What I would suggest is to objectively consider why most of us are telling you you're wrong. Use some analytical thinking and breakdown your logic. Then see if you can understand logically the decision making process and possible outcomes. Write is down on a piece of paper and make a flow chart if you know how. Start with your vote for either 3 candidates and then draw out all the possible outcomes from those three votes.

The only way your logic works is if the desired outcome it to make a personal statement about your dislike of either choice. Beyond that there is no impact. We both know it stops there because we both know whoever you write in WILL NOT WIN.

Thus, you are willing to accept the inevitable. And that is that someone else will make the decisions and you will live by their rules.

My problem is y'all will likely be the first to complain. Yet if you circle back to the logic in your decision you and I both know you had no impact on the ultimate outcome.

But you are still going to complain when Heath Care costs are more than you can afford.

You say I'm "for" Ron Bishop. And I say you are also "for" someone else deciding how much you will pay in taxes, how much your will pay in healthcare costs... the list of things that will directly impact your life and wallet is more than anyone could write down.