Lots of folks are tore up about that strategy, but I’m over here thinking it was their way of smoking out those that aren’t actually working or maybe don’t even exist. I’d highly doubt that anyone who replied to the email got canned from their responses alone. If they got let go, they were getting let go anyway. In the mean time, Elon and Trump hopefully got a whole list of “workers” that aren’t working at all and need to go. [/quote]

Musk back-tracked and supposedly extended the deadline for a response, said it was to see who checked their email lol. If that's the case it shows how really stupid the idea was. No one checks work email on a Saturday if not required.
I think the job cuts are a "chop" job and they'll come back and hire people where needed instead of putting much forethought in to it and if that's the case it's a dumb idea since it could put individuals in to a financial bind.[/quote]


A financial bind? Like 33 trillion in a bind? By all means let's borrow more money so that doesn't happen. A study is what this country really needs....[/quote]

LOL, some of you are funny. I never said all firings were wrong, I've stated multiple times that firing individuals that are in "known" positions that WILL require re-hiring is ignorant. It's not hard to understand that those individuals shouldn't be put in that spot. They're firing individuals to fire and the re-hire, it's a cut numbers game.