S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
61 members (hunter84, BC, Ragu, Chaser357, Bigem1958, stl32, centralala, HURRICANE, Poplar_Springs, Lvlhdd, BCLC, Bamarich2, GomerPyle, hallb, oakachoy, fur_n_feathers, CeeHawk37, Gobble4me757, ShaftOne, duckbuster, BPI, AUdeerhunter, Remi296, coosabuckhunter, Woodsy, dwoliver, Mbrock, Stu, RockFarmer, 10 POINT, rrice0725, healy4au, RSmith, Fishduck, trlrdrdave, Turkey, coldtrail, Ol’Tom, Morgan, dtmwtp, longshot, Skullworks, BAR1225, Birdman83, dsmc, DEDTRKY, StateLine, Downwind, WhoMe, NoHuntin, effinacotton, goodman_hunter, Shmoe, crenshawco, Guru, Hunting-231, 5 invisible),
1,086
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,463
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,463 |
So how many properties do you manage that have required killing more bucks than does to correct the balance?
Yes, it’s absolutely about killing does as well as managing habitat. There’s a difference between an educated decision to kill a certain number of does and “blasting the bleep out of does” So what is lost when you kill a doe that needs to be killed? Uh, I don’t know, maybe deer? For every doe you kill, you kill every fawn she will ever have. Some of those fawns are bucks. I guess I’m just saying it’s a fine balance in my mind. And typically, unless you have 1000s of acres or a high fence it will never be close to an exact science. It’s not an exact science, and it’s precisely why I tell most of my clients to get the numbers where we would like to get them in relation to habitat, and at that point we will modify harvest annually. It’s a fluid target. Very few properties can withstand heavy doe harvest indefinitely. BUT, it is a tool. It’s like driving 80 mph on the interstate. That’s fine until you hit a back road. When conditions change you have to adjust your speed.
|
|
|
|
|