|
|
Peanuts
by Gavin65. 11/21/24 09:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
23 registered members (Moss, Omega One, Gunner211, Etyson, LG, woodduck, Luxfisher, TurkeyJoe, Cactus_buck, janiemae, CCC, Crawfish, jaredhunts, 7mmSTW, CreekCrosser, dustymac, BC, BC_Reb, Gut Pile 32, fur_n_feathers, NoHuntin, capehorn24, Dragfan66),
586
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150336
06/19/24 01:20 PM
06/19/24 01:20 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 20,930 Northport, AL
GomerPyle
Impatient Stinky Britches Wearin’ Off-Roadin’ Guru
|
Impatient Stinky Britches Wearin’ Off-Roadin’ Guru
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 20,930
Northport, AL
|
These threads essentially are religion subforums….you only have to read the posts if you actively click on them. Otherwise, you don’t see them…
There are 3 certainties in an uncertain world:
1. All Politicians Are Liars 2. All Gun Laws Are an Infringement 3. Taxation Is Theft
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: GomerPyle]
#4150339
06/19/24 01:23 PM
06/19/24 01:23 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,509 Free State of Winston
FreeStateHunter
They Call Me Gator 🐊
|
They Call Me Gator 🐊
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,509
Free State of Winston
|
These threads essentially are religion subforums….you only have to read the posts if you actively click on them. Otherwise, you don’t see them…
You’re right, just hard not to click on them when every other post is one
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150343
06/19/24 01:25 PM
06/19/24 01:25 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299 Chilton County
MarksOutdoors
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299
Chilton County
|
Ecumenicalism is not something that should be ascribed to as bible-believing Christian. There is no fellowship with Catholicism, Greek Orthodox, Presbyterian Church USA because they have beliefs that are completely contrary with the Bible. Catholicism is Faith + Works = Salvation. Greek Orthodox worship is similar plus idol worship of icons. PCUSA ordains and baptized homosexuals.
Nicene Creed is not something too troubling since it comports to scripture. Apostles creed is more questionable regarding the line about Jesus descending into Hell. Respectfully, I don’t think you accurately express what Catholics or Orthodox believe. Neither of your examples of Catholic of Orthodox are what Catholics nor Orthodox would say they believe. Could be saved for another thread. At least this confirms that you follow the thought that there is no unity with anyone who has slightly different beliefs than you. So no room for ecuminism. Caveat here is that I’m not super knowledgeable on Sheol: I believe the understanding of Him descending into Hell was really the word (Sheol) refers to Him going and grabbing up the Righteous and bringing them to heaven. Sheol was understood in the Old Testament as a place everyone went, not like Hell where the unrepentant sinners are damned. So the Righteous that followed God such as Abraham, Moses, the prophets etc. were Ephesians 4:8-10 “Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men. (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)” 10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. Psalms 16:10 Every member of the Roman Catholic clergy are the modern day Judaizers who distorted the Gospel by adding one additional requirement for salvation. This prompted the apostle Paul to write:”If any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!” (Gal. 1:9). The distortion of the Gospel according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church is diabolical (numbers in parenthesis represent paragraph numbers in the Catechism. I used to believe we had plenty in common until I really began to dig in and notice the significant differences. Straight from the Roman Catholic Catechism..... Salvation according to the Catholic Church is by “faith” plus: baptism (1256), the sacraments (1129), the Mass (1405), purgatory (1030), law keeping (2068), indulgences (1498) and good works (2016). All of these are easily found on the internet. I’m taking a look into these and will answer them directly later. All you have done so far is reference where they are discussed, you have not mentioned what they say or why they are contrary to scripture. For now, I think the onus would be on you to say how the teachings are contrary to the gospel. It is funny because Catholics say the same thing about Protestants, I.e. some of the things they teach are contrary to not only scripture but also to Church tradition "RCC 1498 - Through indulgences the faithful can obtain the remission of temporal punishment resulting from sin for themselves and also for the souls in Purgatory" There is absolutely nothing biblical about this. Same with the others. If the supremacy of scripture is important to you, like it was to Martin Luther, you'll look them up. I didn't even get in to them praying to Mary, a dead person, or confession to a priest, which completely circumvents Jesus as our high priest in Hebrews 4:14. I don't have time to walk you step-by-step through each and every one, but I've provided you plenty to look it up yourself, if it's important to you?
