|
|
|
Peanuts
by Shmoe. 11/22/24 01:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
93 registered members (7mmSTW, GrandSlam, BCLC, 25-20, AustinC, Crawfish, Shaneomac2, kaintuck, Auburn_03, Mbrock, Tailwalk7, Bowfish, TGreen, Cactus_buck, Joe4majors, Rainbowstew, Kelly_123, YB21, Fishduck, CAM, BamaFan64, jwalker77, deadeye48, TurkeyJoe, apolloslade, jake44, Ryano, TDog93, GomerPyle, XVIII, BCD, Petey, Jmkiper, geeb1, dave260rem!, IDOT, PineTop, stuball, AWT6, oldforester, fillmore, top cat, Hammertime7v2, mossyback, Floorman1, biglmbass, !shiloh!, AU7MM08, BigA47, mdavis, jb20, trlrdrdave, roll_tide_hunts, cullbuck, Jtb51b, Beer Belly, Young20, Gut Pile 32, BAR II .270, Bustinbeards, brianr, coosabuckhunter, BhamFred, BamaBoHunter, BPI, hhsdc78, Khitzeman, Redryder, MarksOutdoors, Hoof2table, Peach, AUdeerhunter, Sus scrofa Reduction Specialist, Luxfisher, Guru, handihunter, sawdust, DryFire, DEDTRKY, rblaker, akbejeepin, Paint Rock 00, treemydog, BearBranch, 9 invisible),
687
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: Smann]
#3290619
12/11/20 10:55 PM
12/11/20 10:55 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,815 tuscaloosa
kkfish
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,815
tuscaloosa
|
Everyone needs to just simma down now. This Texas case came out of nowhere and everyone got on board and thought it was the easy win. It sucks the SCOTUS turned it down. The thing is, this changes NOTHING that was happening before Texas filed the case with the SCOTUS. We all got excited and thought this was it! There are still many paths to a Trump win and many cases with standing that the SCOTUS should hear that will accomplish the same thing as the Texas case. It’s just more steps now. Keep the faith!!! This it’s just part of the play. They have them just let it play out. Too much smoke and it will lead to the fire.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: kkfish]
#3290629
12/11/20 11:25 PM
12/11/20 11:25 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 177 Hoover, Al
Smann
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 177
Hoover, Al
|
Everyone needs to just simma down now. This Texas case came out of nowhere and everyone got on board and thought it was the easy win. It sucks the SCOTUS turned it down. The thing is, this changes NOTHING that was happening before Texas filed the case with the SCOTUS. We all got excited and thought this was it! There are still many paths to a Trump win and many cases with standing that the SCOTUS should hear that will accomplish the same thing as the Texas case. It’s just more steps now. Keep the faith!!! This it’s just part of the play. They have them just let it play out. Too much smoke and it will lead to the fire. Lots of smoke. It’s just a slow process. I’m tired of looking 24/7 for updates.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: boker]
#3290635
12/11/20 11:38 PM
12/11/20 11:38 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,686 Satsuma
kodiak06
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,686
Satsuma
|
I just deleted my Facebook account and all you tube apps. I’m thinking now of what goes next. Out of curiosity, why? Not sure why he did but I’d think that it’s a good move. As Americans we going to have to get it in our head and backbone to take a stand, one of which is to stop supporting those that are trying to destroy us. Imo Facebook is leading the pack. That’s one way to look at it but I’m not deleting mine. As an American I like to see what the other side says and has planned. Every protest held in our coastal town has been met with resistance because the dumbasses post date and times on social media. When things don’t go their way they post new meeting places lol. The red white and blue just follow lol. So either way is the right way I guess
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: fireman176]
#3290674
12/12/20 05:41 AM
12/12/20 05:41 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 11,234 northport
deadeye48
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 11,234
northport
|
I said a few days ago I would not depend on the SCOTUS for this victory I said I’d be watching the electoral committees Never had faith or confidence in SCOTUS because Kavenaugh is a turncoat...he hasn’t made a conservative decision yet...I suspected he would be the NOW swing vote Watch the electoral guys !!!
When I need expert advice I tend to talk to myself The older I get the better I used to be
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: bhammedic84]
#3290695
12/12/20 06:40 AM
12/12/20 06:40 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010 NW Florida
fireman176
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010
NW Florida
|
Truckers are shutting down Atlanta and other major cities starting tomorrow and demanding the justice for stolen elections. Its fixing to get ugly without any food deliveries and no toilet paper again. got al link to this info???? It was talked about on twitter, with links from the truckers themselves.
Is it Hunting Season Yet?
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: fireman176]
#3290697
12/12/20 06:44 AM
12/12/20 06:44 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010 NW Florida
fireman176
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010
NW Florida
|
Someone needs to get to those who run these social media left wing sites. They are guilty of interfering in our election, simply by suppressing the ugly truth about their side.
Is it Hunting Season Yet?
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: kodiak06]
#3290707
12/12/20 07:07 AM
12/12/20 07:07 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,801 Clanton
Turkey_neck
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,801
Clanton
|
I just deleted my Facebook account and all you tube apps. I’m thinking now of what goes next. Out of curiosity, why? Not sure why he did but I’d think that it’s a good move. As Americans we going to have to get it in our head and backbone to take a stand, one of which is to stop supporting those that are trying to destroy us. Imo Facebook is leading the pack. That’s one way to look at it but I’m not deleting mine. As an American I like to see what the other side says and has planned. Every protest held in our coastal town has been met with resistance because the dumbasses post date and times on social media. When things don’t go their way they post new meeting places lol. The red white and blue just follow lol. So either way is the right way I guess I’m tired of the liberal bs the more I see the madder I get. Plus I’m not going to darken as many doors as possible that are willfully trying to destroy this country.
