|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peanuts
by Bull64. 11/22/24 05:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
142 registered members (crocker, Canterberry, beetrapper, dwaugh, straycat, treemydog, Atoler, Oscarflytyer, metalmuncher, GmeHunter, RidgeRanger, specialk, jw706, AU338MAG, Mack1, Tailwalk7, CeeHawk37, coldtrail, Dave_H, TDog93, Bronco 74, Warhead, LDTiger, StateLine, Darrylcom, sj22, MountainTopHunter, fingers, Sixpointholler, YellaLineHunter, AU coonhunter, highliner, twaldrop4, Frogeye, gwstang, Peach, dirtwrk, BigA47, BLP, Shotts, Mulcher, GomerPyle, gog1015, Herdbull, Simpleman, Snuffy, Xbow, BPI, TwoRs, Shotts2000, Bjoff27, hgmike, TEM, BCLC, jake44, Aldecks1, fillmore, MarksOutdoors, Solothurn, Reload410, Jwillbucks, Young20, BCD, jericward, russellb, Joe4majors, BC, fourfive45, ImThere, fur_n_feathers, JDR4Bama, jwalker77, Skillet, hillmp, AccurateNumber9, jarcher38, Gut Pile 32, Hoof2table, Ben2, fish_blackbass, Morris, Gig, cartervj, Coosa1, cullbuck, SouthBamaSlayer, Gobble4me757, AKB, sawdust, k bush, bamamed1, Sqzpla, shootnmiss, IDOT, Bustinbeards, top cat, UA Hunter, Skinner, Paint Rock 00, Jay512, Jmfire722, doc bar, crenshawco, keith5579, Gizmo76, Whitetaillane, Hammertime7v2, Standbanger, Sus scrofa Reduction Specialist, Tupi, Turkey_neck, Engine5, !shiloh!, Raspy, Gunpowder, bamafarmer, swampoak, canvasback, jbatey1, Fattyfireplug, CAL, Scdoghunter667, mossyback, Big Buck Video, foldemup, Keysbowman, CGR, sw1002, jhardy, AU7MM08, auman, KnightRyder, Cahabariverrat, laylandad, 8 invisible),
682
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: OlTimer]
#3290848
12/12/20 10:17 AM
12/12/20 10:17 AM
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Mobile
Beebs
spike
|
spike
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Mobile
|
To me the Supreme Court took the "United" out of "States". Just let every state do as they wish, even when it affects the election that governs ALL states. This is the definition of confederacy by the way.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: Beebs]
#3290850
12/12/20 10:20 AM
12/12/20 10:20 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,938
Banana Republic
jb20
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,938
Banana Republic
|
Tell me more about how you'd like to give other states the right to intervene in our law making process. Your an idiot if u don't think this fraud won't affect the laws we have in place here now
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Ben Franklin
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: fireman176]
#3290858
12/12/20 10:32 AM
12/12/20 10:32 AM
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Mobile
Beebs
spike
|
spike
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Mobile
|
Tell me more about how you'd like to give other states the right to intervene in our law making process. Your an idiot if u don't think this fraud won't affect the laws we have in place here now Fair enough, but SCOTUS was never the way. How can anyone be surprised that a conservative SCOTUS upheld states' rights? This is what constitutes conservatism.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: fireman176]
#3290866
12/12/20 10:38 AM
12/12/20 10:38 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010
NW Florida
fireman176
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,010
NW Florida
|
Somebody smarter than me, read about the 20th amendment and a JCCIC joint congressional committee on inaugural ceremonies. They supposed to hold the key to who is to be called President elect and has so far refused to acknowledge Joe and Kamala.
Is it Hunting Season Yet?
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: Beebs]
#3290928
12/12/20 11:37 AM
12/12/20 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,386
abolt300
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,386
|
Tell me more about how you'd like to give other states the right to intervene in our law making process. Do you even understand what the lawsuit was about? Those states violated their own election laws and state constitutions in order to be able to give Biden the wins. That’s what the lawsuit was about. By violating their own laws, they disenfranchised the other states that followed theirs to the letter of the law.
Last edited by abolt300; 12/12/20 11:38 AM.
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS just rejected Texas case
[Re: fireman176]
#3290960
12/12/20 12:18 PM
12/12/20 12:18 PM
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Mobile
Beebs
spike
|
spike
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Mobile
|
Tell me more about how you'd like to give other states the right to intervene in our law making process. Do you even understand what the lawsuit was about? Those states violated their own election laws and state constitutions in order to be able to give Biden the wins. That’s what the lawsuit was about. By violating their own laws, they disenfranchised the other states that followed theirs to the letter of the law. And yet TX failed to demonstrate injury which is a constitutional requirement under article iii for any federal lawsuit. Furthermore, there is no provision in the constitution for TX to sue another state like PA over PA state law. 0-9 on merit, 2-7 to hear the case but not grant relief. This was never going to fly.
|
|
|
|