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." -G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150390
06/19/24 02:30 PM
06/19/24 02:30 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340 Alabama
gcr0003
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340
Alabama
|
Mark Outdoors: reply
Regarding the sacrament of confession/reconciliation. My understanding is that Catholics acknowledge that the power to forgive sins is solely from God as stated in the catechism references below; however, they also believe that Christ established a priesthood through the apostles, and he gave him the authority as the Church. So the priest is the earthly authority which you go to, and he says the words of forgiveness but it is Christ at work. Similar to the Jews, they had to take their offerings to a priest who sacrificed them for the forgiveness of their sins. The forgiveness of sins wasn’t from the power of the priests, it was all from God, but the priest acted in accordance with the authority God had given them.
Catholic view of biblical authority to forgive sins comes from John: “Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.”
CCC 1441: “Only God forgives sins. Since he is the Son of God, Jesus says of himself, ‘The Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins’ and exercises this divine power: ‘Your sins are forgiven.’ Further, by virtue of his divine authority he gives this power to men to exercise in his name. CCC 1442: “Christ has willed that in her prayer and life and action his whole Church should be the sign and instrument of the forgiveness and reconciliation that he acquired for us at the price of his blood. But he entrusted the exercise of the power of absolution to the apostolic ministry which he charged with the ‘ministry of reconciliation.’ The apostle is sent out ‘on behalf of Christ’ with ‘God making his appeal’ through him and pleading: ‘Be reconciled to God.’”
Last edited by gcr0003; 06/19/24 02:31 PM.
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150404
06/19/24 02:57 PM
06/19/24 02:57 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299 Chilton County
MarksOutdoors
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299
Chilton County
|
Mark Outdoors: reply
Regarding the sacrament of confession/reconciliation. My understanding is that Catholics acknowledge that the power to forgive sins is solely from God as stated in the catechism references below; however, they also believe that Christ established a priesthood through the apostles, and he gave him the authority as the Church. So the priest is the earthly authority which you go to, and he says the words of forgiveness but it is Christ at work. Similar to the Jews, they had to take their offerings to a priest who sacrificed them for the forgiveness of their sins. The forgiveness of sins wasn’t from the power of the priests, it was all from God, but the priest acted in accordance with the authority God had given them.
Catholic view of biblical authority to forgive sins comes from John: “Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.”
CCC 1441: “Only God forgives sins. Since he is the Son of God, Jesus says of himself, ‘The Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins’ and exercises this divine power: ‘Your sins are forgiven.’ Further, by virtue of his divine authority he gives this power to men to exercise in his name. CCC 1442: “Christ has willed that in her prayer and life and action his whole Church should be the sign and instrument of the forgiveness and reconciliation that he acquired for us at the price of his blood. But he entrusted the exercise of the power of absolution to the apostolic ministry which he charged with the ‘ministry of reconciliation.’ The apostle is sent out ‘on behalf of Christ’ with ‘God making his appeal’ through him and pleading: ‘Be reconciled to God.’” How do those square with RCC 1498 about indulgences being relief from sin? That's a work. We are justified through our faith in Christ. The Council of Trent disagreed and required works. "If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema" - Council of Trent 1547
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." -G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: MarksOutdoors]
#4150407
06/19/24 03:12 PM
06/19/24 03:12 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340 Alabama
gcr0003
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340
Alabama
|
Mark Outdoors: reply
Regarding the sacrament of confession/reconciliation. My understanding is that Catholics acknowledge that the power to forgive sins is solely from God as stated in the catechism references below; however, they also believe that Christ established a priesthood through the apostles, and he gave him the authority as the Church. So the priest is the earthly authority which you go to, and he says the words of forgiveness but it is Christ at work. Similar to the Jews, they had to take their offerings to a priest who sacrificed them for the forgiveness of their sins. The forgiveness of sins wasn’t from the power of the priests, it was all from God, but the priest acted in accordance with the authority God had given them.
Catholic view of biblical authority to forgive sins comes from John: “Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.”
