|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peanuts
by Jwoods32. 11/21/24 03:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
125 registered members (DGAMBLER, dave260rem!, TurkeyJoe, BCLC, twaldrop4, MGrubber, T-hatchie, MS_Hunter, Paint Rock 00, YellaLineHunter, Grokamole, woodduck, biglmbass, Chiller, apolloslade, zwick, SC53, outdoorguy88, TDog93, joe sixpack, rhino21, Jwoods32, sawdust, Bustinbeards, OutdoorsAL, cartervj, jlbuc10, Overland, dawgdr, deerman24, JCL, AU7MM08, Atoler, Raspy, fish_blackbass, 3006bullet, Cutem, Young20, desertdog, mossyback, WDE, Cactus_buck, Bamajoz, Longtine, Big Al, dirtwrk, Flyliner, CNC, Bmyers142, HURRICANE, hhsdc78, !shiloh!, HoofNSpur, AJones, BhamFred, klay, Zzzfog, johnv, CarbonClimber1, C3SEAST, Madmax0818, russellb, RidgeRanger, beeline08, chrismims, janiemae, stuball, Albowhntr2, Safetyman, Hornhntr, lukecc, Ryano, bug54, Crappie, Stoney, Geeb, brianr, Calvin, lefthorn, Mansfield, Bread, jaredhunts, centralala, DoeNut, Bull64, thayerp81, GHTiger10, laylandad, Frankie, Ridge Life, JugHead55, S_Dubs, 7x57_Mauser, Pwyse, CAL, jwalker77, 2walnuts, Prohunter3509, treemydog, Bowfish, roll_tide_hunts, BC_Reb, BamaGuitarDude, Fattyfireplug, 3bailey3, brushwhacker, NotsoBright, Sqzpla, Skullworks, Reaper, mzzy, JohnnyLoco, 13 invisible),
743
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
#4229767
11/14/24 12:51 PM
11/14/24 12:51 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,131
Right Behind You
William
OP
Old Mossy Horns
|
OP
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,131
Right Behind You
|
Coosa Slot LimitThe Alabama Wildlife & Freshwater Fisheries Division (AWFFD) has proposed a plan to institute a 14- to 20-inch tournament-only slot limit for all six lakes on the Coosa River. This proposal is in response to research conducted by Auburn University that tracked bass mortality rates on Neely Henry Reservoir in Alabama over the last three years. So..... Either weigh a 6 lb limit or a 20+ lb limit. Seems reasonable.
"The misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing... compared to the misery of not being exploited at all."
Joan Robinson
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: BCLC]
#4229783
11/14/24 01:53 PM
11/14/24 01:53 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,326
blade
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,326
|
You would weigh-in fish that are in the slot not outside of it. Only 14-20in fish could be weighed. Bigger fish would have to be released and short fish have always been a no-no BCLC, it appears by reading the last paragraph or so that 14-20 is the protected, not over and under. “Initially, tournament weights will be significantly impacted as there are currently very few fish exceeding the upper end of the protective slot. However, each year, survival and growth of fish protected by the slot limit will result in increases in abundance of fish over 20-inches in length. Perhaps the greatest benefit of this regulation would be to increase voluntary participation in catch-weigh-release tournament formats. This would allow tournament organizations to credit its competitors with catches of all fish within the protective slot limit. Their immediate release following the catch and weighing would reduce tournament mortality to near zero.”
