|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 registered members (Geeb, BullMountain, UncleHuck, georgiaboy1970, Irishguy, Jdkprp70, Chiller, woodduck, Red Fox, Obsession, !shiloh!, Ron Brown, trlrdrdave, beetrapper, ronfromramer, StateLine, twaldrop4, CeeHawk37, CNC, CarbonClimber1, fur_n_feathers, bamaeyedoc, GATA87, MS_Hunter, leroyb, Nowlide, rickyh_2, Okatuppa, Alb, gatorbait154, TravisBatey, fillmore, BC_Reb, doublefistful, Mack1, scott and deb, square, Chancetribe, Mansfield, cartervj, El_Matador, Daveleeal, Tall Dog, Ten37, mw2015, eclipse829, Coosa1, stuball, mikewhandley, Bake, Kang, MikeP, Bustinbeards, OutdoorsAL, blade, SouthBamaSlayer, Tungsten65, deerman24, Young20, hallb, AU coonhunter, Guru, Big Al, Whitetaillane, biglmbass, AU67Skeeter, Ryano, 12 invisible),
1,081
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: republican women in politics.
[Re: Pwyse]
#4297252
03/09/25 11:12 PM
03/09/25 11:12 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,875
Lee County
RCHRR
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,875
Lee County
|
I know I am in the minority here, but don't paint us all with a broad brush. If your preferred candidates are always Republicans, then your preferred candidates would always win if you could not vote. Your preferences would be most reliably met by repeal of the 19th amendment. If they weren’t allowed to vote because republicans removed their right to vote, then their preferred candidates wouldn’t be republicans. And neither would mine if they removed my right to vote. Plus, I would want the right to vote for which republicans I wanted to be represented by. Your statement is not very well thought out. His statements usually are not well thought out (or just chauvinistic) just like the person that traveled way out west for a screwball liberal. Oh yeah I think that was Ol Jake.
Last edited by RCHRR; 03/09/25 11:13 PM.
|
|
|
Re: republican women in politics.
[Re: howl]
#4297346
03/10/25 09:15 AM
03/10/25 09:15 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,969
Prattville Al.
capehorn24
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,969
Prattville Al.
|
Newsflash, letting them vote was a real bad idea. The downward trend started there. Women just aren't wired for it. They have important roles, but it's not leading anything outside the home. Trust me when I say this, you want my wife at the head of the operating table when the surgeon is fixing to split you open. She’s the shot caller
|
|
|
Re: republican women in politics.
[Re: scrape]
#4297347
03/10/25 09:16 AM
03/10/25 09:16 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 72,320
Luverne, AL
Skinny
GUVNER
|
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 72,320
Luverne, AL
|
Prohibition worked out great didn't it?
"Never Trust Government" -- Smart people.
"The Great thing we should Fear and the Weird Thing we Trust is Elon Musk" -- Me
"You can be broke but you cant be poor." -- Ruthie-May Webster
|
|
|
Re: republican women in politics.
[Re: Pwyse]
#4297349
03/10/25 09:21 AM
03/10/25 09:21 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,318
Georgia
howl
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,318
Georgia
|
I know I am in the minority here, but don't paint us all with a broad brush. If your preferred candidates are always Republicans, then your preferred candidates would always win if you could not vote. Your preferences would be most reliably met by repeal of the 19th amendment. If they weren’t allowed to vote because republicans removed their right to vote, then their preferred candidates wouldn’t be republicans. And neither would mine if they removed my right to vote. Plus, I would want the right to vote for which republicans I wanted to be represented by. Your statement is not very well thought out. The statement was to a specific person with the condition of her only wanting Republicans elected. You statement is built on sand. Also, I encourage you to develop your views independently, not in contradiction to another's. Contrarianism is a waste of time.
|
|
|
Re: republican women in politics.
[Re: RCHRR]
#4297354
03/10/25 09:29 AM
03/10/25 09:29 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,318
Georgia
howl
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,318
Georgia
|
I know I am in the minority here, but don't paint us all with a broad brush. If your preferred candidates are always Republicans, then your preferred candidates would always win if you could not vote. Your preferences would be most reliably met by repeal of the 19th amendment. If they weren’t allowed to vote because republicans removed their right to vote, then their preferred candidates wouldn’t be republicans. And neither would mine if they removed my right to vote. Plus, I would want the right to vote for which republicans I wanted to be represented by. Your statement is not very well thought out. His statements usually are not well thought out (or just chauvinistic) just like the person that traveled way out west for a screwball liberal. Oh yeah I think that was Ol Jake. If you need to disparage another to make your point, you have no point. My statements here directly reflect hard data. Pull your head out and try to reason based on facts. If you are capable of sound reason, your conclusion must be the same.
|
|
|
Re: republican women in politics.
[Re: ShootemupTex]
#4297404
03/10/25 11:37 AM
03/10/25 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,066
limestone al
scrape
OP
12 point
|
OP
12 point
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,066
limestone al
|
Tulsi is about the only one I've seen that is cut out for it. She can hang in a logical debate without resorting to theatrics and attention seeking behavior. It's nice to see women that aren't psycho libs in office like MGT and Boebert, but sometimes I feel like I'm right back in high school hearing those two talk. It gets old. what tulsi gabbards a liberal that supports abortion and other liberal causes. The democrats have plenty of women superstars and have been successful with them and yea tulsi is one of them.
|
|
|
Re: republican women in politics.
[Re: howl]
#4297633
03/10/25 09:48 PM
03/10/25 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,704
Mobile, AL
Pwyse
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,704
Mobile, AL
|
I know I am in the minority here, but don't paint us all with a broad brush. If your preferred candidates are always Republicans, then your preferred candidates would always win if you could not vote. Your preferences would be most reliably met by repeal of the 19th amendment. If they weren’t allowed to vote because republicans removed their right to vote, then their preferred candidates wouldn’t be republicans. And neither would mine if they removed my right to vote. Plus, I would want the right to vote for which republicans I wanted to be represented by. Your statement is not very well thought out. The statement was to a specific person with the condition of her only wanting Republicans elected. You statement is built on sand. Also, I encourage you to develop your views independently, not in contradiction to another's. Contrarianism is a waste of time. Your statement was TO a specific woman, but it was ABOUT every woman in America. Obviously, if the republicans repealed the right for women to vote, they would lose more than the women’s vote. So, if you would have thought this out a little better, then you would know that your statement “Your preferences would be most reliably met by repeal of the 19th amendment.” is false. The republicans would lose a majority of their party. That is built on concrete reinforced with rebar and a huge footer all the way around. Also, I develop my views independently. I’m not even sure why you made that statement. Just because your views are nutso most of the time doesn’t make me a contrarian. I looked up the definition of that just to make sure I was correct. The very definition of it shows that I was not being contrary. Your belief is not the popular opinion.
|
|
|
|
