|
|
Tags
by Pwyse. 01/16/25 10:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
131 registered members (Bulls eye, hitek, CRUTCHJD76, CCC, Macon176, fi8shmasty, Lil_Fella, T-hatchie, Turkeyneck78, GrandSlam, Mbrock, auman, AU coonhunter, grundan, Goatkiller, J_Martin, eclipse829, dwoliver, Skillet, globe, coldtrail, Stickem, hallb, hunter84, deadeye, oldforester, Jdkprp70, Driveby, inatree, odocoileus, CNC, chill, cdaddy14, Morgan, canvasback, BigA47, dagwood, Quack Quack Bang, Holcomb, BobK, buck_buster, roll_tide_hunts, Okatuppa, Daveleeal, Beadlescomb, deadeye48, abolt300, Acorn, GomerPyle, BamaBoHunter, BamaPlowboy, jwp0020, bug54, rutwad, mule34, Pwyse, Luxfisher, DuckDown11, Spec, scrubbuck, M48scout, RandyC, J_K, JoeyWommack, 44MAG, Grumman, SC53, Fishduck, Mully, Beer Belly, Hunt4Jesus, Squadron77, lalongbeard, TideWJO, tombo51, Overland, TCG5, Solothurn, Canterberry, jdhunter2011, WEMOhunter, Heath, Frankie, Barton, stl32, Keysbowman, 000martin, top cat, Ol’Tom, WC82, ts1979flh, biglmbass, hawndog, Whitebone, Chiller, Bamarich2, HBWALKER14, slippinlipjr, Shaneomac2, Hoof2table, Bill H 280, RidgeRanger, jallencrockett, Thread Killer, benchmade47, 7mmMag, BradB, Bjoff27, BCLC, JLMiller, IVEY, Downwind, geeb1, Clayton, JCL, 7PTSPREAD, WINMAG300, Shmoe, Dean, bassmaster95, Dixiepatriot, zwick, 9 invisible),
2,873
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
#671797
09/08/13 06:05 AM
09/08/13 06:05 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,517
Land of the free because of th...
mike35549
OP
12 point
|
OP
12 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,517
Land of the free because of th...
|
According to the Alabama hunter survey the total number of deer harvested in Alabama since 2004-2005 season has been on a steady decline. From a record high of 499,000 in 2004-2005 to 255,000 in 2011-012.
If you're gonna be stupid you better be tough.
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: mike35549]
#671801
09/08/13 06:15 AM
09/08/13 06:15 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,621
Mobile,AL
jsh1904
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,621
Mobile,AL
|
What about license sales for the same time period? Or the method in which those harvest numbers were obtained? Without all of the data an opinion someone gives you is nothing more than BS.
This post is protected by copyright. Anyone found posting here is subject to certified mail from my gay sister.
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: mike35549]
#671803
09/08/13 06:16 AM
09/08/13 06:16 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,655
Gulfport, MS
BDhunts
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,655
Gulfport, MS
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the 3 buck limit had a little to do with that...
Genesis 27:3
Acts 10:11-15
Hunt Long, Hunt Hard and Safe
NRA LIFE MEMBER
"Odocoileus Virginianus"-Mother Nature's original fast food
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: BDhunts]
#671812
09/08/13 06:24 AM
09/08/13 06:24 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,993
Tuscaloosa Co.
N2TRKYS
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,993
Tuscaloosa Co.
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the 3 buck limit had a little to do with that... It's 2 deer a day.
83% of all statistics are made up.
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: mike35549]
#671815
09/08/13 06:30 AM
09/08/13 06:30 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,517
Land of the free because of th...
mike35549
OP
12 point
|
OP
12 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,517
Land of the free because of th...
|
Number of hunters also declined from 334,000 to 232,000. So number of hunters declined 30%. While deer harvest went down 49%. So that leaves a 19% or a decline of 95,000 that can not be attributed to fewer hunters.
Last edited by mike35549; 09/08/13 06:36 AM.
If you're gonna be stupid you better be tough.
