|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
91 registered members (Narrow Gap, IMISSALDEER, Herdbull, BCLC, 3006bullet, Selbbub, Mdees, CNC, dave260rem!, BigEd, Ben2, Jay512, 3Gs, eclipse829, Treelimb, chuck216, Solothurn, HHSyelper, GobbleGrunt, taggedout, Showout, thayerp81, CatHeadBiscuit, hue, Backwater, Bmyers142, Ron A., RareBreed, Cousneddy, HBWALKER14, GomerPyle, MAG, Floorman1, Turkey, Mansfield, Chaser357, Dubie, scrape, abamadude, Bronco 74, BPI, Bustinbeards, UA Hunter, Bandit635, bama_tacoma, NVM1031, Gobble4me757, cullbuck, Tree Dweller, Sixpointholler, sj22, jdhunter2011, NoHuntin, RebFormanUDA, hallb, Fullthrottle, auwild, mathews prostaff, foldemup, 7PTSPREAD, RSmith, TexasHuntress, dwaugh, Bowfish, jmj120, Reptar, cchoque93, MTeague, Ryano, effinacotton, stl32, CeeHawk37, twaldrop4, bamacamp, beRAD, gastoka, slim68, buck_buster, Dixiepatriot, rblaker, Dean, BREEZE1, Otiscat13, BrentsFX4, Diesel, Cjunkin, 5 invisible),
742
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: Southwood7]
#2766015
03/19/19 03:32 PM
03/19/19 03:32 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17,268 Montgomery
bamaeyedoc
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17,268
Montgomery
|
Pcp. The numbers listed are not how many turkeys the guys who killed 5 took. It’s how many hunters killed 5,4,3, etc. so 178 hunters actually took 890 birds. That's what I was trying to figure out. In 2017 it breaks down like this: 3184 total birds were killed by hunters who reported killing just 1 bird 2196 total birds were killed by hunters who reported killing 2 birds (2x1098 hunters) 1365 ----------------------------------------------------------------------3 birds (3x455 hunters) 888------------------------------------------------------------------------4 birds (4x222 hunters) 615------------------------------------------------------------------------5 birds (5x123 hunters) 8248 total birds reported in 2017 They say 8266 total harvest without IRV (whatever that is) so I'm not sure why the numbers don't add up. So does this mean that if the limit had been 3 birds in 2017, would there have been 1503 (888+615) extra gobblers in 2018? Dr. B
Last edited by bamaeyedoc; 03/19/19 03:33 PM.
AKA: “Dr. B” Aldeer #121 8-3-2000 Proud alum of AUM, UAB, and UA 2023-2024 ALdeer Deer Contest Winners 2024-2025 Aldeer Deer Contest Winners
Glennis Jerome "Jerry" Harris 1938-2017 UGA Class of 1960 BS/MS Forestry LTJG, USNR
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: Atoler]
#2766016
03/19/19 03:33 PM
03/19/19 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,273 Montgomery / Luverne
crenshawco
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,273
Montgomery / Luverne
|
I believe this is correct:
222 took 4 = 888
123 took 5 = 615
Total harvest = 8266
Hunters who took 4 or more birds were 6.78% of the successful hunters who used game check. They accounted for 18% of the total game check harvest. Really birds 1-3 are irrelevant to the discussion though. We are talking about a limit reduction from 5 to 4 or 3.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: crenshawco]
#2766017
03/19/19 03:36 PM
03/19/19 03:36 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,506
Atoler
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,506
|
I believe this is correct:
222 took 4 = 888
123 took 5 = 615
Total harvest = 8266
Hunters who took 4 or more birds were 6.78% of the successful hunters who used game check. They accounted for 18% of the total game check harvest. Really birds 1-3 are irrelevant to the discussion though. We are talking about a limit reduction from 5 to 4 or 3. Sure. So If you drop the limit to 4, you save 123 birds if those hunters who killed 5 do not guide anyone else. If you drop it to 3 you save 468 if those hunters don’t guide anyone else
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: crenshawco]
#2766034
03/19/19 04:00 PM
03/19/19 04:00 PM
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,584 Behind you
Avengedsevenfold
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,584
Behind you
|
In 2017 123 hunters killed 5 turkeys which was 2.42% of the reported harvest. In 2018 178 hunters killed 5 turkeys which was 3.21% of the reported harvest.
I'm not exactly following what he presented. I don't understand how he got from the 5,549 figure to total harvest of 9,570 in 2017, then 5,087 to total harvest of 9,103 in 2018. Either way 178/9,570 = 1.85% in 2017 and 123/9,103 = 1.35% in 2018. That's the actual percentage of total harvest caused by the 5th bird based off of how I am reading those numbers. I always knew that Preacher and the rest of y’all killers on here were 1%ers!