CCC 1441: “Only God forgives sins. Since he is the Son of God, Jesus says of himself, ‘The Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins’ and exercises this divine power: ‘Your sins are forgiven.’ Further, by virtue of his divine authority he gives this power to men to exercise in his name. CCC 1442: “Christ has willed that in her prayer and life and action his whole Church should be the sign and instrument of the forgiveness and reconciliation that he acquired for us at the price of his blood. But he entrusted the exercise of the power of absolution to the apostolic ministry which he charged with the ‘ministry of reconciliation.’ The apostle is sent out ‘on behalf of Christ’ with ‘God making his appeal’ through him and pleading: ‘Be reconciled to God.’” How do those relate to RCC 1498 about indulgences being relief from sin? That's a work. We are justified through our faith in Christ. The Council of Trent disagreed and required works. "If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema" - Council of Trent 1547 Let’s keep topics together. I responded to one of your 4-5 comments claiming that certain Catholic beliefs are unbiblical. This one was specifically on reconciliation. Where you said it circumvents Christ. Given that the Catholic catechism says it’s Gods power, but authority given to priests, supported by Jesus’ words in the Gospel of John, how do you respond? You didn’t acknowledge anything I provided I’ll be happy to respond to your other questions, it just takes time to type out. Which topic would you like me to address first?
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: GomerPyle]
#4150409
06/19/24 03:13 PM
06/19/24 03:13 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554 Boxes Cove
2Dogs
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554
Boxes Cove
|
One of the major hang ups discussed at the SBC for baptists in incorporating the Nicene creed is the line “I believe in ONE baptism for the FORGIVENESS of sins”
My understanding is Baptists believe in believers baptism which is a decision made once someone has already been saved as an outward sign to the world, meaning that baptism is not salvific. Whereas the early church belief and the one reflected in the creed and Bible is that you are baptized for the forgiveness of your sins.
“Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” (Acts 2:38, KJV) The thief on the cross pretty much discredits any idea that the baptism, in and of itself, is anything more than an outward expression of faith. I am NOT saying that baptism isn’t important by any means, but the water isn’t what saves you The testator ( Jesus) had not died, Jesus was still alive and could perform miracles. Plenty of scripture supports Baptism. John 3: 3-7 Jesus himself , talking to Nicodemus tells us what must be done . John 3 : 5 " Verily, verily I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and the spirit , he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." IMHO , John 3: 3-7 are some of the most important verses in the Bible .
Last edited by 2Dogs; 06/19/24 03:34 PM.
"Why do you ask"?
Always vote the slowest path to socialism.
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150413
06/19/24 03:15 PM
06/19/24 03:15 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299 Chilton County
MarksOutdoors
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299
Chilton County
|
Mark Outdoors: reply
Regarding the sacrament of confession/reconciliation. My understanding is that Catholics acknowledge that the power to forgive sins is solely from God as stated in the catechism references below; however, they also believe that Christ established a priesthood through the apostles, and he gave him the authority as the Church. So the priest is the earthly authority which you go to, and he says the words of forgiveness but it is Christ at work. Similar to the Jews, they had to take their offerings to a priest who sacrificed them for the forgiveness of their sins. The forgiveness of sins wasn’t from the power of the priests, it was all from God, but the priest acted in accordance with the authority God had given them.
Catholic view of biblical authority to forgive sins comes from John: “Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.”
