Now I dont know if this is all there is to it but for now the article says its free........


“They have to have permission from the property owners,” Crawford explained. “If they own the property they can get a free permit to hunt nuisance animals. Landowners can work with the Department of Conservation to get that nuisance permit.”



Like I've said in the past though, there are some things that make sense to me to have a fee for if the money is being used wisely......This is one of those places I would have no problem with paying a fee if the money went back into bettering the resources. I know some say its not a good solution but just as an example.....If the money went to pay for a coyote bounty or to somehow help make the fur market more profitable.....I would see that as a double whammy on helping to control yote number.....Those arent the only two options....Its the principle that I'm more focused on......What I'm not in favor of is just being taxed and it going into some kind of "general fund" or whatever it is they call it......I want to see a paper trail that shows you are wisely using the funds your taking in......and it would be even better for all hunters to be able to see where there money is going....dollar for dollar......That would help with a lot of this rebel attitude about any and everything.....Hell, it's like a natural reflex for us rednecks or something