where on the other hand you can kill a deer with a spear if you have a deer standing at a bait pile.

Your homework assignment for tonight, look up the word "Analogy" and learn how people use them in a debate, Cause that's twice now that one has obviously just whizzed right over your head.

Yeah, you run right out and try that. LOL! Film it for us so we can see how easy that turns out for you.

If we are banning what makes killing deer easy then firearms would have to be the first thing to go. I could easily kill 25 a year with a gun and never lay eyes on a grain of corn. If you kill 25 deer in one season with a spear over any kind of bait I'll kiss your @$$ under the main redlight in your hometown and give you 2 weeks to draw a crowd to watch.

ok... im going to brake this down for everyone to understand... Hunting is like masterbation. If the "man" says hey fella you can only use your right hand. Then all the south paws are going to have a fit. Ya see, some states can use their left hand, and this pleases them. Now you can't sit here and say you dont wanna be pleased, weather its from the right or the left," different stokes for different folks". but the out come is still the same. ONE HAPPY ASS HUNTER!! hahahahahaha

I hope the folks over in the Legislature
take a look at this thread and see what they
are doing to the deer hunting world: causing
a lot of division and conflict.

If they legalize this unethical and unsportsmenlike
method of "hunting" it will get a whole lot worse
and the conflict will not just be internet debate
it will be real life and real personal for tens of
thousands of people.

If they legalize this unethical and unsportsmenlike
method of "hunting

So you don't hunt near green patches, white oak trees, honeysuckle vines, or any form of bait? If so then I admire you for taking on a greater challenge. If you do hunt over any form of bait then you are just another in a long line of hypocrites on the other side of this debate.

by the way, your last post about how if everyone thought like me women still wouldn't be voting is not an analogy

So says Todd1700...

who still hasn't figured out that his opinion is not fact

If everyone thought like you, "never questioning the why of a law" then yes women still would not be able to vote. Get it now? And yes that is an Analogy.

Here, let me help you.

Analogy: Logic . a form of reasoning in which one thing is inferred to be similar to another thing in a certain respect, on the basis of the known similarity between the things in other respects.

Tell me what part of the following isn't a fact.

A corn feeder, if legalized, would be a food source placed in a specific location by humans for the express purpose of drawing a deer into range of a gun or bow so it can be killed.

A green patch, which is already legal, is a food source placed in a specific location by humans for the express purpose of drawing a deer into range of a gun or a bow so it can be killed.

Some of us have the brains to see the absurdity of one being legal while the other is not since they are the "Exact Same Activity".

And not one person on your side of this debate, you included, has "EVER" given one credible, fact based reason that there is any difference between these two things that warrants one being illegal while the other is not.

Now, here is where you delve off into some side issue or diversionary question to mask the fact that you can't actually come up with a reason they are morally or ethically any different either. Don't feel bad though, nobody else on your side can either. Thankfully it looks like even the powers that be in government are finally coming around to the absurdity of the situation.