|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
13 registered members (Longtine, sw1002, russellb, beetrapper, T-hatchie, Turkeyneck78, Johnal3, Duals, 4Him146, bhammedic84, Morris, 2 invisible),
2,218
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: thayerp81]
#4193451
09/09/24 11:48 AM
09/09/24 11:48 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,286 Auburn Al
mauvilla
OP
8 point
|
OP
8 point
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,286
Auburn Al
|
I feel like I need to add, if you want to AI any cartridge, there are few that will gain you more performance than the jumpo from 280-280AI. it's a wonderful cartridge, but as mentioned certainly not NECESSARY for lower 48 deer hunting. you will see a 200-300 FPS gain in velocities though depending on bullet/ powder combo This is exactly about what I've come up with from researching it. Thanks for the info
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: thayerp81]
#4193533
09/09/24 02:40 PM
09/09/24 02:40 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 19,733 North AL
AU338MAG
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 19,733
North AL
|
I feel like I need to add, if you want to AI any cartridge, there are few that will gain you more performance than the jumpo from 280-280AI. it's a wonderful cartridge, but as mentioned certainly not NECESSARY for lower 48 deer hunting. you will see a 200-300 FPS gain in velocities though depending on bullet/ powder combo Truth is, if you load a 280 Remington the way it should be the difference is less. Because Remington handicapped the 280 from the beginning when it was submitted for SAMMI approval, it has a lower MAP rating. If your using a bolt action rifle, it can be safely loaded to higher pressure/velocity than what is shown in the loading guides.
Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales
Molon Labe
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: mauvilla]
#4193553
09/09/24 03:06 PM
09/09/24 03:06 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,990 Tuscaloosa Co.
N2TRKYS
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,990
Tuscaloosa Co.
|
The 280 is large enough to moose hunt with already, so no need to AI it.
83% of all statistics are made up.
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: mauvilla]
#4195255
09/12/24 09:15 AM
09/12/24 09:15 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,750 B'ham
Goatkiller
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,750
B'ham
|
Best thing I ever did with my .280 was stick a .338 bullet in the end of it and make a 338-280 out of it.
Yea I did that instead of using the '06 case. Back late 1980's timeframe. Still have it selling rifles that shoot under MOA is sort of against my upbringing.
No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: riflenut]
#4195499
09/12/24 03:40 PM
09/12/24 03:40 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,311 colbert county
cartervj
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,311
colbert county
|
I have an Abolt originally chambered in 280 that I grew bored with. Sent it to John Gallagher, had him rechamber it to 280 Ackley with a pre-SAAMI reamer, and cerakote the whole thing. Bedded it into a B&C Medalist. It's a legit 1/2 minute gun when I do my part. Does it do anything the 280 couldn't? No. But it sure as hell turned a safe queen into one of my favorites. If you want something different....go for it. Here's one from my initial fireforming session. Didn't let the barrel cool, didn't weigh powder charges, used some spare Hornady Interlocks jammed into the lands. That's 12 into about an inch without even trying. That is SWEET!!!!!!
“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: mauvilla]
#4199229
09/19/24 06:09 AM
09/19/24 06:09 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,079 Jasper
buckhunter2
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,079
Jasper
|
For deer and occasional Mule Deer . I's there enough benefit as far as it all goes to covert a 280 REM to a 280 AI No-
You're only as good as your worst shot-
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: buckhunter2]
#4199445
09/19/24 12:29 PM
09/19/24 12:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,653 GA
UncleHuck
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,653
GA
|
For deer and occasional Mule Deer . I's there enough benefit as far as it all goes to covert a 280 REM to a 280 AI No- But we don't all do this just for the efficiency. If we did, everyone would shoot a .308 or a .30-06. I am exceptionally happy with my .280 Ackley. I have taken animals up to red stag with it, and most never even took a step. If I had to choose a single rifle (what a horrible thought!) to hunt the lower 48, the 280 AI would be my choice.
|
|
|
Re: 280 Rem vs 280 AI
[Re: thayerp81]
#4221680
11/01/24 08:02 AM
11/01/24 08:02 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,478 Demop
1bamashooter
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,478
Demop
|
I feel like I need to add, if you want to AI any cartridge, there are few that will gain you more performance than the jumpo from 280-280AI. it's a wonderful cartridge, but as mentioned certainly not NECESSARY for lower 48 deer hunting. you will see a 200-300 FPS gain in velocities though depending on bullet/ powder combo Yes sir. I've had 243 260 280 and 300 Ackleys over the years they all gained velocity of course but the 280 really shines with that blown out shoulder.
Keep your booger hooker off the bang switch.
|
|
|
|