Zeiss
by OutdoorBug. 02/04/25 09:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
27 registered members (Johnal3, Okatuppa, sw1002, cch, Skinner, BrandonClark, hayman, Birdman83, tucker07, Longtine, MTeague, jmj120, Mulcher, Captain Howdy, odocoileus, burbank, TexasHuntress, dave260rem!, gradythemachine, PikeRoadHunter, Ray_Coon, C3SEAST, DEADorALIVE, 4 invisible),
588
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29088
07/30/09 06:56 AM
07/30/09 06:56 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,251 Madison
BowtechDan
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,251
Madison
|
I've had both. Both are good. It comes down to what you are confident in and getting the right draw length and poundage.
Nathan Carl Goff 19 Sept 2016 - 14 Jan 2017.
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29091
07/30/09 07:18 AM
07/30/09 07:18 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,351 Prattville AL
ElkHunter
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,351
Prattville AL
|
Hoyt is! I can't tell you how many diehard bowhunters have made the switch this year. If you haven't shot the AlphaMax, don't. Because, you will be making the switch as well!
Alabama Hog Control, Inc. www.alabamahogcontrol.comBarry Estes The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29094
07/30/09 08:56 AM
07/30/09 08:56 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,195 Cropwell, AL
slgunnel
6 point
|
6 point
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,195
Cropwell, AL
|
Originally posted by BowtechDan: Both are good. It comes down to what you are confident in and getting the right draw length and poundage. Spot on advice right there. You have to read through a lot of "my bow is better than yours" crap, but the forums at archery talk have a lot of good info. That way you might have a better idea of bows you'd like to try out. Shoot as many as you can at the shops and go with what feels good for you.
KEEP WORKING - Millions on Welfare depend on you...
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29096
07/30/09 10:20 AM
07/30/09 10:20 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,567 colbert county
cartervj
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,567
colbert county
|
I wouldn't pass up an opportunity to shoot an Elite GT500, probably the best shooting bow out there this year. The grip is like a Bowtech, the Matthews grip has a thicker grip and lower wrist angle to it.
Plus it has the famous Barnsdale limbs and custom strings.
“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29097
07/30/09 01:45 PM
07/30/09 01:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,257 alabama
medicfire
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,257
alabama
|
mathews all the way hands down
Some people go to church and think about hunting---others go hunting and think about God
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29098
07/30/09 01:52 PM
07/30/09 01:52 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,856 Huntsville
JUGHEAD
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,856
Huntsville
|
Depends upon which attributes you consider the most important to you. If you spice up one parameter in a bow's design (speed, smoothness of draw, etc.), then something else is gonna be compromised. Both companies make fantastic bows, you just have to shoot them to see which one you prefer the most. My biggest complaint with Mathews bows are the grips. The grip is so critical in making a bow forgiving and eliminating and/or reducing the possiblity of torqueing the riser, which makes all the difference in the world when trying to shoot fixed blade broadheads accurately and consistently. When a bow costs that much money, you shouldn't have to spring for another $75+ for a replacement grip. Hoyt and Bowtec's have much better grips in my opinion.
Regardless of what you choose, stay at a minimum of around 33" of axle to axle length and a minimum of 7" of brace height and you'll be golden with some decent tuning and proper arrow selection.
"The only reason I shoot a 3.5" shell for turkeys is because they don't make a 4" one." - t123winters
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29099
07/30/09 02:52 PM
07/30/09 02:52 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Bowtech... . I shot every one them last year looking for a new bow and was not impressed with them at all, except speed....that's about all they got. They seem to still be tweaking their riser and limb designs, which result in a lot of time in the repair store. I prefer Hoyt, but Mathews are great bows too. Like JH, I do not like the grips on the Mathews bows, but other than that they are fantastic. Hoyt is much more comfortable. They have been in business a lot longer, and construct the toughest bows on the market..period. Until the last few years they never have really been in the running for the fastest/smoothest bow, but they have always produced quality bow designs, and speed isn't everything. You can only get so fast, and you are bowhunting. If you want to shoot 2,000 f/s get a firearm.
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29101
07/30/09 03:26 PM
07/30/09 03:26 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,687 Central Alabama
QDMAV8R
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,687
Central Alabama
|
I'm confident and comfortable with saying that my Mathews Switchback is the best bow I've ever hunted with. However, I own a Bow Tech General too and like it in different ways than my Mathews. The BT is not as quiet, but it does have a solid feel and shoots really smooth. It is not as forgiving as my S-back and a good bit heavier. The new Hoyts are super smooth and fast and I shot one bare bow and admit I was impressed, infact it is the smoothest of all the new bows IMO. I still like that quiet forgiving solo cam for taking to the woods.
"Never met a deer that I didn't like" - QDMAV8R
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29102
07/30/09 03:32 PM
07/30/09 03:32 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,896 Moulton,AL
Snuffy
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,896
Moulton,AL
|
Quote My biggest complaint with Mathews bows are the grips. The grip is so critical in making a bow forgiving and eliminating and/or reducing the possiblity of torqueing the riser, which makes all the difference in the world when trying to shoot fixed blade broadheads accurately and consistently. Quote The grips are the reason I don't like the hoyts. They just don't feel as good as a Mathews to me. I guess thats why they make different kinds of bows.
If you always do what you've always done you always get what you've always got
|
|
|
Re: Mathews vs bow tech
#29106
07/30/09 07:10 PM
07/30/09 07:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,896 Moulton,AL
Snuffy
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,896
Moulton,AL
|
Originally posted by bloodtrail: BTW, the new Mathews are completely different than the old ones, not in a good way. The Reezen and Monster shoot like speed bows, big humps in the draw cycle and a little more effort needed to draw them. I just bought a Reezen and I haven't noticed that at all. I have an Outback and the Reezen draws smoother and takes less effort to draw than my Outback.
If you always do what you've always done you always get what you've always got
|
|
|
|