|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 registered members (Weedpicker, Dragfan66, deadeye, beerhunter, Okatuppa, AU67Skeeter, hue, Ryano, Yellahammer, mdavis, Skillet, Tracker, Marengo hunter, BCLC, Thisldu, Squadron77, goodman_hunter, JohnG, GoldenEagle, crocker, 7PTSPREAD, AUSKEETER, Tree Dweller, RAmerica, Ruger7mag, Ridge Life, Meatn3, limabean, TGreen, JBrown1975, turkey247, Copes, Skinner, jacannon, FlyDown02, seminole1, BurningBright, JA, 4ssss, Dead down wind, canine933, RSmith, doublefistful, SnipeHunter, straycat, HDS64, top cat, Gav-n-Tn, Shaneomac2, tombo51, Driveby, Fishduck, GomerPyle, Beer Belly, bamacotton, Koba, cch, clayk, BPI, jbatey1, Geeb, klay, outdoorguy88, blade, stl32, JDW25, HURRICANE, jake44, USeeMSpurs, Morris, JSOG47, BC, MarkAlan, desertdog, montoyafan, Chiller, YellaLineHunter, Turberville, CeeHawk37, bamamed1, chuck216, dagwood, MikeP, GKM, leroycnbucks, oldandwise, fur_n_feathers, AJones, 10 POINT, BradB, Raspy, jtillery, buzzard, XVIII, fourfive45, Parker243, georgiaboy1970, Catbird, Ron Brown, Ragu, BearBranch, CrappieMan, globe, Fishbones, TideWJO, jaredhunts, DGAMBLER, Jweeks, Cahabariverrat, twaldrop4, Mike32, 15 invisible),
366
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: OnX or HuntStand?
[Re: Antlerfluke]
#4179766
08/13/24 11:13 AM
08/13/24 11:13 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 421
Auburn, AL
Antlerfluke
OP
4 point
|
OP
4 point
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 421
Auburn, AL
|
Edit!!! My son and I share an OnX subscription. To be fair to OnX... here is what happened when I started this thread. This past weekend, I was looking at my son's OnX on his iPhone and it was clear as day!! The imagery was great and, on my iPhone, the imagery was blurry. So I played with my setting on my OnX app and duhhhhh, I got the OnX app to show much better imagery!! So, THAT was my complaint about OnX and when compared to HuntStand, HS was much better in its satellite photos.
I shake my head and want to ask OnX, "Who wants to see blurry imagery???" Because someone like me may see the blurry satellite imagery and be unsatisfied. So OnX, don't even let your users be able to see blurry satellite images when MUCH more clearer images are available with a click and no extra costs. I mean, who wants to see blurry images when clearer images are available with a click? Just take the blurry option off the table!! Geezzzzzz!!!
Thought I'd give OnX credit as my complaint was imagery and I fixed it but it wasn't because OnX made it easy or known!!!
|
|
|
|