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: mike35549]
#671832
09/08/13 06:49 AM
09/08/13 06:49 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,494
Jefferson
Fun4all
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,494
Jefferson
|
Number of hunters also declined from 334,000 to 232,000. So number of hunters declined 30%. While deer harvest went down 49%. So that leaves a 19% or a decline of 95,000 that can not be attributed to fewer hunters. When did the all season doe blasting go into effect?? How many people stopped shooting every deer they see because of the hassle and cost of processing?? How many leases went to self imposed limits because they were not seeing 30 does on the foodplots anymore?? How much property has been taken off the hunting market because of development or incorporation?? Are there fewer man-days being hunted on private lands?? Are there more or less man-days being hunted on the public lands? Have more restrictions been placed on number of deer that can be harvested, 3 buck rule comes to mind? In the highest figure of kills, how many were bucks, how many were does? If there was a high number of does killed and they are no being killed now and the number of bucks went down from one a day to 3 per season, wouldn't that reduce the number of deer killed?? If there are fewer hunters in the woods there is more space for the deer to be without being seen, which one would think would cause less deer to be shot. Numbers don't mean squat if there is no information regarding the variables to back up the OPINIONS. I know how we can find out what the "real numbers are", all the State has to do is FORCE all hunters under penalty of law to register their deer, yeah, that's the ticket (figuratively and literally)!! Looks like a person would have a lot of homework to do before they could form an opinion regarding the harvest numbers Statewide.
Last edited by Fun4all; 09/08/13 06:59 AM.
"After all, it is not the killing that brings satisfaction; it is the contest of skill and cunning. The true hunter counts his achievement in proportion to the effort involved and the fairness of the sport." Dr. Saxton Pope
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: mike35549]
#671839
09/08/13 07:03 AM
09/08/13 07:03 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,861
Clanton
Turkey_neck
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,861
Clanton
|
Just my opinion but I have seen a major decline in deer numbers since doe days went season long.
Would walk over a naked woman to get to a gobblin turkey!
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: mike35549]
#671862
09/08/13 07:48 AM
09/08/13 07:48 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 54,864
Gee's Bend/At The Hog Pen
James
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 54,864
Gee's Bend/At The Hog Pen
|
Yep that's how you get more deer you kill all the baby makers! Lol..
Do not regret growing older, it's a privilege denied to many!
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: Turkey_neck]
#671874
09/08/13 08:07 AM
09/08/13 08:07 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252
South Alabama
gobbler
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,252
South Alabama
|
Just my opinion but I have seen a major decline in deer numbers since doe days went season long. The season long doe days and 2 doe a day limit was SUPPOSED to reduce deer numbers! What do you think they implemented it for?
I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: N2TRKYS]
#671876
09/08/13 08:10 AM
09/08/13 08:10 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,655
Gulfport, MS
BDhunts
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,655
Gulfport, MS
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the 3 buck limit had a little to do with that... It's 2 deer a day. That is not a correction. There is a SEASON LIMIT on BUCKS 3 as stated. That started in 2007, thus that has to have accounted for some reduction of Total harvest numbers.
Genesis 27:3
Acts 10:11-15
Hunt Long, Hunt Hard and Safe
NRA LIFE MEMBER
"Odocoileus Virginianus"-Mother Nature's original fast food
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: 49er]
#671908
09/08/13 08:47 AM
09/08/13 08:47 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 54,864
Gee's Bend/At The Hog Pen
James
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 54,864
Gee's Bend/At The Hog Pen
|
It is OK.
The areas in the state that were over populated now have deer that have migrated to those areas that were under populated and there is now a balance of deer with their habitat.
There is also a balance of does and bucks everywhere throughout the state and the age structure of bucks is in balance now.
The deer study committee has had it all under control since 2007, so we can rest assured everything is now alright with our deer herd.
Just continue to do whatever they tell you, no matter how much trouble it may be, and don't worry about anything.
The deer study committee has spoken. Nothing else matters. hey don't forget Alfa cause they really have the "hunters" interests @ heart! Lmao
Do not regret growing older, it's a privilege denied to many!
