|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
87 registered members (Kdog, SouthBamaSlayer, jlbuc10, BrentsFX4, Mack1, mw2015, MR3391, SC53, ALDawg, South Ala Hunter, Chad Burnette, Marbury, CatHeadBiscuit, odocoileus, Ben Ward, auman, Ruger7mag, hamma, TDog93, outdoorguy88, ImThere, oakachoy, cchoque93, Turkey, Narrow Gap, courseup, BigEd, Jmfire722, 000buck, Chancetribe, Big Buck Video, Ray_Coon, Alb, ShootemupTex, Beak_Buster, Hunting-231, BCLC, Johnal3, Parker243, 25-20, geeb1, rrice0725, jmj120, jdstephen44, Irishguy, slick_trick, BC_Reb, Hornhntr, CHParker, TurkeyJoe, rickyh_2, knock him down, specialk, GATA87, Whiskey9, canichols424, BentBarrel, Otiscat13, Showout, Broadhead26, AUdeerhunter, Bushmaster, Backwards cowboy, WMEC615, twaldrop4, Gobble4me757, AU338MAG, mdavis, scrubbuck, 1hunter, Sixpointholler, AJones, Aldecks1, RockFarmer, YellaLineHunter, Floorman1, Bake, 10 invisible),
770
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: Clem]
#2710460
01/18/19 04:24 PM
01/18/19 04:24 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 91 Birmingham, AL
IsaacMcCaslin
spike
|
spike
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 91
Birmingham, AL
|
If you listen closely to Steve Rinella, he's not very conservative, or, as far as I can tell openly Christian (He talks about Gods, and cosmos, and the afterlife, but never any specifics). I still like the guy.
Is it wrong to listen to folks with view points that differ from our own? Last time I checked this was called being well-rounded and open-minded. I frequently listen to people with which I strongly disagree.
No kidding. Good luck avoiding everything that isn't in some way owned by a liberal.
Thus the question for many with situations like this about Rinella, just for one example. Some will say it's one of those "hold your nose" things and others will say "Nope, no way, screw them forever." I enjoy the Rolling Stones. Love listening to Foo Fighters. Green Day's "American Idiot" is pretty stout. Merle Haggard, super. They're all liberals. Probably are anti-gun. Do you stop listening-reading-watching everything or pick the battles you can fight best in? Maybe I'm a simple man, but I typically just enjoy things for what they are. If Rinella wrote a book about the benefits of cultural Marxism, I'd probably skip it. But, I wouldn't go and burn my copy of The Scavenger's Guide to Haute Cuisine.
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: Clem]
#2710470
01/18/19 04:38 PM
01/18/19 04:38 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 25,318 Buc-ee’s Beach Express
leroycnbucks
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 25,318
Buc-ee’s Beach Express
|
Remember Irish thread on this organization. Heck I said that I was going to join. No way after the links Clem posted and reading this article.
His detractors, however, may have had a point, given O’Brien’s close connections to long-time Tester political operatives. That’s because O’Brien also serves on the board of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers (BHA), a non-profit run by Land Tawney, a Montana Democratic operative and former Obama presidential campaign surrogate. In 2012, Tawney ran the Montana Hunters and Anglers PAC, which spent seven figures to defeat Tester’s Republican challenger at the time.
Proud Army and ALNG veteran God Bless America!
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: soalaturkeys]
#2710493
01/18/19 05:05 PM
01/18/19 05:05 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,877 in the corner
Stob
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,877
in the corner
|
I support Rinella but I will not support a left leaning, anti 2A organization. Can you support and enjoy Rinella's show knowing full well one of his biggest liberal investors-owners wants to harm your 2A rights and has decried "trophy" hunting? No! I have spoken highly of Rinella and his show to people one-on-one and on this forum. I really like his work, very very much. His has peed in his own chili as far as I am concerned. Screw. Him. Y'all can soft pedal all this all you want and talk about public lands, what you THINK Rinella thinks, blah blah blah but I say if a guy owns the franchise who has said some of the chit he has said....Screw. Him. Makes me livid. What I'm saying is, Rinella has done some good work for hunting, good entertainment, shows, podcasts and he's a heck of a hunter. HOWEVER, I will not continue to follow the show, or his work from here on out, And yes, he has PEED IN HIS CHILI. But he'll prolly take his money (prolly a few mill) and move on to something else. But I wont be watching.
Last edited by Stob; 01/18/19 05:08 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: IsaacMcCaslin]
#2710494
01/18/19 05:05 PM
01/18/19 05:05 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,546 Mobile, AL
soalaturkeys
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,546
Mobile, AL
|
[/quote] Maybe I'm a simple man, but I typically just enjoy things for what they are. If Rinella wrote a book about the benefits of cultural Marxism, I'd probably skip it. But, I wouldn't go and burn my copy of The Scavenger's Guide to Haute Cuisine. [/quote] I doubt I will burn that book, either. We have had LOTS and LOTS of conversations here about boycotts and their relative worth or lack of it. I am of an age where it no longer worries me to say I will NEVER, EVER, buy a single item from Dick's or F&S unless they change their 2A policy. I will NEVER watch another movie with George Clooney after what he said about Charlton Heston. I do not go to Starbuck's, and will not, unless I am forced to by a customer, and even then I will try my best to steer them away. I used to drive through the joint every single workday. Like clockwork, they knew me by name. If I have to cut out a whole bunch of social things to protest the decline of our culture, I will do so, and you can say it's to cut off my nose to spite my face, that's fine. But we need to take a stand. I took the morning off and went to the March for Life here locally. It was uplifting to see so many young people. Yes, they got out of Parochial and Christian schools to attend, but they listened, they applauded, they cheered. They chanted Hey hey, ho ho, Roe v. Wade has GOT TO GO as we marched though downtown. ! I boycott companies who fund Planned Parenthood. I'm ornery. And old. So sue me!! 
