Basically any of the ones he’s been on that discussed conservation. He does his videos the best out of all the YouTube guys, leaves very little in his videos to get a bead on. It’s all the wanna be’s trying to do what he does that wouldn’t even be out there if they didn’t have a YouTube or Instagram account. They are the ones burning places for pocket change or less. Some of the podcast guests and hosts are the worst. Willing to spill their guts and drop names of places for a little name recognition that nobody cares about. I wish one of them had the guts to push back on the b.s. that chamberlain spews, wouldn’t be hard to make a fool out of him.
Dave is the best of the "Youtube Guys" at least the last I watched. He's a straight predator. The problem though is that he gets off at everyone watching his videos and thinking that he's a predator. You can go back and search my posts, I've said it before - I just don't like his face. There's a "I'm the best" attitude. Which is unfortunate. If Dave wasn't so up on himself he would be a helluva turkey hunter to hang out with. But alas, neuroscience teaches us that by the time we are 30, we are who we are. Even before the "Pinhoti Project", Dave was the guy who got off at being a "better turkey hunter" than everyone else. He's not the guy who loves turkeys. He's not the guy who loves turkey hunting or loves turkey conservation. Dave loves the idea of people thinking he's the best. Dave, in his own words, has branded himself as a "Traveling turkey hunter". He refused to not name the spots he visited. After all, how would people know? He will continue to seek fame as he travels from state to state burning one man's honey hole after the other. It's not that hard to do if you are predator with a video camera. The only hard part is choosing to dedicate your life to that purpose. For Dave, I suspect that choice was easy.
As far as Chamberlain, the man is a self-professed fool. The most interesting thing that he has learned in his lifetime of studying turkeys... by his own words....is not a factoid about turkeys. Instead, it was the fact that he was wrong about something. I.E. That his graduate school project was proven wrong by later research.