CCC 1441: “Only God forgives sins. Since he is the Son of God, Jesus says of himself, ‘The Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins’ and exercises this divine power: ‘Your sins are forgiven.’ Further, by virtue of his divine authority he gives this power to men to exercise in his name. CCC 1442: “Christ has willed that in her prayer and life and action his whole Church should be the sign and instrument of the forgiveness and reconciliation that he acquired for us at the price of his blood. But he entrusted the exercise of the power of absolution to the apostolic ministry which he charged with the ‘ministry of reconciliation.’ The apostle is sent out ‘on behalf of Christ’ with ‘God making his appeal’ through him and pleading: ‘Be reconciled to God.’” How do those relate to RCC 1498 about indulgences being relief from sin? That's a work. We are justified through our faith in Christ. The Council of Trent disagreed and required works. "If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema" - Council of Trent 1547 Let’s keep topics together. I responded to one of your 4-5 comments claiming that certain Catholic beliefs are unbiblical. This one was specifically on reconciliation. Where you said it circumvents Christ. Given that the Catholic catechism says it’s Gods power, but authority given to priests, supported by Jesus’ words in the Gospel of John, how do you respond? You didn’t acknowledge anything I provided I’ll be happy to respond to your other questions, it just takes time to type out. Which topic would you like me to address first? They're all related. They are all works above and beyond what scripture describes. These traditions/works of the RCC are held on par with the bible. I've listed several. Feel free to defend any of them. Additionally, from a former, 30 year Catholic.....https://www.forthegospel.org/watch/false-unity-with-roman-catholics
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." -G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: MarksOutdoors]
#4150424
06/19/24 03:40 PM
06/19/24 03:40 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340 Alabama
gcr0003
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340
Alabama
|
They're all related. They are all works above and beyond what scripture describes. These traditions/works of the RCC are held on par with the bible. I've listed several. Feel free to defend them.
Again, it appears you are deflecting from the response I gave you on confession. You can’t just say “everything Catholics do is works based and therefore unbiblical” and then tell me I have to defend 7 things all at once. How about a honest conversation where you acknowledge the information. I’m not asking you to buy into or agree with Catholicism I’m just asking you to not misrepresent it. So from the belief laid out in the catechism being in line with the Bible verse how can you still say it’s unbiblical? It may be different than your interpretation but you can’t say that it is not mentioned or supported anywhere in the Bible. The words come from Christ himself. And if you have another interpretation I’d like to hear if it’s your personal interpretation and understanding or your denomination/congregations belief. If you are willing to have a conversation, I’ll go into the next topic. Saying “you’re wrong” with no support isn’t a conversation.
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150431
06/19/24 03:54 PM
06/19/24 03:54 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554 Boxes Cove
2Dogs
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554
Boxes Cove
|
creeds or confessions of faith like the westminster the London conression ect. are not a Bible believing Christians authority.the preserved WORD OF GOD is my authority. The Bible isn’t your authority, YOUR interpretation of the Bible is your authority. In which case, you submit to no one and are your own authority. The creeds are based/built off scripture as a summary of the core beliefs of Christians. They aren’t suppose to contradict. Running with your view, What part of the Nicene Creed doesn’t jive with the Bible? Please give Specific examples please. Where in the Bible does it say we are to "believe in one holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" ?
"Why do you ask"?
Always vote the slowest path to socialism.
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150432
06/19/24 03:57 PM
06/19/24 03:57 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299 Chilton County
MarksOutdoors
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,299
Chilton County
|
They're all related. They are all works above and beyond what scripture describes. These traditions/works of the RCC are held on par with the bible. I've listed several. Feel free to defend them.
Again, it appears you are deflecting from the response I gave you on confession. You can’t just say “everything Catholics do is works based and therefore unbiblical” and then tell me I have to defend 7 things all at once. How about a honest conversation where you acknowledge the information. I’m not asking you to buy into or agree with Catholicism I’m just asking you to not misrepresent it. So from the belief laid out in the catechism being in line with the Bible verse how can you still say it’s unbiblical? It may be different than your interpretation but you can’t say that it is not mentioned or supported anywhere in the Bible. The words come from Christ himself. And if you have another interpretation I’d like to hear if it’s your personal interpretation and understanding or your denomination/congregations belief. If you are willing to have a conversation, I’ll go into the next topic. Saying “you’re wrong” with no support isn’t a conversation. Ok, let's not misquote what I said. I never stated that "everything Catholics do is works based". I provided several of their RCCs that, if you read through them, are clearly works in addition to faith that contradict salvation by faith alone. I also provided their statement from The Council of Trent which you've yet to address. It doesn't take much of an objective reading to understand that they are works. If you believe that scripture is the measure to which everything should be compared, provide scripture that supports those RCCs.
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." -G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: MarksOutdoors]
#4150441
06/19/24 04:17 PM
06/19/24 04:17 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554 Boxes Cove
2Dogs
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554
Boxes Cove
|
Ecumenicalism is not something that should be ascribed to as bible-believing Christian. There is no fellowship with Catholicism, Greek Orthodox, Presbyterian Church USA because they have beliefs that are completely contrary with the Bible. Catholicism is Faith + Works = Salvation. Greek Orthodox worship is similar plus idol worship of icons. PCUSA ordains and baptized homosexuals.