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: blade]
#4230262
11/15/24 10:15 AM
11/15/24 10:15 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,345
Sylacauga, AL
poorcountrypreacher
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,345
Sylacauga, AL
|
You would weigh-in fish that are in the slot not outside of it. Only 14-20in fish could be weighed. Bigger fish would have to be released and short fish have always been a no-no BCLC, it appears by reading the last paragraph or so that 14-20 is the protected, not over and under. “Initially, tournament weights will be significantly impacted as there are currently very few fish exceeding the upper end of the protective slot. However, each year, survival and growth of fish protected by the slot limit will result in increases in abundance of fish over 20-inches in length. Perhaps the greatest benefit of this regulation would be to increase voluntary participation in catch-weigh-release tournament formats. This would allow tournament organizations to credit its competitors with catches of all fish within the protective slot limit. Their immediate release following the catch and weighing would reduce tournament mortality to near zero.” I agree that it's poorly written, but their intention is that only fish between 14 and 20" can be weighed. I don't think most tournaments will object to the 14" minimum limit; that's the way it is on a lot of lakes now. It's the nothing over 20" can be weighed that will really upset them. If this becomes the law, I think it would mean that BASS will never hold a tournament in the state. I don't fish tournaments, but I don't like separate state rules for tournaments and recreational fishermen. It would be much better, IMO, if the tournaments would voluntarily switch to some system of either weighing or measuring fish when caught. I wonder if it's even occurred to the state people that they could ask them, instead of forcing a convoluted regulation on them.
Last edited by poorcountrypreacher; 11/15/24 10:17 AM.
All the labor of man is for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not filled.
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#4230386
11/15/24 03:31 PM
11/15/24 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 16,820
Ourtown, AL
BCLC
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 16,820
Ourtown, AL
|
You would weigh-in fish that are in the slot not outside of it. Only 14-20in fish could be weighed. Bigger fish would have to be released and short fish have always been a no-no BCLC, it appears by reading the last paragraph or so that 14-20 is the protected, not over and under. “Initially, tournament weights will be significantly impacted as there are currently very few fish exceeding the upper end of the protective slot. However, each year, survival and growth of fish protected by the slot limit will result in increases in abundance of fish over 20-inches in length. Perhaps the greatest benefit of this regulation would be to increase voluntary participation in catch-weigh-release tournament formats. This would allow tournament organizations to credit its competitors with catches of all fish within the protective slot limit. Their immediate release following the catch and weighing would reduce tournament mortality to near zero.” I agree that it's poorly written, but their intention is that only fish between 14 and 20" can be weighed. I don't think most tournaments will object to the 14" minimum limit; that's the way it is on a lot of lakes now. It's the nothing over 20" can be weighed that will really upset them. If this becomes the law, I think it would mean that BASS will never hold a tournament in the state. I don't fish tournaments, but I don't like separate state rules for tournaments and recreational fishermen. It would be much better, IMO, if the tournaments would voluntarily switch to some system of either weighing or measuring fish when caught. I wonder if it's even occurred to the state people that they could ask them, instead of forcing a convoluted regulation on them. Major League Fishing has it figured out. Their format is far more logical. Catch, weigh, immediate release.
We’re not dead. We just smell that way. Dayum. - AC870
Yessir! I’m always gonna shoot what makes me happy and I want everyone else to do the same! If you shoot one be proud of it and don’t worry what anyone else thinks. - SJ22
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: BCLC]
#4230413
11/15/24 04:46 PM
11/15/24 04:46 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,345
Sylacauga, AL
poorcountrypreacher
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,345
Sylacauga, AL
|
You would weigh-in fish that are in the slot not outside of it. Only 14-20in fish could be weighed. Bigger fish would have to be released and short fish have always been a no-no BCLC, it appears by reading the last paragraph or so that 14-20 is the protected, not over and under. “Initially, tournament weights will be significantly impacted as there are currently very few fish exceeding the upper end of the protective slot. However, each year, survival and growth of fish protected by the slot limit will result in increases in abundance of fish over 20-inches in length. Perhaps the greatest benefit of this regulation would be to increase voluntary participation in catch-weigh-release tournament formats. This would allow tournament organizations to credit its competitors with catches of all fish within the protective slot limit. Their immediate release following the catch and weighing would reduce tournament mortality to near zero.” I agree that it's poorly written, but their intention is that only fish between 14 and 20" can be weighed. I don't think most tournaments will object to the 14" minimum limit; that's the way it is on a lot of lakes now. It's the nothing over 20" can be weighed that will really upset them. If this becomes the law, I think it would mean that BASS will never hold a tournament in the state. I don't fish tournaments, but I don't like separate state rules for tournaments and recreational fishermen. It would be much better, IMO, if the tournaments would voluntarily switch to some system of either weighing or measuring fish when caught. I wonder if it's even occurred to the state people that they could ask them, instead of forcing a convoluted regulation on them. Major League Fishing has it figured out. Their format is far more logical. Catch, weigh, immediate release. I agree. Plus, it's possible to format it so that every fish counts. I'm a lot more impressed by someone catching a bunch of fish instead of just 5. But BASS doesn't like this model because it kills the big weight in, and they are smart enough to understand that people want to witness a guy doing a lot of screaming instead of watching fishing. 
