</a JR Holmes Oil Company </a Shark Guard Southeast Woods and Whitetail Mayer Insurance Services LLC
Aldeer Classifieds
Wanted ... used kitchen /bath cabinets
by Rmart30. 02/09/25 09:20 PM
Begara 6.5 CM w/ Leupold 4-12x40
by aucountry. 02/09/25 07:57 PM
WTB GLOSS Leupold Scope
by Wiley Coyote. 02/09/25 06:56 PM
LABRADAR $320 shipped
by Multi-Tool. 02/09/25 05:08 PM
Boots FS
by cgardner. 02/09/25 03:30 PM
Serious Deer Talk
Big Buck Down
by woodduck. 02/09/25 10:50 PM
Trump from a Bill O'Reilly Perspective
by jwalker77. 02/09/25 10:31 PM
Lowlife people
by TDog93. 02/09/25 10:15 PM
Summer plots
by CKyleC. 02/09/25 09:41 PM
LFTT 2/9
by CKyleC. 02/09/25 09:37 PM
February
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28
Land, Leases, Hunting Clubs
Turkey Rights
by The Big Cheese. 02/05/25 11:52 AM
Montgomery, Autauga, Elmore, Lowndes
by Hibby. 02/04/25 01:52 PM
Girdling trees to kill them
by Beer Belly. 02/03/25 11:58 AM
Scottland Ridge Hunting Club
by billrv. 02/03/25 10:36 AM
Hunting Lease Liability Insurance
by mw2015. 02/01/25 10:45 AM
Who's Online Now
36 registered members (ImThere, Uncle10point, Okatuppa, AUtgr, Tigger85, BC_Reb, Woodsy, Captain Howdy, BCLC, Gobble4me757, JSanford1974, Scout308, velvet tines, KPcalls, treemydog, phinfan, twaldrop4, AMB, Longtine, WINMAG300, Tailwalk7, MountainTopHunter, sw1002, UncleHuck, doublefistful, Paxamus, Chad Burnette, janiemae, canichols424, nomercy, Simpleman, turfarmer, sevenup, 3 invisible), 951 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts #3978678
09/14/23 12:03 PM
09/14/23 12:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,144
Alabama
O
oldbowhunter Offline OP
6 point
oldbowhunter  Offline OP
6 point
O
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,144
Alabama
https://www.outdoorlife.com/conservation/noaa-overestimates-recreational-catch-data/


According to the Great Red Snapper Count (https://www.harteresearch.org/snappercount), a 2021 report (https://www.harteresearch.org/sites...pper-Count-Executive-Summary-Aug2021.pdf) put out by
the Harte Research Institute with help from Southern universities, there are 118 million red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico. NOAA had put that number at 36 million.

Last edited by oldbowhunter; 09/14/23 12:04 PM.
Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: oldbowhunter] #3978720
09/14/23 01:13 PM
09/14/23 01:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,852
Lee County
R
RCHRR Offline
14 point
RCHRR  Offline
14 point
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,852
Lee County
Every fisherman that’s ever fished the gulf knows NOAA’s numbers are way off. You can’t get a baited hook to the bottom without hanging into either the elusive ARS or Triggerfish.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: oldbowhunter] #3978774
09/14/23 02:26 PM
09/14/23 02:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,706
A
abolt300 Offline
Booner
abolt300  Offline
Booner
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,706
^^^^I dont believe any of that for a minute. Say it aint so Joe. I was so sure that the FEDs numbers were 100% accurate. This is really a major shock.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: oldbowhunter] #3978791
09/14/23 03:07 PM
09/14/23 03:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 21,134
Northport, AL
GomerPyle Offline
Impatient Stinky Britches Wearin’ Off-Roadin’ Guru
GomerPyle  Offline
Impatient Stinky Britches Wearin’ Off-Roadin’ Guru
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 21,134
Northport, AL

I wish I could remember the source....I don't remember who it was but I remember at the time thinking they were reputable, stating that part of the problem with the snapper counts is that they only performed the counts in areas with a smooth sandy bottom and with snapper being reef fish, they obviously weren't as common in these particular areas as as areas with more structure.


There are 3 certainties in an uncertain world:

1. All Politicians Are Liars
2. All Gun Laws Are an Infringement
3. Taxation Is Theft
Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: oldbowhunter] #3978822
09/14/23 03:59 PM
09/14/23 03:59 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,706
A
abolt300 Offline
Booner
abolt300  Offline
Booner
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,706
I posted something on that exact thing a year or two ago. All fed counts include only natural bottom. Anything artificial, reefs, wrecks, ships, rig caps, oil platforms, coops, basically everything in the gulf that everyone fishes, that holds probably 65-70% of the fish, is 100% excluded from the fed counts.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: GomerPyle] #3978825
09/14/23 04:00 PM
09/14/23 04:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,216
Mobile, AL
M
Mdees Offline
8 point
Mdees  Offline
8 point
M
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,216
Mobile, AL
Originally Posted by GomerPyle

I wish I could remember the source....I don't remember who it was but I remember at the time thinking they were reputable, stating that part of the problem with the snapper counts is that they only performed the counts in areas with a smooth sandy bottom and with snapper being reef fish, they obviously weren't as common in these particular areas as as areas with more structure.