Nicene Creed is not something too troubling since it comports to scripture. Apostles creed is more questionable regarding the line about Jesus descending into Hell. The Bible never explicitly states that Jesus went to down to hell for the 3 days prior to the resurrection, but there are a few verses that allude to it. Additionally, a few things that support it: First, Jesus paid for our sins when he was sacrificed. The Bible is clear that the penalty for sin is death. An eternity apart from God. That is, Hell. Jesus didn’t pay part of our penalty, he paid it ALL. So it stands to reason that Jesus essentially spent an “eternity in Hell” for every single person who is saved. I realize that’s difficult for our mortal minds to comprehend, but no more so than many of the other things we believe as Christians. Second, as Jesus died, the last thing he said was “Father why have you forsaken me?” This is because Jesus took on the sin of every sinner, and God simply cannot be present with sin, hence Jesus was completely separated from God (the literal definition of Hell) Third, Jesus ascended to Heaven to be with God well after the resurrection. Remember he appeared to a lot of people over a 40-day period before ascending to Heaven. So, if he wasn’t in Heaven during that 3-day period between his death and resurrection, then that leaves only one option (unless you believe in purgatory which is not biblical) I know they ALLUDE to that, but I think it's important to stick strictly to what the text says and not to add or take anything away. Sometimes when I'm teaching, I make sure to let everyone know that "this is my opinion", so that they know that I'm not saying that this is what the scripture specifically says. I just think it's risky to make conclusions if it is not absolutely substantiated through scripture. I agree, MO.
"Why do you ask"?
Always vote the slowest path to socialism.
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: 2Dogs]
#4150446
06/19/24 04:31 PM
06/19/24 04:31 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340 Alabama
gcr0003
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340
Alabama
|
creeds or confessions of faith like the westminster the London conression ect. are not a Bible believing Christians authority.the preserved WORD OF GOD is my authority. The Bible isn’t your authority, YOUR interpretation of the Bible is your authority. In which case, you submit to no one and are your own authority. The creeds are based/built off scripture as a summary of the core beliefs of Christians. They aren’t suppose to contradict. Running with your view, What part of the Nicene Creed doesn’t jive with the Bible? Please give Specific examples please. Where in the Bible does it say we are to "believe in one holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" ? I would say one Catholic (universal) church is talked about here: “That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.” (John 17:21, KJV) I’d also say that the Church is talked about as the Bride of Christ and also as the spiritual body of Christ. Christ would neither have two or more bodies or brides. What that unity or oneness looks like today I’m not sure but it’s pretty clear that Christ intended unity among Christians to the glory of the Father. And my verse earlier where Jesus breathes on the Apostles and gives them the authority to bind and loose sins. Not to mention the countless verses where Christ returns and is teaching the apostles. It’s pretty clear from Christs whole ministry that the 12 Apostles were chosen to lead the church one Christ had risen up. “And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.” (Matthew 28:18-20, KJV) And the last supper after going to the upper room he tells the Apostles to “do this in remembrance of me” So yea one church founded by Christ, passed down through the apostles, as one, as the Father Son and Holy Spirit are one.
