Nope. The ignorant thing is to think that there is a third possibility. What I hate is that most write in voters agree with republican principals much more than democrat principals but they somehow can't see that by writing in a third party they actually helped to advance the principals they want to stand against. It's like cutting off your nose just to spite your face.
There are actually a myriad of candidates and parties to chose from. To limit yourself to only two "because they can win" is the dumbest %^$& I've ever heard.
Are there only two trucks to choose from? Are there only two colleges to go to? Are there only two religions to choose from?
The answer is no, of course. Why is that? Because believe it or not, there are people in the world that value things that might be different from what you value. Just because there is some overlap in those values, doesn't mean I should pick the one that LEAST represents my interests/beliefs just because they might have the best chance to win.
My core principals are: limited gov't, individual liberties, and fiscal conservatism. I challenge you to name me the last Republican or Democrat that followed any of those ideals.
Roy Moore is an authoritarian religious zealot. He reflects almost NONE of my personal beliefs and think he's a total clown. Doug Jones and I would agree on VERY little on politics. However, I've met Doug Jones numerous times and know that he isn't a clown like Moore. Again, you want me to vote Republican, they need to stop nominating CLOWNS.