Would walk over a naked woman to get to a gobblin turkey!
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: OlTimer]
#3290712
12/12/20 07:19 AM
12/12/20 07:19 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 11,234 northport
deadeye48
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 11,234
northport
|
The SCOTUS vote was 7 to 2 on the rejection of the Texas case. The only 2 that voted in favor were Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. Maybe the curse of the year 2020 will be over January 1, 2021. Keep praying for God's will to be done and have that "mustard seed" of faith! Never, ever, put your faith in people!!! Radio news said 5-4 vote
When I need expert advice I tend to talk to myself The older I get the better I used to be
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: fireman176]
#3290714
12/12/20 07:22 AM
12/12/20 07:22 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 25,117 Buc-ee’s Beach Express
leroycnbucks
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 25,117
Buc-ee’s Beach Express
|
I know it’s practically impossible to not do business or support a company or product that supports the left. Like this Apple phone I’m typing on. But Mark Zuckerberg donated 400 million dollars to the democrats. Nike and PepsiCo donations where 90 % to democrats over republicans.
Proud Army and ALNG veteran God Bless America!
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: fireman176]
#3290733
12/12/20 07:33 AM
12/12/20 07:33 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,488 Scottsboro, Al
jbatey1
Lucky Bastage
|
Lucky Bastage
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,488
Scottsboro, Al
|
Wisconsin Supreme Court has decided to take on Trumps legal teams case regarding the hundreds of thousands of Ballots that were cast illegally. This is after lower courts were less than enthused to do their jobs. Unusual to typical hearings, this is going to happen today. For what it’s worth, Conservatives hold the court 4-3.
The fool tells me his reasons; the wise man persuades me with my own.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: leroycnbucks]
#3290734
12/12/20 07:33 AM
12/12/20 07:33 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,433 Montgomery, Alabama
jaredhunts
Puts sugar in his cornbread!
|
Puts sugar in his cornbread!
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,433
Montgomery, Alabama
|
I know it’s practically impossible to not do business or support a company or product that supports the left. Like this Apple phone I’m typing on. But Mark Zuckerberg donated 400 million dollars to the democrats. Nike and PepsiCo donations where 90 % to democrats over republicans. Yep.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: deadeye48]
#3290739
12/12/20 07:42 AM
12/12/20 07:42 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,909 Alabama
OlTimer
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,909
Alabama
|
The SCOTUS vote was 7 to 2 on the rejection of the Texas case. The only 2 that voted in favor were Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. Maybe the curse of the year 2020 will be over January 1, 2021. Keep praying for God's will to be done and have that "mustard seed" of faith! Never, ever, put your faith in people!!! Radio news said 5-4 vote Every other source has 7 to 2 on the vote.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: leroycnbucks]
#3290758
12/12/20 08:00 AM
12/12/20 08:00 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010 NW Florida
fireman176
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010
NW Florida
|
I know it’s practically impossible to not do business or support a company or product that supports the left. Like this Apple phone I’m typing on. But Mark Zuckerberg donated 400 million dollars to the democrats. Nike and PepsiCo donations where 90 % to democrats over republicans. He donated to the states and politicians, with the stipulation they had to use the dominion machines. So I have heard.
Is it Hunting Season Yet?
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: getting old]
#3290794
12/12/20 08:52 AM
12/12/20 08:52 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 16,590 Montgomery
bamaeyedoc
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 16,590
Montgomery
|
Once in a while, the SC just wants it framed a different way. I'm low on hope after this though. This was simple law. You just ruled that states can do anything they want in Elections. Without even allowing a hearing. Who thought they would? 99% chance they were not going to touch it no matter how much merit it had. Dr. B
AKA: “Dr. B” Aldeer #121 8-3-2000 Proud alum of AUM, UAB, and UA Member of Team 10 Point 2023-2024 ALdeer Deer Contest Winners
Glennis Jerome "Jerry" Harris 1938-2017 UGA Class of 1960 BS/MS Forestry LTJG, USNR
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: Beebs]
#3290837
12/12/20 10:07 AM
12/12/20 10:07 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,771 Alabaster, Al
Buck_TrackingAL
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,771
Alabaster, Al
|
SCOTUS did their job and protected federalism and state sovereignty. A state should not be able to change another state's law or interpretation of law. It's that simple. If you think that SCOTUS hearing the case and siding with TX would be a good thing, then you are not a conservative. For if TX got their way and a new precedent was established by the highest court, then next thing you know, CA and other left states would be free to sue red states over things like gun laws and be able to change other states' laws. No thanks! It's comical to see so many arguing for an abolishment of state sovereignty. Wrong
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: Stob]
#3290839
12/12/20 10:10 AM
12/12/20 10:10 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,938 Banana Republic
jb20
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,938
Banana Republic
|
Oh yeah, thats right. States should be able to change their election laws to favor a chosen political party during an election. And do whatever it takes to win, including corrupting the basis of our Democracy with massive voter fraud. My bad Exactly...if they want to change voting laws for state elections so be it but this affects the entire country
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Ben Franklin
|
|
|
|