All the labor of man is for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not filled.
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: BCLC]
#4230414
11/15/24 04:47 PM
11/15/24 04:47 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 3,182
Dekalb
Jdkprp70
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 3,182
Dekalb
|
You would weigh-in fish that are in the slot not outside of it. Only 14-20in fish could be weighed. Bigger fish would have to be released and short fish have always been a no-no BCLC, it appears by reading the last paragraph or so that 14-20 is the protected, not over and under. “Initially, tournament weights will be significantly impacted as there are currently very few fish exceeding the upper end of the protective slot. However, each year, survival and growth of fish protected by the slot limit will result in increases in abundance of fish over 20-inches in length. Perhaps the greatest benefit of this regulation would be to increase voluntary participation in catch-weigh-release tournament formats. This would allow tournament organizations to credit its competitors with catches of all fish within the protective slot limit. Their immediate release following the catch and weighing would reduce tournament mortality to near zero.” I agree that it's poorly written, but their intention is that only fish between 14 and 20" can be weighed. I don't think most tournaments will object to the 14" minimum limit; that's the way it is on a lot of lakes now. It's the nothing over 20" can be weighed that will really upset them. If this becomes the law, I think it would mean that BASS will never hold a tournament in the state. I don't fish tournaments, but I don't like separate state rules for tournaments and recreational fishermen. It would be much better, IMO, if the tournaments would voluntarily switch to some system of either weighing or measuring fish when caught. I wonder if it's even occurred to the state people that they could ask them, instead of forcing a convoluted regulation on them. Major League Fishing has it figured out. Their format is far more logical. Catch, weigh, immediate release.
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#4230416
11/15/24 04:57 PM
11/15/24 04:57 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,131
Right Behind You
William
OP
Old Mossy Horns
|
OP
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,131
Right Behind You
|
I will say that a B.A.S.S. run event is exceptionally concerned with conservation. I've fished regionals and nationals where they have a release boat, weigh tanks, etc, etc. The local tournies are a different story regarding fish care.
"The misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing... compared to the misery of not being exploited at all."
Joan Robinson
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: poorcountrypreacher]
#4230658
11/16/24 06:16 AM
11/16/24 06:16 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,892
Pelham
Ben2
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,892
Pelham
|
You would weigh-in fish that are in the slot not outside of it. Only 14-20in fish could be weighed. Bigger fish would have to be released and short fish have always been a no-no BCLC, it appears by reading the last paragraph or so that 14-20 is the protected, not over and under. “Initially, tournament weights will be significantly impacted as there are currently very few fish exceeding the upper end of the protective slot. However, each year, survival and growth of fish protected by the slot limit will result in increases in abundance of fish over 20-inches in length. Perhaps the greatest benefit of this regulation would be to increase voluntary participation in catch-weigh-release tournament formats. This would allow tournament organizations to credit its competitors with catches of all fish within the protective slot limit. Their immediate release following the catch and weighing would reduce tournament mortality to near zero.” I agree that it's poorly written, but their intention is that only fish between 14 and 20" can be weighed. I don't think most tournaments will object to the 14" minimum limit; that's the way it is on a lot of lakes now. It's the nothing over 20" can be weighed that will really upset them. If this becomes the law, I think it would mean that BASS will never hold a tournament in the state. I don't fish tournaments, but I don't like separate state rules for tournaments and recreational fishermen. It would be much better, IMO, if the tournaments would voluntarily switch to some system of either weighing or measuring fish when caught. I wonder if it's even occurred to the state people that they could ask them, instead of forcing a convoluted regulation on them. way I read it says withing the protective slot limit meaning they want to protect the 14-20" fish by not weighing them in so only fish less than 14 and bigger than 20 could be weighed