That’s exactly what the feds did on their initial samplings. Randomized dots on the map, fish them. If they just happened to hit near an artificial reef they’d exclude that sample. And still came up with 30 million without accounting for any of the 4,000+(at the time) rigs and who knows how many artificial reefs or the mats that go over the pipelines.
I used to see Bradley Byrne a couple times a year at social affairs and stayed in his ear about it. Made the suggestion that if NOAA didn’t count the red snapper on artificial reefs as part of the gulf population, we should be able to fish those phantom fish without their oversight if we promised not to fish over the barren sand areas.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: abolt300] #3978840
09/14/23 04:29 PM
09/14/23 04:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,144
Alabama
O
oldbowhunter Offline OP
6 point
oldbowhunter  Offline OP
6 point
O
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,144
Alabama
Originally Posted by abolt300
^^^^I dont believe any of that for a minute. Say it aint so Joe. I was so sure that the FEDs numbers were 100% accurate. This is really a major shock.



It actually is. Someone proved they were lying.

I applaud that group. It took a lot of money and a lot of volunteers to make it happen.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: oldbowhunter] #3978851
09/14/23 05:06 PM
09/14/23 05:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,504
Mobile, AL
P
Pwyse Offline
14 point
Pwyse  Offline
14 point
P
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,504
Mobile, AL
I don’t know how many snapper there are in the gulf. All I know is, when I started off shore fishing, there were rigs everywhere and a lot less snapper. In the 90s, we would pull up to a rig, drop down throughout the water column, we might catch a snapper, we might not. Find another rig on the horizon and run to it. We might have to hit 6-7 rigs to get on them and catch a 4 man limit. Which I think the limit used to be 4 but I might be wrong.
Nowadays, if you got a “private” spot, catch a 4 man limit with 6 pogeys at the first spot. If you are hitting public spots, you might have to hit 2-3 to catch a 4 man limit.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: Pwyse] #3978956
09/14/23 08:18 PM
09/14/23 08:18 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,932
Clanton
Turkey_neck Offline
Booner
Turkey_neck  Offline
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,932
Clanton
Originally Posted by Pwyse
I don’t know how many snapper there are in the gulf. All I know is, when I started off shore fishing, there were rigs everywhere and a lot less snapper. In the 90s, we would pull up to a rig, drop down throughout the water column, we might catch a snapper, we might not. Find another rig on the horizon and run to it. We might have to hit 6-7 rigs to get on them and catch a 4 man limit. Which I think the limit used to be 4 but I might be wrong.
Nowadays, if you got a “private” spot, catch a 4 man limit with 6 pogeys at the first spot. If you are hitting public spots, you might have to hit 2-3 to catch a 4 man limit.

You must be young. I’m 41 and my dad would take clients and occasionally me a client and his son and we would load the freaking boat with snapper.


Would walk over a naked woman to get to a gobblin turkey!
Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: oldbowhunter] #3979003
09/14/23 09:27 PM
09/14/23 09:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,013
Pelham
B
Ben2 Offline
Freak of Nature
Ben2  Offline
Freak of Nature
B
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,013
Pelham
Wait til they figure out how many sharks need killed

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: Ben2] #3979047
09/15/23 05:56 AM
09/15/23 05:56 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 14,292
Mobile, AL
S
SouthBamaSlayer Offline
Gary's Fluffer
SouthBamaSlayer  Offline
Gary's Fluffer
S
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 14,292
Mobile, AL
Originally Posted by Ben2
Wait til they figure out how many sharks need killed

They’ll never admit that.

That’s why there’s a long running shark tournament going on down here right now. The number of sharks is unreal.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: Turkey_neck] #3979360
09/15/23 05:01 PM
09/15/23 05:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,504
Mobile, AL
P
Pwyse Offline
14 point
Pwyse  Offline
14 point
P
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,504
Mobile, AL
Originally Posted by Turkey_neck
Originally Posted by Pwyse
I don’t know how many snapper there are in the gulf. All I know is, when I started off shore fishing, there were rigs everywhere and a lot less snapper. In the 90s, we would pull up to a rig, drop down throughout the water column, we might catch a snapper, we might not. Find another rig on the horizon and run to it. We might have to hit 6-7 rigs to get on them and catch a 4 man limit. Which I think the limit used to be 4 but I might be wrong.
Nowadays, if you got a “private” spot, catch a 4 man limit with 6 pogeys at the first spot. If you are hitting public spots, you might have to hit 2-3 to catch a 4 man limit.

You must be young. I’m 41 and my dad would take clients and occasionally me a client and his son and we would load the freaking boat with snapper.


I’m 44 and I’ve snapper fished the gulf since I was 16. Recreationally and commercially . I wouldn’t call a four man limit loading the boat up. Unless y’all were fishing illegally, Then yeah you could if you fished long enough. My point was, there’s WAY more snapper in the gulf now than there was 20 years ago. Used to a 20lb snapper was a real good one. Now you can catch 3-4 20lbers a trip.

Now we loaded the boat up while commercial fishing. Back then, he had a 600lb license and you could fish the first 10 days of each month. We would catch 600lbs, come sell them and then head back out for 600 more. The first one that broke out the electric reel had to wash the boat. Take turns sleeping on the ride.

Re: New study proves NOAA wrong about fish counts [Re: SouthBamaSlayer] #3979534
09/15/23 09:28 PM
09/15/23 09:28 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,853
Sylacauga
CAL Offline
14 point
CAL  Offline
14 point
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,853
Sylacauga
Originally Posted by SouthBamaSlayer
Originally Posted by Ben2
Wait til they figure out how many sharks need killed

They’ll never admit that.

That’s why there’s a long running shark tournament going on down here right now. The number of sharks is unreal.


I HATE sharks and shoot every one I can.


Aldeer.com Copyright 2001-2024 Aldeer LLP.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1
(Release build 20180111)
Page Time: 0.070s Queries: 16 (0.015s) Memory: 3.1893 MB (Peak: 3.4256 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2025-02-10 05:41:48 UTC
</a