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: Fun4all]
#671911
09/08/13 08:48 AM
09/08/13 08:48 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,517
Land of the free because of th...
mike35549
OP
12 point
|
OP
12 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,517
Land of the free because of th...
|
Number of hunters also declined from 334,000 to 232,000. So number of hunters declined 30%. While deer harvest went down 49%. So that leaves a 19% or a decline of 95,000 that can not be attributed to fewer hunters. When did the all season doe blasting go into effect?? How many people stopped shooting every deer they see because of the hassle and cost of processing?? How many leases went to self imposed limits because they were not seeing 30 does on the foodplots anymore?? How much property has been taken off the hunting market because of development or incorporation?? Are there fewer man-days being hunted on private lands?? Are there more or less man-days being hunted on the public lands? Have more restrictions been placed on number of deer that can be harvested, 3 buck rule comes to mind? In the highest figure of kills, how many were bucks, how many were does? If there was a high number of does killed and they are no being killed now and the number of bucks went down from one a day to 3 per season, wouldn't that reduce the number of deer killed?? If there are fewer hunters in the woods there is more space for the deer to be without being seen, which one would think would cause less deer to be shot. Numbers don't mean squat if there is no information regarding the variables to back up the OPINIONS. I know how we can find out what the "real numbers are", all the State has to do is FORCE all hunters under penalty of law to register their deer, yeah, that's the ticket (figuratively and literally)!! Looks like a person would have a lot of homework to do before they could form an opinion regarding the harvest numbers Statewide. Most all those questions can be answered by reading the reports
If you're gonna be stupid you better be tough.
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: BDhunts]
#671918
09/08/13 08:56 AM
09/08/13 08:56 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,993
Tuscaloosa Co.
N2TRKYS
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,993
Tuscaloosa Co.
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the 3 buck limit had a little to do with that... It's 2 deer a day. That is not a correction. There is a SEASON LIMIT on BUCKS 3 as stated. That started in 2007, thus that has to have accounted for some reduction of Total harvest numbers. 2 deer a day is still 2 deer a day, regardless of the sex of the deer.
83% of all statistics are made up.
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: mike35549]
#671939
09/08/13 09:14 AM
09/08/13 09:14 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,494
Jefferson
Fun4all
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,494
Jefferson
|
Number of hunters also declined from 334,000 to 232,000. So number of hunters declined 30%. While deer harvest went down 49%. So that leaves a 19% or a decline of 95,000 that can not be attributed to fewer hunters. When did the all season doe blasting go into effect?? How many people stopped shooting every deer they see because of the hassle and cost of processing?? How many leases went to self imposed limits because they were not seeing 30 does on the foodplots anymore?? How much property has been taken off the hunting market because of development or incorporation?? Are there fewer man-days being hunted on private lands?? Are there more or less man-days being hunted on the public lands? Have more restrictions been placed on number of deer that can be harvested, 3 buck rule comes to mind? In the highest figure of kills, how many were bucks, how many were does? If there was a high number of does killed and they are no being killed now and the number of bucks went down from one a day to 3 per season, wouldn't that reduce the number of deer killed?? If there are fewer hunters in the woods there is more space for the deer to be without being seen, which one would think would cause less deer to be shot. Numbers don't mean squat if there is no information regarding the variables to back up the OPINIONS. I know how we can find out what the "real numbers are", all the State has to do is FORCE all hunters under penalty of law to register their deer, yeah, that's the ticket (figuratively and literally)!! Looks like a person would have a lot of homework to do before they could form an opinion regarding the harvest numbers Statewide. Most all those questions can be answered by reading the reports I am sure they can without any assumption being made or numbers made up and all variables taken into account. Finite data with assumptions does not take into account of infinite variables. Even the Biologist say the make up numbers on deer populations, that gives me confidence in the numbers. On WMA's they keep better records and can provide a glimpse of accuracy of maybe 75% for gun hunts for who checks in and out and at best 50% for bowhunts for the impact that occurs on a finite amount of property. Do you think Statewide is even remotely close to that??
"After all, it is not the killing that brings satisfaction; it is the contest of skill and cunning. The true hunter counts his achievement in proportion to the effort involved and the fairness of the sport." Dr. Saxton Pope
|
|
|
Re: Opinion on decline of state deer harvest last 8 years.
[Re: N2TRKYS]
#671948
09/08/13 09:25 AM
09/08/13 09:25 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 678
Florence, AL
Jack Fate
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 678
Florence, AL
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the 3 buck limit had a little to do with that... It's 2 deer a day. That is not a correction. There is a SEASON LIMIT on BUCKS 3 as stated. That started in 2007, thus that has to have accounted for some reduction of Total harvest numbers. 2 deer a day is still 2 deer a day, regardless of the sex of the deer. I think what they may be surmising is, since the limit was imposed, once a hunter got his or her 3 bucks they were done. They may have in the past been killing 6 or 8 or 10 etc.
I Have Stood Next To Death, and People Liked Him Better
|
|
|
|
