Wasn't the delay due to the da recusing himself because he had worked with one of the shooters and also had several interactions with the deceased and alot of his family due to him and his family being criminals?

the reason i herd on the radio was they was now under arrest is because the old man worked for the DA and he recused himself so the 2nd DA they got knew the guy and recused himself so they found a 3rd DA and he took the case and since it the only evidence presented was by the 2 white men vs a dead black boy they were gonna have to put it before a grand jury, well by the time they have got to this point covid hit and there was no grand jury to have, so then the video came out and gave the cops some evidence so they could arrest the shooters, may have been a cover up who knows, but dead people cant speak for themselves so it was whiteys word against his that it was self defense, maybe some these former law enforcement guys could verify that or clear up the way it works, that was from a georgia cop on rick and bubba yesterday morning

I just read today where there video came out of him inside a house, and he was wearing boots jogging and also had a hammer on himself.

Post up a link to read.

Arming yourself to protect you house/family on your property is one thing and I think if he ended up getting shot you would be within the law. Once you arm yourself and go confront him on a public road I don't think you get to claim self defense. That's just my understanding (and I am no legal scholar), I could have that wrong.

Only "Criminal History" found on Arbery. The Brunswick News has reported Arbery was indicted for allegedly bringing a gun to a 2013 high school basketball game when he was 19. Family attorney Lee Merritt has acknowledged Arbery's 2018 arrest on shoplifting charges.

I agree with you that what we know about what might have happened before this killing does not justify what these two men did. However, I don't think you can just blanket say that what happened before does not matter. It's like the videos you see of the father jumping on someone in court that has raped or killed his daughter. You only see the guy attacking someone just sitting there and say well, why would what happened before even matter? Not trying to compare the two just illustrating that context CAN matter. In this particular case, I don't think it does.

Even in that case LEGALLY the father is wrong.

I never believed the jogging scenario being pushed by the media. I think there had to be a reason for the DA not to immediately charge the shooters. They are guilty of a negligent homicide, but this wasn’t a modern day lynching being pushed by the racial hate mongers.

I've read that Arbery lived 40 miles away but can't find anything that confirms that when doing a search. His obit says he lived in Brunswick, so who knows. Still, ALL the FACTS need to come out.

I’ve kept my mouth shut, but I had more faith in law enforcement than what was being pushed by the national media. There is no way they would have not charged if it was as clear cut as being pushed by the racial hate mongers. The shooters are guilty of a crime. They took the law into their on hands and let a situation get out of control, but I’m tired of our legal system and police being under attack.

The whole jogging thing was a lie pushed by local activist and lawyers and repeated by the national media.

It may be negligent homicide, but the argument could be made that the McMichael's had enough probable cause to make a citizens arrest at which point the fleeing Aubrey attacked, punched dude in the face, grabbed the shotgun and attempted to snatch it away, causing the McMichael's to fear for their lives.

don't know what big deal is. A white man shoots a black man. Whow, black people shoot black people everyday in Major cities around the USA

Lots of racists posting in this thread. Maybe I would be safer back in Mexico?

Juan says bueno.

I think the inherent problem is not, necessarily, they are racists. Everyone I've seen post believe that the shooters are guilty, based on the available evidence. The problem many have is that
there are those in the black community and the media who suppress any crime involving black-on-white but magnify any crime involving white-on-black.

I could illustrate the Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome case in, Knoxville, where 5 blacks kidnapped a young white couple. He was raped, had his penis cut off and stuffed in his mouth, shot and burned by the railroad tracks.She was raped by multiple men in every way imaginable, beaten, suffocated and stuffed into a trashcan. The media hardly touched it. Few on here have likely even heard of the case.

According to, The Manhattan Institute, “Blacks, in other words, committed 85 percent of the non-homicide interracial crimes of violence between blacks and whites, even though they are less than 13 percent of the population.” If you listen to the media and leaders in the black community, you would be led to believe it was the other way around.

I like candace owens shes very smart and not fooled by the narrative

Joe4majors, I like that ole gal. She talks with some sense. Thanks for sharing that.