|
|
|
LFTSH
by RUGRAT45. 12/27/24 06:20 AM
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 registered members (matthewgentry, Peach, jlbuc10, G/H, Jmfire722, Davyalabama, Fishhead706, Hunting-231, Dean, jaderhold, Beadlescomb, hayman, XVIII, Squeaky, eclipse829, CNC, HBWALKER14, Driveby, cmontgomery, scrubbuck, Epalm88, crenshawco, cartervj, furnfeather, Bread, Skinner, RocN151, jaredhunts, Xbow, Luxfisher, Tree Dweller, Auburn_03, Ray_Coon, bamacotton, catdoctor, 3Gs, Coosa buck, georgiaboy1970, HJunkn2910, dustymac, USeeMSpurs, BamaRick, JohnG, Flyliner, Tracker, beano1, Jay512, Young20, rblaker, Red Fox, Bull64, T-Rock, geeb1, HURRICANE, MarkCollin, BD, tombo51, Bruno, twaldrop4, StateLine, Jerstwrt, RUGRAT45, TurkeyJoe, k bush, UABCPA, WC82, 700ltr308, CatfishJunkie, J_Martin, Scott4Hunting, CeeHawk37, Pwyse, doghouse, wk2hnt, bhammedic84, AWT6, Sandmtnslayer, Booger, 000buck, 6 invisible),
357
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Aging by Teeth DeerAge.com? - Thoughts?
#4252383
Yesterday at 03:03 PM
Yesterday at 03:03 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 789 Alabama
chevydude2015
OP
4 point
|
OP
4 point
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 789
Alabama
|
Has anyone ever used the service DeerAge.com offers? They claim it is more accurate than aging by wear but I don't know anything about it. Curious if any of the resident experts know anything about it? https://deerage.com/services-and-pricing/
Last edited by chevydude2015; Yesterday at 03:09 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Aging by Teeth DeerAge.com? - Thoughts?
[Re: chevydude2015]
#4252389
Yesterday at 03:21 PM
Yesterday at 03:21 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 29,389 Fosters, Alabama, USA
Shaw
Administrator
|
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 29,389
Fosters, Alabama, USA
|
Don’t know about that particular company, but the way they do it is the only accurate way to truly age a whitetail.
"I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it." Captain Woodrow F. Call
|
|
|
Re: Aging by Teeth DeerAge.com? - Thoughts?
[Re: Mbrock]
#4252497
Yesterday at 06:55 PM
Yesterday at 06:55 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,068 colbert county
cartervj
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,068
colbert county
|
It’s WAY better than using tooth wear and replacement. It’s not reliable after all the permanent teeth are in. One thing I’ve learned about tooth wear is it varies by individual and over about 3 years of age it’s a guess at best. Some follow the rules, some don’t, and some are off so bad it leaves you scratching your head. Even on known aged deer all raised on the same diet tooth wear varies tremendously. I wonder when that’ll be recognized and changed I’ve read where the enamel layers are sometimes wrong.
“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
Re: Aging by Teeth DeerAge.com? - Thoughts?
[Re: cartervj]
#4252545
Yesterday at 08:26 PM
Yesterday at 08:26 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,000 Right behind you
Mbrock
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,000
Right behind you
|
It’s WAY better than using tooth wear and replacement. It’s not reliable after all the permanent teeth are in. One thing I’ve learned about tooth wear is it varies by individual and over about 3 years of age it’s a guess at best. Some follow the rules, some don’t, and some are off so bad it leaves you scratching your head. Even on known aged deer all raised on the same diet tooth wear varies tremendously. I wonder when that’ll be recognized and changed I’ve read where the enamel layers are sometimes wrong. I keep waiting on it. Biologists who only know text books still hold to it. Biologists who actually manage properties and have familiarity with individual deer, their known ages, and keep good data will tell you it’s not very accurate.
|
|
|
Re: Aging by Teeth DeerAge.com? - Thoughts?
[Re: Mbrock]
#4252615
Yesterday at 10:13 PM
Yesterday at 10:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,066 Hoover
burbank
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,066
Hoover
|
It’s WAY better than using tooth wear and replacement. It’s not reliable after all the permanent teeth are in. One thing I’ve learned about tooth wear is it varies by individual and over about 3 years of age it’s a guess at best. Some follow the rules, some don’t, and some are off so bad it leaves you scratching your head. Even on known aged deer all raised on the same diet tooth wear varies tremendously. I wonder when that’ll be recognized and changed I’ve read where the enamel layers are sometimes wrong. I keep waiting on it. Biologists who only know text books still hold to it. Biologists who actually manage properties and have familiarity with individual deer, their known ages, and keep good data will tell you it’s not very accurate. This. Take 10 Eighty year old humans. You can’t age them by teeth alone IMO.
|
|
|
|