|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
13 registered members (woodduck, Tupi, CreekCrosser, bhammedic84, BC, sw1002, deadeye48, AHolcomb, Okalona, eclipse829, Tfh5525, 2 invisible),
934
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Breeding data
#4284110
Yesterday at 08:49 PM
Yesterday at 08:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,320 Right behind you
Mbrock
OP
Fancy
|
OP
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,320
Right behind you
|
I’m not sure if the state is recording conception data or not at the moment, but I decided to check a few does in Fayette County that has been under strict harvest criteria and management for a very long time. We’ve collected data on harvested deer since 2007. We collected conception data for at least 2 years, and maybe 3. I can’t remember. Either way, the average conception dates when we initially took data several years ago was Jan 6th one year and Jan 8th the next. I do remember having those two sets of data. It’s the third I can’t remember. Over the last few days I’ve taken fetuses from 3 does, all carrying twins, with conception dates of 12/24, 12/29 and 1/1. What would be interesting to know, is if that date would change if I had a larger sample size, OR if we’ve made that much difference in the breeding timing over the years by improving habitat and correcting sex ratios. I clearly remember having some late January does in our original samples, but always assumed it was their second cycle, which skews the data. Now that we have a ratio more representative of what we were trying to achieve, it seems the later rutting activity has been largely removed. We don’t see as much hard chasing and crazy behavior after MLK day. My theory has always been that one reason AL has such later breeding dates has more to do with mismanagement and poor sex ratios than anything else. Breeding is definitely later in parts of south AL and areas in north AL where southern deer were used in restocking, but it’s been made worse by the sex ratio issues prevalent in so many areas.
Just thought yall may find that interesting, especially those of you from the Fayette, Marion, Lamar, Tuscaloosa, Pickens areas, which always had dates within a few days of this property in Fayette.
|
|
|
Re: Breeding data
[Re: Scout74]
#4284124
Yesterday at 09:07 PM
Yesterday at 09:07 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,320 Right behind you
Mbrock
OP
Fancy
|
OP
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,320
Right behind you
|
Have you seen any conception dates around the last week of November there? Never. I’ve seen a few around Dec 10-15th.
|
|
|
Re: Breeding data
[Re: Mbrock]
#4284145
Yesterday at 09:33 PM
Yesterday at 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517 Mobile, AL
Pwyse
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517
Mobile, AL
|
Matt how do you know the exact conception dates of the fetuses? My measurements or weights?
Last edited by Pwyse; Yesterday at 09:37 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Breeding data
[Re: Mbrock]
#4284151
Yesterday at 09:37 PM
Yesterday at 09:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517 Mobile, AL
Pwyse
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517
Mobile, AL
|
You measure the fetuses to get the exact conception date. That’s pretty cool.
|
|
|
Re: Breeding data
[Re: Bankheadhunter]
#4284181
Yesterday at 10:26 PM
Yesterday at 10:26 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,320 Right behind you
Mbrock
OP
Fancy
|
OP
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,320
Right behind you
|
States doing nothing I can assure you of that. Thanks for the information Brock, we appreciate it. We collected data for years, but had stopped by the time I left. I’ve heard it’s no longer a priority. 🤷🏼♂️
|
|
|
|