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: Ben2]
#4230680
11/16/24 07:12 AM
11/16/24 07:12 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,345
Sylacauga, AL
poorcountrypreacher
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,345
Sylacauga, AL
|
You would weigh-in fish that are in the slot not outside of it. Only 14-20in fish could be weighed. Bigger fish would have to be released and short fish have always been a no-no BCLC, it appears by reading the last paragraph or so that 14-20 is the protected, not over and under. “Initially, tournament weights will be significantly impacted as there are currently very few fish exceeding the upper end of the protective slot. However, each year, survival and growth of fish protected by the slot limit will result in increases in abundance of fish over 20-inches in length. Perhaps the greatest benefit of this regulation would be to increase voluntary participation in catch-weigh-release tournament formats. This would allow tournament organizations to credit its competitors with catches of all fish within the protective slot limit. Their immediate release following the catch and weighing would reduce tournament mortality to near zero.” I agree that it's poorly written, but their intention is that only fish between 14 and 20" can be weighed. I don't think most tournaments will object to the 14" minimum limit; that's the way it is on a lot of lakes now. It's the nothing over 20" can be weighed that will really upset them. If this becomes the law, I think it would mean that BASS will never hold a tournament in the state. I don't fish tournaments, but I don't like separate state rules for tournaments and recreational fishermen. It would be much better, IMO, if the tournaments would voluntarily switch to some system of either weighing or measuring fish when caught. I wonder if it's even occurred to the state people that they could ask them, instead of forcing a convoluted regulation on them. way I read it says withing the protective slot limit meaning they want to protect the 14-20" fish by not weighing them in so only fish less than 14 and bigger than 20 could be weighed After reading it again, I see y'all are right. My apologies for confusing the discussion.
All the labor of man is for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not filled.
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: Uokman2014]
#4231988
11/18/24 11:40 PM
11/18/24 11:40 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 16,067
Brierfield
Beadlescomb
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 16,067
Brierfield
|
Personally, I think bass tournaments should be banned outright. If not banned - the state should charge $100 per boat in a tournament (any tournament) and that money go directly to game & fish to help enforce the requirement and into improvements at the lakes the fees were collected. In my opinion bass tournaments have had a negative impact on the resource and they kill more fish annually than recreational fishermen that keep some for eating. That's the dumbest phuckin thing I've ever heard
We will burn that bridge when we get there
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: Beadlescomb]
#4231990
11/18/24 11:55 PM
11/18/24 11:55 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,340
chilton, co.
hayman
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 4,340
chilton, co.
|
Personally, I think bass tournaments should be banned outright. If not banned - the state should charge $100 per boat in a tournament (any tournament) and that money go directly to game & fish to help enforce the requirement and into improvements at the lakes the fees were collected. In my opinion bass tournaments have had a negative impact on the resource and they kill more fish annually than recreational fishermen that keep some for eating. That's the dumbest phuckin thing I've ever heard I don’t like them either. Been a part of a couple but they ain’t for me and they seem to cause problems everywhere.
“Everything Woke Turns To SH_T” Donald J. Trump
|
|
|
Re: Proposed Slot Limit on all Coosa River Lakes
[Re: William]
#4232844
Yesterday at 03:35 PM
Yesterday at 03:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,556
Lawrence Co. AL
jdhunter2011
8 Point
|
8 Point
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,556
Lawrence Co. AL
|
I wish It would pass state wide. Randy explains it pretty well. I would add that slot limits should be adjusted to specific lakes where the Science sees its needed. I also think it if they are gonna put a slot in it should be for everyone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b09WSIsxB7c
Its not the will to win but the will to prepare to win!
|
|
|
|
