|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 registered members (crenshawco, gman, brett.smith, nomercy, tmhrmh1, DoubleShoalsJR, Luxfisher, COOTER, deno1, outdoorguy88, CatfishJunkie, 7mmSTW, Gobl4me, TurkeyJoe, quickshot, RCHRR, BamaBoHunter, Chancetribe, bug54, BPI, JohnnyLoco, Chiller, Tree Hanger, Solothurn, SC53, Maggie123, coosabuckhunter, Fattyfireplug, 25-20, TEM, filespinner, sportrep, hoggin, cartervj, MikeP, fish251, rutwad, fur_n_feathers, Bread, Elba thermal, BOFF, Whiskey9, Big AL 76, Big Al, graydw1, Gut Pile 32, apolloslade, UA Hunter, Ron A., PikeRoadHunter, weatherby, 3 invisible),
627
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Arkansas NR total cost?
[Re: sw1002]
#4295399
03/05/25 04:45 PM
03/05/25 04:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 368 NE Mississippi
deerhunt1988
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 368
NE Mississippi
|
I definitely agree, especially on the MS part. I live in Alabama but work in MS and pay taxes on a NATIONAL forest that I can’t hunt because the state says so. 3 straight years undrawn for me as well.
Non-residents can still hunt. They just have to draw. And each successive year is a record number of applicants in the non-resident draw. Odds were below 50% to draw this year. On the other hand, Florida just COMPLETELY ELIMINATED non-resident hunting the first 9 days of the season on one particular piece of Federal Land. If Mississippi was completely eliminating your opportunity to hunt National Forests, I could see your hate. You can't hate the state for taking care of its residents during this time of explosive non-resident turkey hunter growth.
|
|
|
|