|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 registered members (beetrapper, Nowlide, Fl Panhandler, BhamFred, Backwards cowboy, Double Down, DThrash, Mbrock, rickyh_2, square, Bushmaster, Jweeks, wk2hnt, brushwhacker, Jdkprp70, trlrdrdave, bhammedic84, JAT, BOFF, CrappieMan, Bowfish, eclipse829, Young20, Paint Rock 00, walt4dun, gwstang, slippinlipjr, Dean, courseup, goodman_hunter, Ridge Life, GATA87, mw2015, CarbonClimber1, HoofNSpur, lectrode, WINMAG300, Reptar, Lonster, Morris, sj22, Geeb, turkey247, Bustinbeards, Atoler, Skullworks, Sandmtnslayer, Wool, outdoorguy88, canvasback, dustymac, 25-20, AUjerbear, MS_Hunter, Davyalabama, fur_n_feathers, timberwolfe, need2hunt, JHL, canine933, BrandonClark, fingers, Mennen34, brett.smith, roosterbob, desertdog, Mjh97, turkey_killer, alhawk, bamamed1, Frankie, BigA47, scrape, BamaPlowboy, TurkeyJoe, janiemae, Marbury, Fishbones, Bmyers142, JohnG, AU338MAG, Fattyfireplug, knock him down, XVIII, sawdust, Joe4majors, jw706, DoubleB, Dubie, demp17, Jmfire722, billrv, Ryano, BamaGuitarDude, pcola4, SuperSpike, cullbuck, smallgame, Okatuppa, btfl, m2ruger, mcninja, COOTER, G/H, 7mmSTW, cartervj, Diesel, Teacher One, juice, 2 ducks, 300gr, RSmith, centralala, furnfeather, geeb1, 13 invisible),
680
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Game check stats to date
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#2346087
12/27/17 09:07 AM
12/27/17 09:07 AM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 157 AL, Chambers
kanebreak
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 157
AL, Chambers
|
I’m still amazed at how many folks bitch about game check.
I'm still amazed at how many folks are ignoring GC. I thought we would get 30-40% compliance the first year, and be running at least 50% by now. It's obviously not happening. I'm not sure what they can do to make it work. Usually, when people won't comply with a government edict, the government tries some form of punishment. I would assume that will be the thing they try next, but it's just a guess. What criteria did you use to make the statement "It's obviously not happening." ? The following are not my words, but sum it up pretty nicely I think. "“Obviously” is a purely destructive word. It’s commonly used when a new concept or idea is being built of pre-existing notions.
Last edited by kanebreak; 12/27/17 09:11 AM.
|
|
|
|