|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
70 registered members (Hunter454, timberwolfe, BCLC, furnfeather, AU67Skeeter, Crawfish, HSV. HUNTER, CNC, quailman, jdhunter2011, Longtine, jmj120, Pwyse, AWT6, canine933, Paint Rock 00, aubigmac, dave260rem!, BPI, mopar, zgobbler5, Tree Dweller, Ben2, RedneckNinji, Overland, BigEd, BD, AUdeerhunter, USeeMSpurs, jake5050, Ryano, akbejeepin, MS_Hunter, Big AL 76, hunter84, Rainbowstew, Frankie, Calvin, Skinner, AU coonhunter, 3006bullet, clayk, BradB, Morgan, johnv, JSanford1974, Scout308, Huntn2feed5, bamafan1966, GomerPyle, BamaGuitarDude, 3Gs, bamabeagler, odocoileus, StateLine, BamaBoHunter, treemydog, gman, HHSyelper, 11 invisible),
1,000
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: 6mm Creedmoor performance on deer
[Re: BCLC]
#3016589
01/17/20 05:46 PM
01/17/20 05:46 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,162
Jasper
buckhunter2
OP
10 point
|
OP
10 point
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,162
Jasper
|
How are you liking that SWFA 3-9x42? You know how much I like the SS 6x42 but I haven’t tried any of their variable power models. That model really interests me though. It checks a lot of boxes on paper. So far it’s really impressed me. I was concerned with glass quality and reticle usability in low light. Both have proven to be a non-issue. Glass quality is better than I expected and reticle is plenty bold during legal shooting hours. Haven’t done any extensive comparison but the resolution is as good as a swaro Z3 in good light spotting bullet holes at 100 yards. Tracking is dead nuts on.
You're only as good as your worst shot-
|
|
|
|