Carrying a gun isn't comfortable; but at times it is comforting
"Cause the cause for the pause you think you see is really concentration on the steel” NonPoint
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: Coosa1]
#2766045
03/19/19 04:20 PM
03/19/19 04:20 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 27,152 Helena
3toe
Talking Turkey
|
Talking Turkey
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 27,152
Helena
|
The people you really have to worry about aren't the ones who report their 5 birds on game check. It's the ones who kill 15-25 birds a season and don't report any of them. And trust me they exist. I have known several people over the years that have done it. Wish I had the property that had those kind of numbers.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: 3toe]
#2766058
03/19/19 04:40 PM
03/19/19 04:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,348 Lamar
Fishduck
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,348
Lamar
|
The people you really have to worry about aren't the ones who report their 5 birds on game check. It's the ones who kill 15-25 birds a season and don't report any of them. And trust me they exist. I have known several people over the years that have done it. Wish I had the property that had those kind of numbers. Those guys have the whole world to hunt. Piddling is their livelihood!
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: Southwood7]
#2766064
03/19/19 04:45 PM
03/19/19 04:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 38,489 N. Bama
257wbymag
Boo Boo Head
|
Boo Boo Head
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 38,489
N. Bama
|
And neglect their jobs and family for 60 days to do it.
Quietly killing turkeys where youre not!!! My tank full of give a fraks been runnin on empty I'm the paterfamilias
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: crenshawco]
#2766076
03/19/19 05:08 PM
03/19/19 05:08 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,966 Coosa County, AL
Coosa1
SOA Professional
|
SOA Professional
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,966
Coosa County, AL
|
Jesus, y'all are making my head hurt If you would go kill a turkey it would make it feel better  You dang right!
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: Atoler]
#2766175
03/19/19 07:11 PM
03/19/19 07:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,517 Sylacauga, AL
poorcountrypreacher
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,517
Sylacauga, AL
|
I believe this is correct:
222 took 4 = 888
123 took 5 = 615
Total harvest = 8266
Hunters who took 4 or more birds were 6.78% of the successful hunters who used game check. They accounted for 18% of the total game check harvest. Really birds 1-3 are irrelevant to the discussion though. We are talking about a limit reduction from 5 to 4 or 3. Sure. So If you drop the limit to 4, you save 123 birds if those hunters who killed 5 do not guide anyone else. If you drop it to 3 you save 468 if those hunters don’t guide anyone else Thanks, 468 is the number I have wanted to know.
All the labor of man is for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not filled.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#2766178
03/19/19 07:15 PM
03/19/19 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,074 Pelham
Ben2
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,074
Pelham
|
I believe this is correct:
222 took 4 = 888
123 took 5 = 615
Total harvest = 8266
Hunters who took 4 or more birds were 6.78% of the successful hunters who used game check. They accounted for 18% of the total game check harvest. Really birds 1-3 are irrelevant to the discussion though. We are talking about a limit reduction from 5 to 4 or 3. Sure. So If you drop the limit to 4, you save 123 birds if those hunters who killed 5 do not guide anyone else. If you drop it to 3 you save 468 if those hunters don’t guide anyone else Thanks, 468 is the number I have wanted to know. What is the % we are assuming are not reporting to game check, you have to add that as well even if we assume they will not follow game laws as they dont report anyway.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: Atoler]
#2766295
03/19/19 08:58 PM
03/19/19 08:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,074 Pelham
Ben2
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,074
Pelham
|
I’m making the assumption that the ratio of 4th/5th birds to total harvest will remain similar to the 5.6% in game check. If chucks 35% participation is correct, that would mean less than 1500 birds saved statewide by dropping the limit to 3. 1500 is a bunch of Turkey gobblers. Wonder how many of those would die of natural causes that year they were not killed? Over a 4 or 5 year period that's a sure enough bunch of turkey gobblers saved
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: Atoler]
#2766325
03/19/19 09:25 PM
03/19/19 09:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,074 Pelham
Ben2
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,074
Pelham
|
1338 birds total to be exact. Of course that’s assuming chucks 35% participation is correct. To break it down further, that would add about 20 longbeards per county. Let’s be optimistic and say 3/4 of them survive and no hunters take others after limiting out. After 3 years you’ve added 45 longbeards per county. That’s about as many as you will ever add because the older ones will die. With this format, perry county would have an additional longbeard per every 16 square miles. My guesstimating may be way off, but even if it improved the gobbler numbers twice what I’m thinking, it won’t make a crap worth of difference.
That's 1338 more than will survive this year so that's a good thing! Once population numbers recover they can always increase the limit
|
|
|
|