"For the Truth the Turkey is in Comparison a much more respectable Bird, and withal a true original Native of America" ~Benjamin Franklin
Isaiah 40:13-14
RAP is CRAP
NRA Life Member, GOA, BamaCarry Member
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: BatesConst]
#2710635
01/18/19 07:49 PM
01/18/19 07:49 PM
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 6,363 On the X
TickaTicka
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 6,363
On the X
|
He's the best voice for hunting we have. Period.
I know a lot of people who have never hunted, never owned a firearm and yet always can't wait to talk to me about his shows or podcasts.
Are y'all dropping a lot of cash on the Meat eater brand? His podcast is free, his show is now on Netflix. So he's gonna miss a few downloads and how many of you are calling to cancel your Netflix subscription over this?
Do you think he's now going to be spouting anti gun rhetoric now? While shooting game with a rifle or shotgun or bow? Think about that for a minute.
I read this investor's group is gonna infuse 8 figures into the Meat eater umbrella. That's right, >10 million. A few downloads of podcasts or views on Netflix being dropped ain't gonna touch this. Good for him. It's the American dream.
Public Land Owner
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: Abbhudson]
#2711017
01/19/19 10:09 AM
01/19/19 10:09 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 25,318 Buc-ee’s Beach Express
leroycnbucks
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 25,318
Buc-ee’s Beach Express
|
Rinella is obviously not anti gun or anti hunting. Anyone who thinks that is an idiot.
He took a bunch of money from an anti guy to infuse into his brand which is very pro hunting and pro 2A.
Seems like we should be congratulating him on taking a bunch of money from a gun grabber and using it to advance a pro hunting and pro gun ideology. I agree. But what bothers me is are the wealthy anti gunners and hunters buying shares in ownership into brands like the Meateater to completely destroy them. Sounds like a stupid business adventure but their hate for what we love I wouldn’t put it past them. So if I was Renella I would want to be in business with like minded people. Just a thought.
Proud Army and ALNG veteran God Bless America!
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: leroycnbucks]
#2711020
01/19/19 10:14 AM
01/19/19 10:14 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,126 KY
AUstan23
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,126
KY
|
Rinella is obviously not anti gun or anti hunting. Anyone who thinks that is an idiot.
He took a bunch of money from an anti guy to infuse into his brand which is very pro hunting and pro 2A.
Seems like we should be congratulating him on taking a bunch of money from a gun grabber and using it to advance a pro hunting and pro gun ideology. I agree. But what bothers me is are the wealthy anti gunners and hunters buying shares in ownership into brands like the Meateater to completely destroy them. Sounds like a stupid business adventure but their hate for what we love I wouldn’t put it past them. So if I was Renella I would want to be in business with like minded people. Just a thought. I think Hudson completely missed the point of the rich anti-gun guy buying primary ownership of a pro-gun platform. This isn't just about making money. Its about who's calling the shots at the head of the table. I think it'll be funny when all the companies and platforms are completely bought up and next thing you know there won't be a pro-gun anything in sight because none of the owners will allow that sentiment to reach a broad public audience,
It is easier to fool a man than to convince him he has been fooled.
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: leroycnbucks]
#2711021
01/19/19 10:15 AM
01/19/19 10:15 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 23,108 Lickskillet, AL
Irishguy
a.k.a. Dingle Johnson
|
a.k.a. Dingle Johnson
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 23,108
Lickskillet, AL
|
Rinella is obviously not anti gun or anti hunting. Anyone who thinks that is an idiot.
He took a bunch of money from an anti guy to infuse into his brand which is very pro hunting and pro 2A.
Seems like we should be congratulating him on taking a bunch of money from a gun grabber and using it to advance a pro hunting and pro gun ideology. I agree. But what bothers me is are the wealthy anti gunners and hunters buying shares in ownership into brands like the Meateater to completely destroy them. Sounds like a stupid business adventure but their hate for what we love I wouldn’t put it past them. So if I was Renella I would want to be in business with like minded people. Just a thought. I agree with both of you. Money is money... But if Hillary Clinton came up to me and told me she was going to give me a million bucks to start a online hunting and shooting forum, I think I would surely be questioning her motives.
|
|
|
Re: Rinella
[Re: AUstan23]
#2711023
01/19/19 10:15 AM
01/19/19 10:15 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,126 KY
AUstan23
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,126
KY
|
Rinella is obviously not anti gun or anti hunting. Anyone who thinks that is an idiot.
He took a bunch of money from an anti guy to infuse into his brand which is very pro hunting and pro 2A.
Seems like we should be congratulating him on taking a bunch of money from a gun grabber and using it to advance a pro hunting and pro gun ideology. I agree. But what bothers me is are the wealthy anti gunners and hunters buying shares in ownership into brands like the Meateater to completely destroy them. Sounds like a stupid business adventure but their hate for what we love I wouldn’t put it past them. So if I was Renella I would want to be in business with like minded people. Just a thought. I think Hudson completely missed the point of the rich anti-gun guy buying primary ownership of a pro-gun platform. This isn't just about making money. Its about who's calling the shots at the head of the table. I think it'll be funny when all the companies and platforms are completely bought up and next thing you know there won't be a pro-gun anything in sight because none of the owners will allow that sentiment to reach a broad public audience, *and the indoctrinated following generations will fall in line accordingly as boomers and then gen xers die off.
Last edited by AUstan23; 01/19/19 10:16 AM.
It is easier to fool a man than to convince him he has been fooled.
|
|
|
|