Expert , don't know, lookin' like a pretty fair Debbie Downer though.

I should make it clear that I'm not saying we are technologically inferior to anyone. We are the best, but we overstate our capabilities, just like everyone else.

Shooting a small, fast moving target out of the air is much harder than hitting a large stationary target. The attacker only has to get it right once, while the defender has to get it right every time.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davida...ll-differ-from-americas/?sh=8cbaf6926b34

The DU armor has to be replaced on export models and replaced with Tungsten

Have you or any of your family ever served in or around tank battalions since the 1980s? If so, you are entitled to compensation.

Tanks are target practice for missiles.

True, but missiles can't hold ground. If you want to advance your frontlines, you need combined arms warfare. Tanks and IFV are an important part of that.

Yes, infantry and armor will always be needed to occupy enemy ground. Tanks are done. Melt them down and make helicopters, planes, carriers or even welfare cards. Until space force is capable of defeating an enemy Air Force, air power will always be the deciding factor in a major war. Of course you’ll have to knock out your enemies air defense first. Ukraine may be the last major ground war the planet will ever see between two “modern” military’s.

I think tanks do have a place in the battlefield in a more limited role than past engagements. We have other vehicles to fill some of the gaps, that requires less logistics and support. But to do away with tanks completely? I'm not there yet, but I'm persuadable. Tell me why we don't need tanks.