.Ok I'm through with this discussion if you are. Let's get back to deer! You got any tied out this year? I ain't no spring chicken either,49,which is why I'm so stubborn.
Last edited by R_H_Clark; 07/22/17 09:54 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Contemporary vs. Traditional
[Re: R_H_Clark]
#2173280
07/22/17 10:00 AM
07/22/17 10:00 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111 The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
300gr
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,111
The Boonies a.k.a. Pickens cou...
|
Haha us old folks do be stubborn. Nothing wrong with that. I've seen a few Doe's running around but nothing impressive on racks. Last year was the worst ever for not seeing deer. Probably drought related. I'm hoping this year will be better cause I like to eat deer as well as hunt. If we see more activity this year and you need some meat let me know. I'll put you in a shooting house overlooking a field. Bout a 200 yd shot to the field.
Last edited by 300gr; 07/22/17 10:01 AM.
|
|
|
|