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150452
06/19/24 04:56 PM
06/19/24 04:56 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554 Boxes Cove
2Dogs
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 36,554
Boxes Cove
|
creeds or confessions of faith like the westminster the London conression ect. are not a Bible believing Christians authority.the preserved WORD OF GOD is my authority. The Bible isn’t your authority, YOUR interpretation of the Bible is your authority. In which case, you submit to no one and are your own authority. The creeds are based/built off scripture as a summary of the core beliefs of Christians. They aren’t suppose to contradict. Running with your view, What part of the Nicene Creed doesn’t jive with the Bible? Please give Specific examples please. Where in the Bible does it say we are to "believe in one holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" ? I would say one Catholic (universal) church is talked about here: “That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.” (John 17:21, KJV) I’d also say that the Church is talked about as the Bride of Christ and also as the spiritual body of Christ. Christ would neither have two or more bodies or brides. What that unity or oneness looks like today I’m not sure but it’s pretty clear that Christ intended unity among Christians to the glory of the Father. And my verse earlier where Jesus breathes on the Apostles and gives them the authority to bind and loose sins. Not to mention the countless verses where Christ returns and is teaching the apostles. It’s pretty clear from Christs whole ministry that the 12 Apostles were chosen to lead the church one Christ had risen up. “And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.” (Matthew 28:18-20, KJV) And the last supper after going to the upper room he tells the Apostles to “do this in remembrance of me” So yea one church founded by Christ, passed down through the apostles, as one, as the Father Son and Holy Spirit are one. Mathew 16 : 18 does NOT say , upon this rock I will build the Catholic Church. I'm sorry, I'm not buying what you're selling Sir.
"Why do you ask"?
Always vote the slowest path to socialism.
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: gcr0003]
#4150456
06/19/24 05:08 PM
06/19/24 05:08 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 16,820 Ourtown, AL
BCLC
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 16,820
Ourtown, AL
|
A minion outbreak would realign the planets just in time for the summer solstice. 👀
We’re not dead. We just smell that way. Dayum. - AC870
Yessir! I’m always gonna shoot what makes me happy and I want everyone else to do the same! If you shoot one be proud of it and don’t worry what anyone else thinks. - SJ22
|
|
|
Re: SBC spin off, Nicene Creed and Ecuminism
[Re: MarksOutdoors]
#4150465
06/19/24 05:27 PM
06/19/24 05:27 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340 Alabama
gcr0003
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,340
Alabama
|
They're all related. They are all works above and beyond what scripture describes. These traditions/works of the RCC are held on par with the bible. I've listed several. Feel free to defend them.
Again, it appears you are deflecting from the response I gave you on confession. You can’t just say “everything Catholics do is works based and therefore unbiblical” and then tell me I have to defend 7 things all at once. How about a honest conversation where you acknowledge the information. I’m not asking you to buy into or agree with Catholicism I’m just asking you to not misrepresent it. So from the belief laid out in the catechism being in line with the Bible verse how can you still say it’s unbiblical? It may be different than your interpretation but you can’t say that it is not mentioned or supported anywhere in the Bible. The words come from Christ himself. And if you have another interpretation I’d like to hear if it’s your personal interpretation and understanding or your denomination/congregations belief. If you are willing to have a conversation, I’ll go into the next topic. Saying “you’re wrong” with no support isn’t a conversation. Ok, let's not misquote what I said. I never stated that "everything Catholics do is works based". I provided several of their RCCs that, if you read through them, are clearly works in addition to faith that contradict salvation by faith alone. I also provided their statement from The Council of Trent which you've yet to address. It doesn't take much of an objective reading to understand that they are works. If you believe that scripture is the measure to which everything should be compared, provide scripture that supports those RCCs. CCC 2003: “Grace is first and foremost the gift of the Spirit who justifies and sanctifies us. But grace also includes the gifts that the Spirit grants us to associate us with his work, to enable us to collaborate in the salvation of others and in the growth of the Body of Christ, the Church.” CCC 2008: “The merit of man before God in the Christian life arises from the fact that God has freely chosen to associate man with the work of his grace. The fatherly action of God is first on his own initiative, and then follows man’s free acting through his collaboration, so that the merit of good works is to be attributed in the first place to the grace of God, then to the faithful.” So they believe by faith and works they are justified but the works come from God, so they are justified by the grace of God living in them producing works. Protestants would say that they are saved by grace through faith, but through that faith you are to produce good works. Well what happens if you don’t produce good works? They would also say once saved always saved. So if you are saved and not producing good works you would then say well the faith wasn’t real? How many works would you need to produce to validate your faith? You’re still in the same pickle because you acknowledge that works have to accompany faith, you would just say faith comes first. Catholics would say grace comes first then through faith you simultaneously produce works. They are not exclusive. The common ground is that they both acknowledge that they merit no salvation and that it is solely from God through Jesus Christ. James 2:17-26 (KJV): 17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. 18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. 19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. 20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? 22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. 24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. 25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way? 26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
|
|
|
|