|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 registered members (sevenup, Tree Dweller, Bulls eye, Mulcher, Gut Pile 32, BAR1225, BraeBuckner, MIB, BCLC, jaderhold, wareagle22, AMB, Butchman205, sawdust, Cactus_buck, lpman, jwyatt, Big Game Hunter, TexasHuntress, Daveleeal, fr8-shkr, Semo, 007, laylandad, Stacey, 3blades, Geeb, dave260rem!, RidgeRanger, woodduck, Darrylcom, Hunting-231, slipperyrock, UncleHuck, Floorman1, tallapoosa, 380jeff, desertdog, apolloslade, Mdees, JSanford1974, Joe4majors, 2 invisible),
599
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Scope under 1k for deer rifle
[Re: UncleHuck]
#4250626
12/23/24 07:22 AM
12/23/24 07:22 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,964 Montgomery,al,usa
Davyalabama
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,964
Montgomery,al,usa
|
Unless you are dialing for very long shots, you won't notice a difference between 1" and 30 mm.
There is a difference at the high end of the scale, but for what you discussed initially, you would never notice the difference.
You're talking a 3x9x40 for 100-300 yard shots in your post, 1" should be fine. It will also be less weight than a 30mm and you can get it lower on your gun, also a plus, yeah it's only a .15 or so of an inch but ... If you were wanting 30mm, I would go on and step up to 50 or 56 to let the larger tube run.
“If you do not conquer self, you will be conquered by self.” Napoleon Hill The most difficult thing to understand during conversation is silence. Thoreau
|
|
|
|