|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 registered members (Skillet, Justice, metalmuncher, USeeMSpurs, beano1, BPI, deadeye, UncleHuck, RebFormanUDA, Lil_Fella, Michael256, stl32, Bmyers142, BassCat, Canterberry, 4Him146, AU coonhunter, Mbrock, need2hunt, 163dm, Paint Rock 00, BrandonClark, fillmore, Mulcher, TexasHuntress, donia, lefthorn, GomerPyle, Okatuppa, Dean, Ray_Coon, AU338MAG, foldemup, sj22, 3Gs, cchoque93, Daveleeal, jake5050, specialk, odocoileus, deerchop, XVIII, hallb, jdstephen44, Bushmaster, IMISSALDEER, Hunting-231, jmj120, aubigmac, deadeye48, CatfishJunkie, quailman, desertdog, Shotts, Bread, Dog, kodiak06, mdavis, tmhrmh1, Huntn2feed5, Johnal3, slim68, crenshawco, Mack1, Cahabariverrat, Lockjaw, Bowfish, CKyleC, DGAMBLER, Spotchaser8, CarbonClimber1, JLMiller, Skullworks, rrice0725, Downwind, SharpSpur, kyles, burbank, seminole1, walt4dun, 7 invisible),
484
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Interesting turkey info from Chuck Sykes
[Re: AU_trout_bum]
#2766509
03/20/19 07:38 AM
03/20/19 07:38 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,110
USA
Remington270
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,110
USA
|
I am totally against a reduction in bag limits, until I see more data to support it. However, the idea that just because 3 or 4 gobblers are left to breed 30 or more hens isn't biologically sound from a genetics standpoint. You want genetic diversity in a breeding population and the more that is reduced, the more likely you will see inbreeding and our turkeys will start acting like West Virginians. I don't know what the magic number is for turkeys, but I'd bet the farm it's more than a handful of gobblers to 30 hens. Can't a single bull (cow) service that many female cows? I know you change out the bull eventually, but a 10:1 for turkeys doesn't seem unrealistic.
|
|
|
|
