I'm just gonna put this here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfArW6zppYw&t=1s

Kinda like Germany/Poland in 1939. This time with the internet.

Here is what we do know:

Putin knows what was on Hunter Biden's Laptop and who "The Big Guy" is. So the question is simple.... 1) Who is benefiting from our relationship with Ukraine on an individual level and 2) Which U.S. based businesses are benefiting from our relationship with Ukraine and who from group #1 is involved in those businesses.

Biden's entire family
Pelosi?
Romney?

Wait... Colonel Vindman? He seemed like such an honest guy.

Why did the Democrats and Rhino's go into full hyper ventilation over Trump's call to Ukraine and what pressure he appeared to attempt to put on Ukraine? He got impeached over a phone call. What was up with all that? Seemed Fishy didn't it.

Why would Putin be so worried? We are effectively involved and messing in the political sphere of what to the United States = Mexico. This would be like Russia putting a communist government in Mexico City.

I am not justifying either side of this as in the Right or in the Wrong. We are however dealing with a bunch of crooks. Don't take anything at face value.

Gel Mann amnesia
Snip:
effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

I love some Paul Joseph Watson. He usually nails it right on the mark.

Yessir, he is one of the few that actually says what others think but are unwilling to say.

All the news media does this. Fox will post a youtube saying something like Jen Psaki blows a gasket at reporter, and when you watch it, nothing going on to report. I mean would you watch if it said "Jen Psaki calmly answers reporters questions" ?

Politics is corrupt to the core. Even down to the local level. Perfect Example => https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZRcIO2cSfY

The long version of the encounter, where the guy is going off on her supervisor is even more telling. This is what journalism should be about, exposing this kind of thing on all levels.

Lots of outright lies on twitter too. Do they tell you which is which?

If you’re on there enough you’ll figure out the trustworthy ones…or at least more trustworthy.